Ethical Challenges Experienced by Clinical Ethicists during COVID-19.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Connie M Ulrich, Janet A Deatrick, Jesse Wool, Liming Huang, Nancy Berlinger, Christine Grady
{"title":"Ethical Challenges Experienced by Clinical Ethicists during COVID-19.","authors":"Connie M Ulrich,&nbsp;Janet A Deatrick,&nbsp;Jesse Wool,&nbsp;Liming Huang,&nbsp;Nancy Berlinger,&nbsp;Christine Grady","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2022.2110965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt every society as SARs-CoV-2 variants surge among the populations. Health care providers are exhausted, becoming ill themselves, and in some instances have died. Indeed, hospitals are struggling to find staff to care for critically ill patients most in need. Previous work has reported on the unending work-related conditions that hospital staff are laboring under and their subsequent mental and physical health strains. Health care providers need support, but it is not clear where that support is to come from. While much research has reported on the COVID-19-related fears of nurses and physicians, fewer studies have focused on supportive features of the hospital work environment and how it may provide relief to front-line health care providers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This purpose of this study was to explore an often-overlooked resource within hospital systems across the United States-clinical ethicists-and examine their many roles during COVID-19 and the types of ethical issues they addressed with nurses, physicians, administrators, and others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a primary analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 23 clinical ethicists across the United States. The interviews were conducted from November 2020-April 2021 and were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified; both inductive and deductive analyses were used to identify qualitative themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major themes were identified: ethical issues that were increasingly more complex, moral distress that was \"endemic,\" shifting ethical paradigms from the focus on the individual to the population, fostering a supportive environment, and organizational ethics: variation in the value, roles, and policy input of clinical ethicists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings report on the integral and expanded role of clinical ethicists at an unprecedented time in our nation, and how they stepped forward to support front-line clinicians in hospitals across the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2110965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt every society as SARs-CoV-2 variants surge among the populations. Health care providers are exhausted, becoming ill themselves, and in some instances have died. Indeed, hospitals are struggling to find staff to care for critically ill patients most in need. Previous work has reported on the unending work-related conditions that hospital staff are laboring under and their subsequent mental and physical health strains. Health care providers need support, but it is not clear where that support is to come from. While much research has reported on the COVID-19-related fears of nurses and physicians, fewer studies have focused on supportive features of the hospital work environment and how it may provide relief to front-line health care providers.

Purpose: This purpose of this study was to explore an often-overlooked resource within hospital systems across the United States-clinical ethicists-and examine their many roles during COVID-19 and the types of ethical issues they addressed with nurses, physicians, administrators, and others.

Methods: This was a primary analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 23 clinical ethicists across the United States. The interviews were conducted from November 2020-April 2021 and were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified; both inductive and deductive analyses were used to identify qualitative themes.

Results: Five major themes were identified: ethical issues that were increasingly more complex, moral distress that was "endemic," shifting ethical paradigms from the focus on the individual to the population, fostering a supportive environment, and organizational ethics: variation in the value, roles, and policy input of clinical ethicists.

Conclusions: Our findings report on the integral and expanded role of clinical ethicists at an unprecedented time in our nation, and how they stepped forward to support front-line clinicians in hospitals across the country.

临床伦理学家在COVID-19期间面临的伦理挑战。
背景:随着SARs-CoV-2变体在人群中激增,COVID-19大流行继续扰乱每个社会。卫生保健提供者筋疲力尽,自己也生病了,在某些情况下已经死亡。事实上,医院正在努力寻找工作人员来照顾最需要帮助的危重病人。以前的工作报告了医院工作人员无休止的工作条件,以及他们随后的精神和身体健康压力。卫生保健提供者需要支持,但目前尚不清楚这种支持来自何处。虽然有很多研究报道了护士和医生对covid -19相关的恐惧,但很少有研究关注医院工作环境的支持性特征以及它如何为一线卫生保健提供者提供救济。目的:本研究的目的是探索美国医院系统中经常被忽视的资源——临床伦理学家,并研究他们在COVID-19期间的许多角色,以及他们与护士、医生、管理人员和其他人一起解决的伦理问题类型。方法:这是对美国23名临床伦理学家的半结构化定性访谈的初步分析。访谈于2020年11月至2021年4月进行,并进行了录音、逐字转录和去识别;归纳和演绎分析都被用来确定定性主题。结果:确定了五个主要主题:日益复杂的伦理问题,“地方性”的道德困境,将伦理范式从关注个人转向关注人群,培养支持性环境,组织伦理:临床伦理学家的价值、角色和政策投入的变化。结论:我们的研究结果报告了临床伦理学家在我国前所未有的时期的整体和扩大的作用,以及他们如何挺身而出,支持全国各地医院的一线临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信