Peer review chair report: Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference 2023 peer review process.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

Journal of Chiropractic Education Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.7899/JCE-23-20

Claire Johnson

{"title":"Peer review chair report: Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference 2023 peer review process.","authors":"Claire Johnson","doi":"10.7899/JCE-23-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the methods used and feedback from reviewers about the peer review process for the 2023 Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference (ACC-RAC).Methods: After the peer review process was complete, the 2023 ACC-RAC peer review committee members were invited to provide feedback through an anonymous electronic form. The survey included a Likert scale to rate items about the peer review process and an option for open-ended comments.Results: Of the 166 peer reviewers, 77 (46%) completed the survey. The reviewers represented 9 countries, with the greatest number from North America. The majority (95%) of respondents rated the process of peer review in topic groups as good to excellent, and the majority (92%) of respondents rated the overall 2023 peer review process as good to excellent. The critical comments that were submitted are addressed in this report.Conclusion: Overall, peer reviewer satisfaction with the process used for the 2023 ACC-RAC was high. We will include information from this report as part of the continuous quality improvement of peer review process, an important part of improving chiropractic education, research, and scholarly activities.","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":" ","pages":"182-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-23-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the methods used and feedback from reviewers about the peer review process for the 2023 Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference (ACC-RAC).

Methods: After the peer review process was complete, the 2023 ACC-RAC peer review committee members were invited to provide feedback through an anonymous electronic form. The survey included a Likert scale to rate items about the peer review process and an option for open-ended comments.

Results: Of the 166 peer reviewers, 77 (46%) completed the survey. The reviewers represented 9 countries, with the greatest number from North America. The majority (95%) of respondents rated the process of peer review in topic groups as good to excellent, and the majority (92%) of respondents rated the overall 2023 peer review process as good to excellent. The critical comments that were submitted are addressed in this report.

Conclusion: Overall, peer reviewer satisfaction with the process used for the 2023 ACC-RAC was high. We will include information from this report as part of the continuous quality improvement of peer review process, an important part of improving chiropractic education, research, and scholarly activities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

同行评审主席报告：脊医学院协会2023年教育会议和研究议程会议同行评审过程。

目的：本报告旨在总结2023年脊医学院协会教育会议和研究议程会议（ACC-RAC）的同行评审过程中使用的方法和评审员的反馈。方法：同行评审过程完成后，2023名ACC-RAC同行评审委员会成员被邀请通过匿名电子表格提供反馈。该调查包括一个Likert量表，用于对同行评审过程中的项目进行评分，以及一个开放式评论选项。结果：在166名同行评审员中，77人（46%）完成了调查。评审员代表了9个国家，其中来自北美的人数最多。大多数（95%）受访者将主题组的同行评审过程评为良好至优秀，大多数（92%）受访者将2023年的总体同行评审过程评价为良好至卓越。本报告阐述了提交的批评意见。结论：总体而言，同行评审员对2023年ACC-RAC所用流程的满意度很高。我们将纳入本报告中的信息，作为同行评审过程持续质量改进的一部分，这是改进脊骨神经医学教育、研究和学术活动的重要组成部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

37.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.