What is the role of up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma?

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anita Kumar
{"title":"What is the role of up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma?","authors":"Anita Kumar","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2022000333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the established standard of care for younger, transplant-eligible MCL patients and is associated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. However, there is no randomized controlled trial data, with therapy including rituximab and cytarabine, that has established a PFS and overall survival (OS) benefit with ASCT in the modern era. Multiple retrospective studies have failed to identify an OS benefit associated with ASCT in younger MCL patients. The high-risk patient subgroup with evidence of baseline TP53 mutation has a dismal outcome with intensive chemoimmunotherapy followed by ASCT, thus up-front ASCT is not optimal for this patient subset. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will help to clarify the role of up-front ASCT in the future. For example, the ongoing European MCL Network Triangle study incorporating ibrutinib into chemoimmunotherapy induction and maintenance with and without ASCT will help define the role of ASCT in the era of novel biologically targeted agents (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02858258). Additionally, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is a powerful prognostic tool in MCL, and the ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network E4151 study is comparing maintenance rituximab alone vs ASCT consolidation in MCL patients who achieve remission and MRD-undetectable status post induction (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267433). ASCT remains a highly efficacious initial therapy for younger MCL patients; however, ultimately the decision to pursue ASCT requires discussion of risks vs benefits, incorporating patient preferences and values.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2022 1","pages":"155-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820454/pdf/hem.2022000333.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2022000333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the established standard of care for younger, transplant-eligible MCL patients and is associated with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. However, there is no randomized controlled trial data, with therapy including rituximab and cytarabine, that has established a PFS and overall survival (OS) benefit with ASCT in the modern era. Multiple retrospective studies have failed to identify an OS benefit associated with ASCT in younger MCL patients. The high-risk patient subgroup with evidence of baseline TP53 mutation has a dismal outcome with intensive chemoimmunotherapy followed by ASCT, thus up-front ASCT is not optimal for this patient subset. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will help to clarify the role of up-front ASCT in the future. For example, the ongoing European MCL Network Triangle study incorporating ibrutinib into chemoimmunotherapy induction and maintenance with and without ASCT will help define the role of ASCT in the era of novel biologically targeted agents (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02858258). Additionally, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is a powerful prognostic tool in MCL, and the ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network E4151 study is comparing maintenance rituximab alone vs ASCT consolidation in MCL patients who achieve remission and MRD-undetectable status post induction (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267433). ASCT remains a highly efficacious initial therapy for younger MCL patients; however, ultimately the decision to pursue ASCT requires discussion of risks vs benefits, incorporating patient preferences and values.

预先自体干细胞移植在套细胞淋巴瘤中的作用是什么?
预先自体干细胞移植(ASCT)是年轻、符合移植条件的MCL患者的既定护理标准,并与延长无进展生存期(PFS)相关。然而,没有随机对照试验数据,包括利妥昔单抗和阿糖胞苷在内的治疗,在现代建立ASCT的PFS和总生存期(OS)获益。多个回顾性研究未能确定ASCT对年轻MCL患者的OS益处。有证据表明基线TP53突变的高危患者亚组在强化化疗免疫治疗后进行ASCT治疗的结果不佳,因此对该患者亚组来说,预先ASCT不是最佳选择。正在进行的随机临床试验将有助于在未来阐明预先ASCT的作用。例如,正在进行的欧洲MCL网络三角研究将ibrutinib纳入有或无ASCT的化学免疫治疗诱导和维持,将有助于确定ASCT在新型生物靶向药物时代的作用(ClinicalTrials.gov标识:NCT02858258)。此外,最小残留病(MRD)评估是MCL的一个强大的预后工具,正在进行的东方肿瘤合作组织-美国放射学院成像网络E4151研究比较了在诱导后达到缓解和MRD不可检测状态的MCL患者中,单抗维持与ASCT巩固(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03267433)。ASCT仍然是年轻MCL患者的一种非常有效的初始治疗;然而,最终决定进行ASCT需要讨论风险与收益,结合患者的偏好和价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信