Attachment-Related Anxiety and Religiosity as Predictors of Generalized Self-Efficacy and Dispositional Hope.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2022.0302

Emrullah Ecer

{"title":"Attachment-Related Anxiety and Religiosity as Predictors of Generalized Self-Efficacy and Dispositional Hope.","authors":"Emrullah Ecer","doi":"10.11621/pir.2022.0302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Attachment-related anxiety and avoidance have a significant impact on self-esteem, optimism, and hope. Moreover, previous studies have shown that religiosity can also be an important factor in promoting hope and emotional regulation. Objective The first aim of this study was to explore the relationship between attachment-related anxiety, attachment-related avoidance, dispositional hope, generalized self-efficacy (GSE), future time perspective (FTP) as future time opportunities (FTO), and focus on limitations (FOL). The second purpose was to detect the effect of religiosity on hope, GSE, and FTP. Design The study involved 153 Turkish participants (Females n = 81, 52.9%), between the ages of 18 and 66, who filled out the Dispositional Hope Scale, and the Experience in Close Relationship-Revised (ECR-R), FTP, and GSE inventories via a Google survey. A Pearson correlation test, multiple linear regression analysis, and an independent t-test were computed. Results Attachment-related anxiety was inversely related to dispositional hope and GSE, while it was positively associated with FOL. Attachment-related avoidance was negatively related to dispositional hope and FTO, whereas it was positively correlated with FOL. FTO was positively correlated with GSE and dispositional hope. Religious participants had a higher level of dispositional hope and GSE than non-religious participants. A lower level of attachment-related anxiety and religiosity was associated with a higher level of GSE and hope. Females showed a higher level of makeup agency than men, whereas the men reported a higher level of FOL than the women. Conclusion This study concluded that both attachment-related anxiety and religiosity were predictors of hope and GSE. Gender differences played a significant role in FOL and make-up agency. Moreover, it was found that attachment-related anxiety and avoidance have different functions in GSE and FTO.","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"15 3","pages":"21-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Attachment-related anxiety and avoidance have a significant impact on self-esteem, optimism, and hope. Moreover, previous studies have shown that religiosity can also be an important factor in promoting hope and emotional regulation. Objective The first aim of this study was to explore the relationship between attachment-related anxiety, attachment-related avoidance, dispositional hope, generalized self-efficacy (GSE), future time perspective (FTP) as future time opportunities (FTO), and focus on limitations (FOL). The second purpose was to detect the effect of religiosity on hope, GSE, and FTP. Design The study involved 153 Turkish participants (Females n = 81, 52.9%), between the ages of 18 and 66, who filled out the Dispositional Hope Scale, and the Experience in Close Relationship-Revised (ECR-R), FTP, and GSE inventories via a Google survey. A Pearson correlation test, multiple linear regression analysis, and an independent t-test were computed. Results Attachment-related anxiety was inversely related to dispositional hope and GSE, while it was positively associated with FOL. Attachment-related avoidance was negatively related to dispositional hope and FTO, whereas it was positively correlated with FOL. FTO was positively correlated with GSE and dispositional hope. Religious participants had a higher level of dispositional hope and GSE than non-religious participants. A lower level of attachment-related anxiety and religiosity was associated with a higher level of GSE and hope. Females showed a higher level of makeup agency than men, whereas the men reported a higher level of FOL than the women. Conclusion This study concluded that both attachment-related anxiety and religiosity were predictors of hope and GSE. Gender differences played a significant role in FOL and make-up agency. Moreover, it was found that attachment-related anxiety and avoidance have different functions in GSE and FTO.

查看原文本刊更多论文

依恋相关焦虑和宗教虔诚作为广义自我效能和气质希望的预测因子。

背景:依恋相关焦虑和回避对自尊、乐观和希望有显著影响。此外，先前的研究表明，宗教信仰也可能是促进希望和情绪调节的重要因素。目的:本研究的第一目的是探讨依恋相关焦虑、依恋相关回避、性格希望、广义自我效能感(GSE)、未来时间展望(FTP)作为未来时间机会(FTO)和关注限制(FOL)之间的关系。第二个目的是检测宗教信仰对希望、GSE和FTP的影响。设计:该研究涉及153名土耳其参与者(女性n = 81, 52.9%)，年龄在18至66岁之间，他们通过谷歌调查填写了性格希望量表、亲密关系经验修订(ECR-R)、FTP和GSE清单。进行Pearson相关检验、多元线性回归分析和独立t检验。结果:依恋相关焦虑与性情性希望、GSE呈负相关，与自由相关度呈正相关。依恋相关回避与性格希望和自由自由度呈负相关，与自由自由度呈正相关。FTO与GSE、性格希望呈正相关。与非宗教参与者相比，宗教参与者的倾向性希望和GSE水平更高。较低水平的依恋相关焦虑和宗教虔诚与较高水平的GSE和希望相关。女性的化妆能力高于男性，而男性的FOL能力高于女性。结论:依恋相关焦虑和宗教虔诚是希望和GSE的预测因子。性别差异对FOL和化妆代理有显著影响。此外，我们还发现依恋相关焦虑和回避在GSE和FTO中具有不同的功能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.