Current molecular approach for diagnosis of MRSA: a meta-narrative review.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sim Yi Xing, Lee Qiao Wei, Aisha Abushelaibi, Kok Song Lai, Swee Hua Erin Lim, Sathiya Maran
{"title":"Current molecular approach for diagnosis of MRSA: a meta-narrative review.","authors":"Sim Yi Xing, Lee Qiao Wei, Aisha Abushelaibi, Kok Song Lai, Swee Hua Erin Lim, Sathiya Maran","doi":"10.33393/dti.2022.2522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Detection and diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are important in ensuring a correct and effective treatment, further reducing its spread. A wide range of molecular approaches has been used for the diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in MRSA. This review aims to study and appraise widely used molecular diagnostic methods for detecting MRSA. Methods: This meta-narrative review was performed by searching PubMed using the following search terms: (molecular diagnosis) AND (antimicrobial resistance) AND (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Studies using molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of MRSA were included, while non-English language, duplicates and non-article studies were excluded. After reviewing the libraries and a further manual search, 20 studies were included in this article. RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews was used for this synthesis. Results: A total of 20 full papers were reviewed and appraised in this synthesis, consisting of PCR technique (n = 7), deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Microarray (n = 1), DNA sequencing (n = 2), Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay (n = 2), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (n = 2), MLST (n = 4), SCCmec typing (n = 1) and GENECUBE (n = 1). Discussion: Different diagnostic methods used to diagnose MRSA have been studied in this review. This study concludes that PCR has been extensively used due to its higher sensitivity and cost-effectiveness in the past five years","PeriodicalId":11326,"journal":{"name":"Drug Target Insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/1b/dti-16-88.PMC9906022.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Target Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/dti.2022.2522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Detection and diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are important in ensuring a correct and effective treatment, further reducing its spread. A wide range of molecular approaches has been used for the diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in MRSA. This review aims to study and appraise widely used molecular diagnostic methods for detecting MRSA. Methods: This meta-narrative review was performed by searching PubMed using the following search terms: (molecular diagnosis) AND (antimicrobial resistance) AND (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Studies using molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of MRSA were included, while non-English language, duplicates and non-article studies were excluded. After reviewing the libraries and a further manual search, 20 studies were included in this article. RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews was used for this synthesis. Results: A total of 20 full papers were reviewed and appraised in this synthesis, consisting of PCR technique (n = 7), deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) Microarray (n = 1), DNA sequencing (n = 2), Xpert MRSA/SA BC assay (n = 2), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (n = 2), MLST (n = 4), SCCmec typing (n = 1) and GENECUBE (n = 1). Discussion: Different diagnostic methods used to diagnose MRSA have been studied in this review. This study concludes that PCR has been extensively used due to its higher sensitivity and cost-effectiveness in the past five years

Abstract Image

当前MRSA诊断的分子方法:元叙述综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Target Insights
Drug Target Insights PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信