Predictive validity of the genderqueer identity scale (GQI): differences between genderqueer, transgender and cisgender sexual minority individuals.

Q1 Social Sciences
International Journal of Transgenderism Pub Date : 2019-01-21 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15532739.2018.1528196
Jory M Catalpa, Jenifer K McGuire, Jessica N Fish, G Nic Rider, Nova Bradford, Dianne Berg
{"title":"Predictive validity of the genderqueer identity scale (GQI): differences between genderqueer, transgender and cisgender sexual minority individuals.","authors":"Jory M Catalpa,&nbsp;Jenifer K McGuire,&nbsp;Jessica N Fish,&nbsp;G Nic Rider,&nbsp;Nova Bradford,&nbsp;Dianne Berg","doi":"10.1080/15532739.2018.1528196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>: The Genderqueer Identity Scale (GQI; McGuire et al., this issue) - a newly developed and validated measure - assesses genderqueer identity via four subscales: <i>challenging the gender binary</i>, the extent to which participants actively work to dismantle gender binaries in identity and expression); <i>social construction of gender,</i> or the degree to which participants interpret their gender identity as something that develops versus an innate essentialist phenomenon; <i>theoretical awareness of gender</i>, the degree of social and political intention attached to gender identity; and <i>gender fluidity</i>, or repeated shifting of gender expression across periods of time. <i>Aim</i>: This descriptive study examined the predictive validity of the GQI and group differences in genderqueer identity with a sample of transgender, genderqueer and nonbinary spectrum, and cisgender sexual minority adults (<i>N</i> = 510). <i>Methods</i>: We hypothesized that Genderqueer Non-binary (GQNB) participants would score higher on GQI subscale scores compared to transgender participants who identify within the gender binary. <i>Results</i>: Results from ANOVA models indicated a statistically significant difference in intrapersonal subscales across sexual minority and transgender binary or genderqueer groups. For the interpersonal subscales there were differences across all three groups. Cisgender sexual minority participants reported the lowest levels on all scales, while genderqueer participants reported the highest, and transgender binary were in-between. <i>Discussion</i>: The GQI demonstrates strong predictive validity in distinguishing binary transpersons from GQNB and cisgender sexual minority persons. Findings reveal that these three subgroups who might otherwise be similarly categorized (i.e., LGBTQ) show significant differences on challenging the binary, social construction, theoretical awareness, and gender fluidity constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgenderism","volume":"20 2-3","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2018.1528196","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgenderism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1528196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Introduction: The Genderqueer Identity Scale (GQI; McGuire et al., this issue) - a newly developed and validated measure - assesses genderqueer identity via four subscales: challenging the gender binary, the extent to which participants actively work to dismantle gender binaries in identity and expression); social construction of gender, or the degree to which participants interpret their gender identity as something that develops versus an innate essentialist phenomenon; theoretical awareness of gender, the degree of social and political intention attached to gender identity; and gender fluidity, or repeated shifting of gender expression across periods of time. Aim: This descriptive study examined the predictive validity of the GQI and group differences in genderqueer identity with a sample of transgender, genderqueer and nonbinary spectrum, and cisgender sexual minority adults (N = 510). Methods: We hypothesized that Genderqueer Non-binary (GQNB) participants would score higher on GQI subscale scores compared to transgender participants who identify within the gender binary. Results: Results from ANOVA models indicated a statistically significant difference in intrapersonal subscales across sexual minority and transgender binary or genderqueer groups. For the interpersonal subscales there were differences across all three groups. Cisgender sexual minority participants reported the lowest levels on all scales, while genderqueer participants reported the highest, and transgender binary were in-between. Discussion: The GQI demonstrates strong predictive validity in distinguishing binary transpersons from GQNB and cisgender sexual minority persons. Findings reveal that these three subgroups who might otherwise be similarly categorized (i.e., LGBTQ) show significant differences on challenging the binary, social construction, theoretical awareness, and gender fluidity constructs.

性别酷儿身份量表(GQI)的预测有效性:性别酷儿、跨性别和顺性别少数性个体之间的差异。
引言:性别酷儿身份量表(GQI;McGuire等人,本期)是一种新开发和验证的测量方法,通过四个分量表评估性别酷儿的身份:挑战性别二元性,参与者在多大程度上积极努力消除身份和表达中的性别二元);性别的社会建构,或者参与者将自己的性别认同解释为与天生的本质主义现象相对发展的东西的程度;理论上的性别意识,社会和政治意愿对性别认同的重视程度;以及性别流动性,或性别表达在一段时间内的反复变化。目的:本描述性研究以跨性别、性别酷儿和非二元谱系以及顺性别性少数群体成年人为样本,检验了GQI和性别酷儿身份的群体差异的预测有效性(N = 510)。方法:我们假设非二元性别酷儿(GQNB)参与者在GQI分量表上的得分高于在性别二元中认同的跨性别参与者。结果:方差分析模型的结果表明,性少数群体和跨性别二元或性别酷儿群体的人际分量表存在统计学上的显著差异。在人际分量表方面,三组之间存在差异。顺性别性少数群体参与者报告的所有量表水平最低,而性别酷儿参与者报告的水平最高,跨性别二元组介于两者之间。讨论:GQI在区分二元变性人与GQNB和顺性别性少数群体方面表现出强大的预测有效性。研究结果表明,这三个可能被类似分类的亚组(即LGBTQ)在挑战二元、社会结构、理论意识和性别流动性结构方面表现出显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transgenderism
International Journal of Transgenderism Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Transgenderism, together with its partner organization the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), offers an international, multidisciplinary scholarly forum for publication in the field of transgender health in its broadest sense for academics, practitioners, policy makers, and the general population. The journal welcomes contributions from a range of disciplines, such as: Endocrinology Surgery Obstetrics and Gynaecology Psychiatry Psychology Speech and language therapy Sexual medicine Sexology Family therapy Public health Sociology Counselling Law Medical ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信