Decreasing Wellbeing and Increasing Use of Negative Coping Strategies: The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the UK Health and Social Care Workforce.

Patricia Gillen, Ruth D Neill, Jill Manthorpe, John Mallett, Heike Schroder, Patricia Nicholl, Denise Currie, John Moriarty, Jermaine Ravalier, Susan McGrory, Paula McFadden
{"title":"Decreasing Wellbeing and Increasing Use of Negative Coping Strategies: The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the UK Health and Social Care Workforce.","authors":"Patricia Gillen, Ruth D Neill, Jill Manthorpe, John Mallett, Heike Schroder, Patricia Nicholl, Denise Currie, John Moriarty, Jermaine Ravalier, Susan McGrory, Paula McFadden","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia3010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many health and social care (HSC) professionals have faced overwhelming pressures throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. As the current situation is constantly changing, and some restrictions across the UK countries such as social distancing and mask wearing in this period (May-July 2021) began to ease, it is important to examine how this workforce has been affected and how employers can help rebuild their services. The aim of this study was to compare cross-sectional data collected from the HSC workforce in the UK at three time points during the COVID-19 pandemic: Phase 1 (May-July 2020), Phase 2 (November 2020-January 2021) and Phase 3 (May-July 2021). Respondents surveyed across the UK (England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) consisted of nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, social care workers and social workers. Wellbeing and work-related quality of life significantly declined from Phase 1 to 3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001); however, no significant difference occurred between Phases 2 and 3 (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Respondents increasingly used negative coping strategies between Phase 1 (May-July 2020) and Phase 3 (May-July 2021), suggesting that the HSC workforce has been negatively impacted by the pandemic. These results have the potential to inform HSC employers' policies, practices, and interventions as the workforce continues to respond to the COVID-19 virus and its legacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"3 1","pages":"26-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia3010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many health and social care (HSC) professionals have faced overwhelming pressures throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. As the current situation is constantly changing, and some restrictions across the UK countries such as social distancing and mask wearing in this period (May-July 2021) began to ease, it is important to examine how this workforce has been affected and how employers can help rebuild their services. The aim of this study was to compare cross-sectional data collected from the HSC workforce in the UK at three time points during the COVID-19 pandemic: Phase 1 (May-July 2020), Phase 2 (November 2020-January 2021) and Phase 3 (May-July 2021). Respondents surveyed across the UK (England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) consisted of nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, social care workers and social workers. Wellbeing and work-related quality of life significantly declined from Phase 1 to 3 (p < 0.001); however, no significant difference occurred between Phases 2 and 3 (p > 0.05). Respondents increasingly used negative coping strategies between Phase 1 (May-July 2020) and Phase 3 (May-July 2021), suggesting that the HSC workforce has been negatively impacted by the pandemic. These results have the potential to inform HSC employers' policies, practices, and interventions as the workforce continues to respond to the COVID-19 virus and its legacy.

幸福感下降,消极应对策略的使用增加:COVID-19大流行对英国卫生和社会护理人员的影响》(The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the UK Health and Social Care Workforce)。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多医疗和社会护理 (HSC) 专业人员都面临着巨大的压力。由于当前的形势在不断变化,而且在此期间(2021 年 5 月至 7 月),英国各地的一些限制措施(如社交疏远和佩戴口罩)开始放松,因此研究这支队伍受到了怎样的影响以及雇主如何帮助他们重建服务非常重要。本研究旨在比较在 COVID-19 大流行期间的三个时间点从英国 HSC 劳动力收集到的横截面数据:第一阶段(2020 年 5 月至 7 月)、第二阶段(2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月)和第三阶段(2021 年 5 月至 7 月)。在英国各地(英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰、北爱尔兰)接受调查的受访者包括护士、助产士、专职医疗人员、社会护理人员和社会工作者。从第 1 阶段到第 3 阶段,幸福感和与工作相关的生活质量明显下降(p < 0.001);但第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段之间无明显差异(p > 0.05)。在第一阶段(2020 年 5 月至 7 月)和第三阶段(2021 年 5 月至 7 月)之间,受访者越来越多地使用消极的应对策略,这表明人类健康服务中心的工作人员受到了大流行病的负面影响。这些结果有可能为造血干细胞雇主的政策、实践和干预措施提供参考,因为造血干细胞工作者将继续应对 COVID-19 病毒及其遗留问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信