Helping Surgeons’ Hands: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Ergonomic Instruments

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Helping Surgeons’ Hands: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Ergonomic Instruments","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>“Ergonomic” is a common descriptor for a desk or computer workspace but is a term rarely used to describe a surgical instrument. Instead, surgeons spend many hours in inconvenient positions, often using instruments that are not ergonomic. Improving the ergonomics of surgical instruments may decrease the required force for simple tasks and allow for more efficient surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of ergonomic surgical instruments, the authors developed ergonomic screwdriver handles. The shape and size of these handles were engineered using previous dental studies and 3-dimensional modeling to create an ideal handle for specific glove sizes. Participants were recruited to test 3 different ergonomic handle sizes against a standard screwdriver while assessing digital peak force, digital contact area, and participant preference. Ten participants (3 women) with glove sizes ranging from 6 to 8 were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ergonomic screwdriver handles sized for glove sizes 6 and 7 required significantly less thumb peak force than the standard screwdriver for all participants (702 N for glove size 6 and 567 N for glove size 7 ergonomic screwdrivers, vs 1780 N for “one size fits all” standard screwdriver). Participants consistently preferred screwdrivers that required lower thumb and index finger forces. All ergonomic handles required lower thumb and index finger force. Eighty percent of participants preferred a screwdriver modeled within 1 glove size of their own.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Improved ergonomic handles require less force and are preferred by surgeons.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>The significant decrease in thumb peak force for glove sizes 6 and 7 suggests that there is room for ergonomic improvement in instruments, especially for surgeons with smaller hands. Manufacturing ergonomic screwdriver handles and using the evolving convenience of 3-dimensional printing may help to develop a more comfortable work environment for surgeons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502322007675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

“Ergonomic” is a common descriptor for a desk or computer workspace but is a term rarely used to describe a surgical instrument. Instead, surgeons spend many hours in inconvenient positions, often using instruments that are not ergonomic. Improving the ergonomics of surgical instruments may decrease the required force for simple tasks and allow for more efficient surgery.

Methods

To evaluate the impact of ergonomic surgical instruments, the authors developed ergonomic screwdriver handles. The shape and size of these handles were engineered using previous dental studies and 3-dimensional modeling to create an ideal handle for specific glove sizes. Participants were recruited to test 3 different ergonomic handle sizes against a standard screwdriver while assessing digital peak force, digital contact area, and participant preference. Ten participants (3 women) with glove sizes ranging from 6 to 8 were evaluated.

Results

Ergonomic screwdriver handles sized for glove sizes 6 and 7 required significantly less thumb peak force than the standard screwdriver for all participants (702 N for glove size 6 and 567 N for glove size 7 ergonomic screwdrivers, vs 1780 N for “one size fits all” standard screwdriver). Participants consistently preferred screwdrivers that required lower thumb and index finger forces. All ergonomic handles required lower thumb and index finger force. Eighty percent of participants preferred a screwdriver modeled within 1 glove size of their own.

Conclusions

Improved ergonomic handles require less force and are preferred by surgeons.

Clinical relevance

The significant decrease in thumb peak force for glove sizes 6 and 7 suggests that there is room for ergonomic improvement in instruments, especially for surgeons with smaller hands. Manufacturing ergonomic screwdriver handles and using the evolving convenience of 3-dimensional printing may help to develop a more comfortable work environment for surgeons.

帮助外科医生的手:人体工学器械的生物力学评估。
目的:"符合人体工学 "是对办公桌或电脑工作空间的常见描述,但却很少用于描述手术器械。相反,外科医生经常使用不符合人体工程学的器械,在不方便的位置上花费大量时间。改善手术器械的人体工学设计可减少简单任务所需的力量,提高手术效率:为了评估符合人体工程学的手术器械的影响,作者开发了符合人体工程学的螺丝刀手柄。这些手柄的形状和尺寸是利用以前的牙科研究和三维建模设计的,目的是为特定尺寸的手套设计出理想的手柄。在评估数字峰值力、数字接触面积和参与者偏好的同时,招募参与者测试 3 种不同人体工学手柄尺寸与标准螺丝刀的对比。10 名参与者(3 名女性)的手套尺寸从 6 到 8 不等:结果:对于所有参与者而言,手套尺寸为 6 号和 7 号的人体工学螺丝刀手柄所需的拇指峰值力明显小于标准螺丝刀(手套尺寸为 6 号的人体工学螺丝刀为 702 牛顿,手套尺寸为 7 号的人体工学螺丝刀为 567 牛顿,而 "一刀切 "的标准螺丝刀为 1780 牛顿)。参与者一致偏好需要拇指和食指用力较小的螺丝刀。所有符合人体工程学的手柄都需要较小的拇指和食指力。80%的参与者倾向于使用与自己的手套尺寸相近的螺丝刀:结论:改进后的人体工学手柄所需的力量更小,更受外科医生青睐:临床相关性:6 号和 7 号手套的拇指峰值力明显降低,这表明器械的人体工学仍有改进空间,尤其是对于手较小的外科医生而言。制造符合人体工程学的螺丝刀手柄,并利用三维打印技术不断发展的便利性,可能有助于为外科医生创造更舒适的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信