Telehealth in cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1177/1357633X221136305
Kate Burbury, Peter Brooks, Leslie Gilham, Ilana Solo, Amanda Piper, Craig Underhill, Philip Campbell, Robert Blum, Stephen Brown, Frances Barnett, Javier Torres, Xiaofang Wang, William Poole, Anneke Grobler, Genevieve Johnston, Cassandra Beer, Hannah Cross, Zee Wan Wong
{"title":"Telehealth in cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Kate Burbury, Peter Brooks, Leslie Gilham, Ilana Solo, Amanda Piper, Craig Underhill, Philip Campbell, Robert Blum, Stephen Brown, Frances Barnett, Javier Torres, Xiaofang Wang, William Poole, Anneke Grobler, Genevieve Johnston, Cassandra Beer, Hannah Cross, Zee Wan Wong","doi":"10.1177/1357633X221136305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Victorian COVID-19 Cancer Network (VCCN) Telehealth Expert Working Group aimed to evaluate the telehealth (TH) experience for cancer patients, carers and clinicians with the rapid uptake of TH in early 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective multi-centre cross-sectional survey involving eight Victorian regional and metropolitan cancer services and three consumer advocacy groups. Patients or their carers and clinicians who had TH consultations between 1 July 2020 and 31 December 2020 were invited to participate in patient and clinician surveys, respectively. These surveys were opened from September to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The acceptability of TH via both video (82.9%) and phone (70.4%) were high though acceptability appeared to decrease in older phone TH users. Video was associated with higher satisfaction compared to phone (87.1% vs 79.7%) even though phone was more commonly used. Various themes from the qualitative surveys highlighted barriers and enablers to rapid TH implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The high TH acceptability supports this as a safe and effective strategy for continued care and should persist beyond the pandemic environment, where patient preferences are considered and clinically appropriate. Ongoing support to health services for infrastructure and resources, as well as expansion of reimbursement eligibility criteria for patients and health professionals, including allied health and nursing, are crucial for sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1270-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742741/pdf/10.1177_1357633X221136305.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221136305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Victorian COVID-19 Cancer Network (VCCN) Telehealth Expert Working Group aimed to evaluate the telehealth (TH) experience for cancer patients, carers and clinicians with the rapid uptake of TH in early 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a prospective multi-centre cross-sectional survey involving eight Victorian regional and metropolitan cancer services and three consumer advocacy groups. Patients or their carers and clinicians who had TH consultations between 1 July 2020 and 31 December 2020 were invited to participate in patient and clinician surveys, respectively. These surveys were opened from September to December 2020.

Results: The acceptability of TH via both video (82.9%) and phone (70.4%) were high though acceptability appeared to decrease in older phone TH users. Video was associated with higher satisfaction compared to phone (87.1% vs 79.7%) even though phone was more commonly used. Various themes from the qualitative surveys highlighted barriers and enablers to rapid TH implementation.

Discussion: The high TH acceptability supports this as a safe and effective strategy for continued care and should persist beyond the pandemic environment, where patient preferences are considered and clinically appropriate. Ongoing support to health services for infrastructure and resources, as well as expansion of reimbursement eligibility criteria for patients and health professionals, including allied health and nursing, are crucial for sustainability.

COVID-19 大流行期间癌症护理中的远程保健。
导言:维多利亚州 COVID-19 癌症网络 (VCCN) 远程医疗专家工作组旨在评估癌症患者、护理者和临床医生在 2020 年初 COVID-19 大流行期间迅速采用远程医疗的体验:我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心横断面调查,涉及维多利亚州八个地区和大都市的癌症服务机构以及三个消费者权益团体。我们邀请在 2020 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受过 TH 咨询的患者或其护理者和临床医生分别参与患者和临床医生调查。这些调查于 2020 年 9 月至 12 月进行:通过视频(82.9%)和电话(70.4%)咨询的接受度都很高,但老年电话咨询用户的接受度似乎有所下降。与电话相比,视频的满意度更高(87.1% 对 79.7%),尽管电话更常用。定性调查中的各种主题强调了快速实施 TH 的障碍和促进因素:讨论:TH 的高接受度支持了这一安全有效的持续护理策略,在考虑到患者偏好和临床适宜性的情况下,TH 应在大流行环境后继续使用。持续支持医疗服务机构的基础设施和资源,以及扩大患者和医疗专业人员(包括专职医疗和护理人员)的报销资格标准,对于可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信