Sagittal Plane Assessment in Deformity Correction Planning: The Sagittal Joint Line Angle.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Talal B Abalkhail, Philip K McClure
{"title":"Sagittal Plane Assessment in Deformity Correction Planning: The Sagittal Joint Line Angle.","authors":"Talal B Abalkhail,&nbsp;Philip K McClure","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluate the validity of a recent approach to calculate the knee flexion or extension contracture contributing to the overall sagittal deformity using the sagittal mechanical axis angle (SMAA) for the overall alignment assessment and sagittal joint line angle (SJLA) for soft tissue contribution. The methods of evaluating these angles and their clinical applications are discussed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 107 normal limbs met the criteria and were divided into two groups: skeletally mature and immature. Sagittal alignment was evaluated using the Bone Ninja iPad application, and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA), SMAA and SJLA were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In skeletally immature patients, mean SJLA was 13.46° [standard deviation (SD), 4.55°], and in mature patients, it was 16.91° (SD, 2.948°). The PDFA and PPTA were consistent with previously published measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SJLA method is a practical way to quantify the soft tissue contribution and degree of contracture. It can also be used for monitoring deterioration or improvement of knee range of motion during lengthening or physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>All patients in this study presented to our clinic with symptoms on the contralateral side. This, in addition to the retrospective nature, was a limitation in our study.We recommend a validity study to compare our SJLA method to the classic anterior cortical line angle (ACL) method in addition to an inter-observer and intra-observer reliability study for the SJLA. We also recommend a study on completely normal asymptomatic subjects to better standardise the angle measurements in skeletally immature patients at different ages.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Abalkhail TB, McClure PK. Sagittal Plane Assessment in Deformity Correction Planning: The Sagittal Joint Line Angle. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):159-164.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"17 3","pages":"159-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/f3/stlr-17-159.PMC9886026.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Evaluate the validity of a recent approach to calculate the knee flexion or extension contracture contributing to the overall sagittal deformity using the sagittal mechanical axis angle (SMAA) for the overall alignment assessment and sagittal joint line angle (SJLA) for soft tissue contribution. The methods of evaluating these angles and their clinical applications are discussed.

Materials and methods: In total, 107 normal limbs met the criteria and were divided into two groups: skeletally mature and immature. Sagittal alignment was evaluated using the Bone Ninja iPad application, and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA), SMAA and SJLA were recorded.

Results: In skeletally immature patients, mean SJLA was 13.46° [standard deviation (SD), 4.55°], and in mature patients, it was 16.91° (SD, 2.948°). The PDFA and PPTA were consistent with previously published measurements.

Conclusion: The SJLA method is a practical way to quantify the soft tissue contribution and degree of contracture. It can also be used for monitoring deterioration or improvement of knee range of motion during lengthening or physical therapy.

Clinical significance: All patients in this study presented to our clinic with symptoms on the contralateral side. This, in addition to the retrospective nature, was a limitation in our study.We recommend a validity study to compare our SJLA method to the classic anterior cortical line angle (ACL) method in addition to an inter-observer and intra-observer reliability study for the SJLA. We also recommend a study on completely normal asymptomatic subjects to better standardise the angle measurements in skeletally immature patients at different ages.

How to cite this article: Abalkhail TB, McClure PK. Sagittal Plane Assessment in Deformity Correction Planning: The Sagittal Joint Line Angle. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):159-164.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

变形矫正规划中的矢状面评估:矢状关节线角度。
目的:评估最近一种方法的有效性,该方法使用矢状机械轴角(SMAA)进行整体对齐评估,并使用矢状关节线角(SJLA)进行软组织贡献来计算导致整体矢状畸形的膝关节屈曲或伸展挛缩。讨论了评价这些角度的方法及其临床应用。材料和方法:共有107条正常肢体符合标准,分为骨骼成熟组和未成熟组。使用Bone Ninja iPad应用程序评估矢状位对齐,并记录股骨远端后角(PDFA)、胫骨近端后角(PPTA)、SMAA和SJLA。结果:骨骼不成熟患者的平均SJLA为13.46°[标准差(SD),4.55°],成熟患者为16.91°(SD,2.948°)。PDFA和PPTA与先前公布的测量结果一致。结论:SJLA方法是一种实用的量化软组织贡献和挛缩程度的方法。它还可用于监测延长或物理治疗期间膝盖活动范围的恶化或改善。临床意义:本研究中所有患者均出现对侧症状。除了回顾性之外,这也是我们研究的局限性。除了SJLA的观察者间和观察者内可靠性研究外,我们建议进行一项有效性研究,将我们的SJLA方法与经典的前皮质线角(ACL)方法进行比较。我们还建议对完全正常的无症状受试者进行研究,以更好地标准化不同年龄骨骼发育不成熟患者的角度测量。如何引用这篇文章:Abalkhail TB,McClure PK。变形矫正规划中的矢状面评估:矢状关节线角度。创伤肢体康复策略2022;17(3):159-164。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信