Navigating Pandemic Moral Distress at Home and at Work: Frontline Workers' Experiences.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
S A Miner, B E Berkman, V Altiery de Jesus, L Jamal, C Grady
{"title":"Navigating Pandemic Moral Distress at Home and at Work: Frontline Workers' Experiences.","authors":"S A Miner,&nbsp;B E Berkman,&nbsp;V Altiery de Jesus,&nbsp;L Jamal,&nbsp;C Grady","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2022.2064000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline workers faced a series of challenges balancing family and work responsibilities. These challenges included making decisions about how to reduce COVID-19 exposure to their families while still carrying out their employment duties and caring for their children. We sought to understand how frontline workers made these decisions and how these decisions impacted their experiences.<b>Methods:</b> Between October 2020 and May 2021, we conducted 61 semi-structured interviews in English or Spanish, with individuals who continued to work outside of the home during the pandemic and had children living at home. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using abductive methods.<b>Results:</b> Frontline workers experienced moral distress, the inability to act in accordance with their values and obligations because of internal or external constraints. Their moral distress was a result of the tensions they felt as workers and parents, which sometimes led them to feel like they had to compromise on either or both responsibilities. Individuals felt morally conflicted because 1) their COVID-19 work exposures presented risk that often jeopardized their family's health; 2) their work hours often conflicted with their increased childcare responsibilities; and 3) they felt a duty to their colleagues, patients/customers, and communities to continue to show-up to work.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings point to a need to expand the concept of moral distress to include the perspectives of frontline workers outside of the healthcare professions and the fraught decisions that workers make outside of work that may impact their moral distress. Expanding the concept of moral distress also allows for a justice-based framing that can focus attention on the disparities inherent in much frontline work and can justify programmatic recommendations, like increasing paid childcare opportunities, to alleviate moral distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":"13 4","pages":"215-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2064000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, frontline workers faced a series of challenges balancing family and work responsibilities. These challenges included making decisions about how to reduce COVID-19 exposure to their families while still carrying out their employment duties and caring for their children. We sought to understand how frontline workers made these decisions and how these decisions impacted their experiences.Methods: Between October 2020 and May 2021, we conducted 61 semi-structured interviews in English or Spanish, with individuals who continued to work outside of the home during the pandemic and had children living at home. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using abductive methods.Results: Frontline workers experienced moral distress, the inability to act in accordance with their values and obligations because of internal or external constraints. Their moral distress was a result of the tensions they felt as workers and parents, which sometimes led them to feel like they had to compromise on either or both responsibilities. Individuals felt morally conflicted because 1) their COVID-19 work exposures presented risk that often jeopardized their family's health; 2) their work hours often conflicted with their increased childcare responsibilities; and 3) they felt a duty to their colleagues, patients/customers, and communities to continue to show-up to work.Conclusions: Our findings point to a need to expand the concept of moral distress to include the perspectives of frontline workers outside of the healthcare professions and the fraught decisions that workers make outside of work that may impact their moral distress. Expanding the concept of moral distress also allows for a justice-based framing that can focus attention on the disparities inherent in much frontline work and can justify programmatic recommendations, like increasing paid childcare opportunities, to alleviate moral distress.

在家庭和工作中应对流行病的道德困境:一线工作者的经历。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,一线工作者面临着平衡家庭和工作责任的一系列挑战。这些挑战包括决定如何在履行就业职责和照顾子女的同时减少对家人的COVID-19暴露。我们试图了解一线员工如何做出这些决定,以及这些决定如何影响他们的经历。方法:在2020年10月至2021年5月期间,我们用英语或西班牙语进行了61次半结构化访谈,访谈对象是在大流行期间继续在家外工作且有孩子住在家里的个人。访谈被记录下来,逐字抄写,并使用诱拐方法进行分析。结果:一线员工由于受到内部或外部的约束,无法按照自己的价值观和义务行事,出现道德困境。他们的道德困境源于他们作为工人和父母所感受到的紧张关系,这有时会让他们觉得他们必须在其中一个或两个责任上妥协。个人感到道德冲突,因为1)他们接触COVID-19的工作往往会危及家人的健康;2)她们的工作时间经常与她们日益增加的育儿责任相冲突;3)他们觉得对同事、病人/顾客和社区有责任继续上班。结论:我们的研究结果表明,有必要扩大道德困境的概念,以包括医疗保健专业以外的一线工作者的观点,以及工作者在工作之外做出的可能影响他们道德困境的令人担忧的决定。扩大道德困境的概念还允许基于正义的框架,可以将注意力集中在许多一线工作中固有的差异上,并可以证明方案建议的合理性,例如增加有偿托儿机会,以减轻道德困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信