Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY
Jason S Hoellwarth, Taylor J Reif, S Robert Rozbruch
{"title":"Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.","authors":"Jason S Hoellwarth,&nbsp;Taylor J Reif,&nbsp;S Robert Rozbruch","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Press-fit transfemoral osseointegration is the technique of inserting an intramedullary metal implant into the residual femur of an amputee; the implant is passed transcutaneously to attach to a standard prosthesis that includes a knee, tibia, ankle, and foot. This allows the prosthesis to be skeletally anchored, eliminating socket-related problems such as tissue compression that can provoke neurogenic pain, skin abrasion, and fitting problems resulting from residual limb size fluctuation<sup>1</sup>. Amputees with osseointegrated prostheses typically wear their prosthesis more and experience better mobility, quality of life, and extremity proprioception compared to those with socket prostheses<sup>2-4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>We demonstrate the fundamentals of a single-stage procedure involving an impacted press-fit porous-coated titanium osseointegration implant. The preoperative evaluation is summarized and the specific surgical steps are described: exposure, osteotomy, canal preparation, implant insertion, (optional) targeted muscle reinnervation, muscle closure, soft-tissue contouring and stoma creation, and abutment insertion.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Amputees who are dissatisfied with their quality of life or mobility when using a socket prosthesis can attempt to modify their socket or activity level or accept their situation. Non-osseointegration surgical options to try to improve socket fit include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. An alternative design is a screw-type osseointegration implant<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Press-fit osseointegration can be provided for amputees having difficulty with socket wear<sup>5</sup>. Press-fit osseointegration usually provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options for patients expressing dissatisfaction for reasons such as those mentioned above, including poor fit, compromised energy transfer, skin pinching, compression, and abrasions.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with a socket prosthesis<sup>3,4</sup>. In a recent study<sup>2</sup> of 18 femoral and 13 tibial amputees who had osseointegration, Reif et al. showed significant improvements in prosthesis wear time, mobility, and multiple quality-of-life surveys at a mean follow-up of nearly 2 years. The most common postoperative complication for this procedure is low-grade soft-tissue infection, which is usually managed by a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to manage infection. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be managed with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>Template and choose an implant with an optimal diameter that encroaches the inner cortex at the narrowest bone diameter; an implant that is too wide may not fit without causing a large fracture, and an implant that is too narrow may fall out. Do not cement the implant<sup>7</sup>.Ideally, the abutment of the implant should rest against a flat transverse bone end with cortical contact and leave the correct amount of room for the prosthetic knee so that it matches the height of the contralateral knee; avoid inserting an implant too distally or in too wide a metaphyseal flare.Gentle impaction pressure is necessary and small contained distal fractures are acceptable, but avoid causing a propagating fracture. Do not place cerclage cables or loose bone graft at these small fracture sites.Avoid the use of a tourniquet during intramedullary reaming to prevent potential heat-induced osteonecrosis.Nerve surgery such as targeted muscle reinnervation, if indicated, can be performed in the same surgical episode as the osseointegration.The muscles should be closed at the bone-implant interface with use of a tight purse string in order to provide a vascularized tissue barrier against bacterial ingress<sup>8</sup>.The skin surrounding the stoma should have unnecessary fat removed, but not excess removal leading to skin necrosis. The skin fascia should be sutured to the muscle surrounding the stoma to stabilize the peri-stomal skin.Soft-tissue contouring is needed to achieve the optimal soft-tissue tension around the stoma and abutment. Single-stage surgery has a distinct advantage in this regard.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>MVA = motor vehicle accidentAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyTMR = targeted muscle reinnervationQTFA = Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral AmputationEQ-5D = EuroQol 5 DimensionsLD-SRS = Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (questionnaire)PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/07/jxt-12-e21.00068.PMC9889284.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Press-fit transfemoral osseointegration is the technique of inserting an intramedullary metal implant into the residual femur of an amputee; the implant is passed transcutaneously to attach to a standard prosthesis that includes a knee, tibia, ankle, and foot. This allows the prosthesis to be skeletally anchored, eliminating socket-related problems such as tissue compression that can provoke neurogenic pain, skin abrasion, and fitting problems resulting from residual limb size fluctuation1. Amputees with osseointegrated prostheses typically wear their prosthesis more and experience better mobility, quality of life, and extremity proprioception compared to those with socket prostheses2-4.

Description: We demonstrate the fundamentals of a single-stage procedure involving an impacted press-fit porous-coated titanium osseointegration implant. The preoperative evaluation is summarized and the specific surgical steps are described: exposure, osteotomy, canal preparation, implant insertion, (optional) targeted muscle reinnervation, muscle closure, soft-tissue contouring and stoma creation, and abutment insertion.

Alternatives: Amputees who are dissatisfied with their quality of life or mobility when using a socket prosthesis can attempt to modify their socket or activity level or accept their situation. Non-osseointegration surgical options to try to improve socket fit include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. An alternative design is a screw-type osseointegration implant1.

Rationale: Press-fit osseointegration can be provided for amputees having difficulty with socket wear5. Press-fit osseointegration usually provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options for patients expressing dissatisfaction for reasons such as those mentioned above, including poor fit, compromised energy transfer, skin pinching, compression, and abrasions.

Expected outcomes: Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with a socket prosthesis3,4. In a recent study2 of 18 femoral and 13 tibial amputees who had osseointegration, Reif et al. showed significant improvements in prosthesis wear time, mobility, and multiple quality-of-life surveys at a mean follow-up of nearly 2 years. The most common postoperative complication for this procedure is low-grade soft-tissue infection, which is usually managed by a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to manage infection. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be managed with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention6.

Important tips: Template and choose an implant with an optimal diameter that encroaches the inner cortex at the narrowest bone diameter; an implant that is too wide may not fit without causing a large fracture, and an implant that is too narrow may fall out. Do not cement the implant7.Ideally, the abutment of the implant should rest against a flat transverse bone end with cortical contact and leave the correct amount of room for the prosthetic knee so that it matches the height of the contralateral knee; avoid inserting an implant too distally or in too wide a metaphyseal flare.Gentle impaction pressure is necessary and small contained distal fractures are acceptable, but avoid causing a propagating fracture. Do not place cerclage cables or loose bone graft at these small fracture sites.Avoid the use of a tourniquet during intramedullary reaming to prevent potential heat-induced osteonecrosis.Nerve surgery such as targeted muscle reinnervation, if indicated, can be performed in the same surgical episode as the osseointegration.The muscles should be closed at the bone-implant interface with use of a tight purse string in order to provide a vascularized tissue barrier against bacterial ingress8.The skin surrounding the stoma should have unnecessary fat removed, but not excess removal leading to skin necrosis. The skin fascia should be sutured to the muscle surrounding the stoma to stabilize the peri-stomal skin.Soft-tissue contouring is needed to achieve the optimal soft-tissue tension around the stoma and abutment. Single-stage surgery has a distinct advantage in this regard.

Acronyms and abbreviations: MVA = motor vehicle accidentAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyTMR = targeted muscle reinnervationQTFA = Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral AmputationEQ-5D = EuroQol 5 DimensionsLD-SRS = Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (questionnaire)PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

经股截肢者加压骨整合翻修截肢。
压合经股骨骨整合是一种将髓内金属植入到截肢者的残余股骨中的技术;植入物经皮连接到包括膝盖、胫骨、脚踝和脚在内的标准假体上。这使得假体可以在骨骼上固定,消除了与关节窝相关的问题,如可能引起神经源性疼痛的组织压迫、皮肤磨损和由残肢尺寸波动引起的装配问题。与使用窝形假体的截肢者相比,使用骨整合假体的截肢者通常会更多地佩戴假体,并体验到更好的活动能力、生活质量和肢体本体感觉。描述:我们展示了单阶段手术的基本原理,涉及冲击压合多孔涂层钛骨整合种植体。总结了术前评估并描述了具体的手术步骤:暴露、截骨、椎管准备、植入种植体、(可选)靶向肌肉神经重建、肌肉闭合、软组织轮廓和造口以及基台植入。替代方案:当使用假肢时,对生活质量或活动能力不满意的截肢者可以尝试调整其关节窝或活动水平,或接受他们的情况。非骨整合手术的选择包括骨延长和/或软组织轮廓。另一种设计是螺钉式骨整合种植体。原理:加压式骨融合可用于有关节窝佩戴困难的截肢者5。与非手术和其他手术选择相比,压合式骨整合通常能提供更好的活动能力和生活质量,以满足因上述原因(包括配合不良、能量转移受损、皮肤挤压、压迫和擦伤)而表达不满的患者。预期结果:描述骨整合临床结果的综述文章一致表明,与使用窝形假体的患者相比,患者的假体磨损时间、活动能力和生活质量都有所改善3,4。在最近一项对18名股骨和13名胫骨截肢者进行骨整合的研究中,Reif等人在平均近2年的随访中发现,假体佩戴时间、活动能力和多次生活质量调查均有显著改善。这种手术最常见的术后并发症是轻度软组织感染,通常通过短期口服抗生素治疗。更少情况下,可能需要软组织清创或植入物移除来控制感染。假体周围骨折几乎总是可以通过熟悉的骨折固定技术和假体保留来治疗。重要提示:模板和选择一个最佳直径的种植体,在最窄的骨直径处侵占内皮质;太宽的植入物可能不适合而不引起大骨折,太窄的植入物可能脱落。不要固定种植体。理想情况下,植入体的基台应该靠在平坦的横骨末端,并与皮质接触,并为假膝留出适当的空间,使其与对侧膝关节的高度相匹配;避免植入过远或过宽的干骺端闪光处。温和的内压是必要的,小的远端骨折是可以接受的,但要避免造成扩展性骨折。不要在这些小骨折部位放置环扎电缆或松动的骨移植物。髓内扩孔时避免使用止血带,以防止潜在的热致骨坏死。神经外科手术如定向肌肉神经移植,如有指征,可与骨整合手术同时进行。为了提供一个血管化的组织屏障,防止细菌侵入,应在骨-植入物界面处用紧的荷包线将肌肉闭合。应将瘘口周围的皮肤去除不必要的脂肪,但不能去除过多的脂肪导致皮肤坏死。皮肤筋膜应与口周围的肌肉缝合以稳定口周皮肤。需要软组织轮廓来达到最佳的软组织张力周围的造口和基台。单阶段手术在这方面有明显的优势。缩略语:MVA =机动车事故ap =正位体ct =计算机断层扫描tmr =靶向肌肉再神经qtfa =经股截肢者问卷eq - 5d = EuroQol 5 dimensionsd - srs =肢体畸形-脊柱侧凸研究协会(问卷)PROMIS =患者报告的结果测量信息系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信