Risk of Secondary Household Transmission of COVID-19 from Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Spain.

Miren Remón-Berrade, Sara Guillen-Aguinaga, Isabel Sarrate-Adot, Maria Pilar Garcia-Garcia, Maria Del Carmen Lerga-Berruezo, Laura Guillen-Aguinaga, Francisco Guillen-Grima
{"title":"Risk of Secondary Household Transmission of COVID-19 from Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Spain.","authors":"Miren Remón-Berrade, Sara Guillen-Aguinaga, Isabel Sarrate-Adot, Maria Pilar Garcia-Garcia, Maria Del Carmen Lerga-Berruezo, Laura Guillen-Aguinaga, Francisco Guillen-Grima","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia3010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital health care workers are at high risk of developing COVID-19 and transmitting the disease to their family upon returning home; the aim here is to estimate the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in household contacts of health care workers and their transmission risk factors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>COVID-19 cases in the health care workers of an academic hospital in Pamplona, Spain, from 2 March to 26 May 2020, were followed up. The secondary attack rate (SAR) was estimated from cases in household contacts of index cases and their risk factors by Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 index cases were studied from 99 notified cases in health care workers (89.0%), excluding secondary cases or those who lived alone. Forty-six secondary cases confirmed by the laboratory were found among 326 household contacts, a secondary attack rate of 14.11% (95% CI 10.75-18.31), and 33 household contacts with acute infection symptoms without microbiologic confirmation 10.12% (95% CI 7.30-13.87). Considering all the cases, the secondary attack rate was 27.3 (95% CI 22.75-32.38). Risk factors were the gender and profession of the index case, the number of people living in the household, and the number of persons per bedroom. When the index case health worker used a single room, it had a protective effect, with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.493 (95% CI 0.246-0.985); Conclusions: The secondary attack rate found among household contacts of health care workers is high. The preventive isolation of health care workers in individual rooms in their house may reduce the transmission in their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia3010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital health care workers are at high risk of developing COVID-19 and transmitting the disease to their family upon returning home; the aim here is to estimate the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in household contacts of health care workers and their transmission risk factors.

Material and methods: COVID-19 cases in the health care workers of an academic hospital in Pamplona, Spain, from 2 March to 26 May 2020, were followed up. The secondary attack rate (SAR) was estimated from cases in household contacts of index cases and their risk factors by Poisson regression.

Results: 89 index cases were studied from 99 notified cases in health care workers (89.0%), excluding secondary cases or those who lived alone. Forty-six secondary cases confirmed by the laboratory were found among 326 household contacts, a secondary attack rate of 14.11% (95% CI 10.75-18.31), and 33 household contacts with acute infection symptoms without microbiologic confirmation 10.12% (95% CI 7.30-13.87). Considering all the cases, the secondary attack rate was 27.3 (95% CI 22.75-32.38). Risk factors were the gender and profession of the index case, the number of people living in the household, and the number of persons per bedroom. When the index case health worker used a single room, it had a protective effect, with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.493 (95% CI 0.246-0.985); Conclusions: The secondary attack rate found among household contacts of health care workers is high. The preventive isolation of health care workers in individual rooms in their house may reduce the transmission in their families.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

西班牙一家医院的医护人员二次家庭传播 COVID-19 的风险。
背景:医院医护人员是COVID-19的高危人群,回国后会将疾病传染给家人;本文旨在估算医护人员家庭接触者的COVID-19二次发病率及其传播风险因素:对西班牙潘普洛纳一家学术医院的医护人员在 2020 年 3 月 2 日至 5 月 26 日期间感染 COVID-19 的病例进行了跟踪调查。通过泊松回归法,从指数病例的家庭接触者病例及其风险因素中估算出二次发病率(SAR):从医护人员通报的 99 例病例中研究了 89 例指数病例(89.0%),不包括继发病例或独居病例。在 326 名家庭接触者中发现了 46 例经实验室确诊的继发病例,继发发病率为 14.11%(95% CI 10.75-18.31),33 名有急性感染症状但未经微生物学确诊的家庭接触者的继发发病率为 10.12%(95% CI 7.30-13.87)。考虑到所有病例,二次发病率为 27.3(95% CI 22.75-32.38)。风险因素包括病例的性别和职业、家庭居住人数以及每间卧室的人数。当病例医务人员使用单人间时,具有保护作用,发病率比(IRR)为 0.493 (95% CI 0.246-0.985);结论:当病例医务人员使用单人间时,具有保护作用,发病率比(IRR)为 0.493 (95% CI 0.246-0.985):在医护人员的家庭接触者中发现的二次发病率很高。将医护人员隔离在家中的单独房间进行预防性隔离可减少其家人中的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信