General practice managers' motivations for skill mix change in primary care: Results from a cross-sectional survey in England.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jon Gibson, Anne McBride, Katherine Checkland, Mhorag Goff, Mark Hann, Damian Hodgson, Imelda McDermott, Matt Sutton, Sharon Spooner
{"title":"General practice managers' motivations for skill mix change in primary care: Results from a cross-sectional survey in England.","authors":"Jon Gibson,&nbsp;Anne McBride,&nbsp;Katherine Checkland,&nbsp;Mhorag Goff,&nbsp;Mark Hann,&nbsp;Damian Hodgson,&nbsp;Imelda McDermott,&nbsp;Matt Sutton,&nbsp;Sharon Spooner","doi":"10.1177/13558196221117647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives are to determine the factors that motivated GP practice managers in England to employ non-medical roles, and to identify an ideal hypothetical GP practice workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey of GP practice managers in England (<i>n</i> = 1205). The survey focused on six non-medical roles: advanced nurse practitioner, specialist nurse, health care assistant, physician associate, paramedic and pharmacist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three most commonly selected motivating factors were: (i) to achieve a better match between what patients need and what the practitioner team can deliver; (ii) to increase overall appointment availability and (iii) to release GP time. Employment of pharmacists and physician associates was most commonly supported by additional funding. Practice managers preferred accessing new non-medical roles through a primary care network or similar, while there was a clear preference for direct employment of additional GPs, advanced nurse practitioners or practice nurses. The ideal practice workforce would comprise over 70% of GPs and nurses, containing, on average, fewer GPs than the current GP practice workforce.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms that more diverse teams of practitioners are playing an increasing role in providing primary care in England. Managers prefer not to employ all new roles directly within the practice. A more detailed investigation of future workforce requirements is necessary to ensure that health policy supports the funding (whether practice or population based), recruitment, training, deployment and workloads associated with the mix of roles needed in an effective primary care workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"28 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9850398/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196221117647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives are to determine the factors that motivated GP practice managers in England to employ non-medical roles, and to identify an ideal hypothetical GP practice workforce.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey of GP practice managers in England (n = 1205). The survey focused on six non-medical roles: advanced nurse practitioner, specialist nurse, health care assistant, physician associate, paramedic and pharmacist.

Results: The three most commonly selected motivating factors were: (i) to achieve a better match between what patients need and what the practitioner team can deliver; (ii) to increase overall appointment availability and (iii) to release GP time. Employment of pharmacists and physician associates was most commonly supported by additional funding. Practice managers preferred accessing new non-medical roles through a primary care network or similar, while there was a clear preference for direct employment of additional GPs, advanced nurse practitioners or practice nurses. The ideal practice workforce would comprise over 70% of GPs and nurses, containing, on average, fewer GPs than the current GP practice workforce.

Conclusion: This study confirms that more diverse teams of practitioners are playing an increasing role in providing primary care in England. Managers prefer not to employ all new roles directly within the practice. A more detailed investigation of future workforce requirements is necessary to ensure that health policy supports the funding (whether practice or population based), recruitment, training, deployment and workloads associated with the mix of roles needed in an effective primary care workforce.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

初级保健中全科医生对技能组合改变的动机:来自英格兰横断面调查的结果。
目标:目标是确定激励GP实践经理在英格兰雇用非医疗角色的因素,并确定一个理想的假设GP实践劳动力。方法:对英格兰全科医生执业经理进行横断面调查(n = 1205)。调查集中在六个非医疗角色:高级执业护士、专科护士、保健助理、医师助理、护理人员和药剂师。结果:三个最常选择的激励因素是:(i)实现患者需求与医生团队所能提供的更好的匹配;(ii)增加整体的预约时间,以及(iii)释放全科医生的时间。药剂师和医师助理的就业通常由额外的资金支持。实践管理人员更喜欢通过初级保健网络或类似的方式获得新的非医疗角色,而直接雇用额外的全科医生、高级执业护士或执业护士显然是首选。理想的实践劳动力将包括超过70%的全科医生和护士,平均而言,比目前的全科医生实践劳动力更少的全科医生。结论:这项研究证实,在英格兰,更多样化的医生团队在提供初级保健方面发挥着越来越大的作用。管理者不喜欢在实践中直接使用所有的新角色。有必要对未来的劳动力需求进行更详细的调查,以确保卫生政策支持与有效的初级保健劳动力所需的各种角色组合相关的供资(无论是基于实践还是基于人口)、招聘、培训、部署和工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信