COVID-19: A Single-Center ICU Experience of the First Wave in the Philippines.

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/7510306
Onion Gerald V Ubaldo, Jose Emmanuel M Palo, Jude Erric L Cinco
{"title":"COVID-19: A Single-Center ICU Experience of the First Wave in the Philippines.","authors":"Onion Gerald V Ubaldo, Jose Emmanuel M Palo, Jude Erric L Cinco","doi":"10.1155/2021/7510306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared the novel coronavirus of 2019 a pandemic, causing millions of cases and thousands of deaths worldwide, exposing the vulnerabilities of healthcare systems around the world with each country having its own experience. These ranged from patient clinical profiles to management recommendations and to government interventions. There is a paucity of published data regarding Philippine experience. This study is a retrospective, descriptive study of ninety-one COVID-19 probable patients admitted in the COVID ICU of The Medical City from March 16 to May 7, 2020. We described clinical and demographic characteristics amongst COVID-19-confirmed and -negative patients. Therapeutic interventions including COVID-19 investigational drug use and other organ failure strategies were noted and tested for association with ICU survivors and nonsurvivors. We observed that there was no therapeutic intervention that was associated with improved outcomes, with some interventions showing trends favoring the ICU nonsurvivor group. These interventions include, but are not limited to, the use of hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab, and prone positioning. We also observed that a higher SAPS-3 score was associated with the COVID-19 positive group and the ICU nonsurvivor group. On PubMed search, there seems to be no Philippine-specific literature regarding COVID-19 ICU experience. Further investigations to include more variables are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"7510306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870312/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7510306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared the novel coronavirus of 2019 a pandemic, causing millions of cases and thousands of deaths worldwide, exposing the vulnerabilities of healthcare systems around the world with each country having its own experience. These ranged from patient clinical profiles to management recommendations and to government interventions. There is a paucity of published data regarding Philippine experience. This study is a retrospective, descriptive study of ninety-one COVID-19 probable patients admitted in the COVID ICU of The Medical City from March 16 to May 7, 2020. We described clinical and demographic characteristics amongst COVID-19-confirmed and -negative patients. Therapeutic interventions including COVID-19 investigational drug use and other organ failure strategies were noted and tested for association with ICU survivors and nonsurvivors. We observed that there was no therapeutic intervention that was associated with improved outcomes, with some interventions showing trends favoring the ICU nonsurvivor group. These interventions include, but are not limited to, the use of hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab, and prone positioning. We also observed that a higher SAPS-3 score was associated with the COVID-19 positive group and the ICU nonsurvivor group. On PubMed search, there seems to be no Philippine-specific literature regarding COVID-19 ICU experience. Further investigations to include more variables are recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2019冠状病毒病:菲律宾第一波单中心重症监护经验
2020年1月30日,世界卫生组织宣布2019年新型冠状病毒为大流行,在全球范围内造成数百万病例和数千人死亡,暴露了世界各国医疗保健系统的脆弱性,每个国家都有自己的经历。这些建议包括从患者临床概况到管理建议和政府干预措施。关于菲律宾经验的公开数据很少。本研究对2020年3月16日至5月7日在医学城新冠肺炎重症监护室收治的91例新冠肺炎疑似患者进行回顾性描述性研究。我们描述了covid -19确诊和阴性患者的临床和人口统计学特征。包括COVID-19研究药物使用和其他器官衰竭策略在内的治疗干预措施被注意到并测试了与ICU幸存者和非幸存者的关联。我们观察到,没有治疗性干预与改善预后相关,一些干预显示出有利于ICU非幸存者组的趋势。这些干预措施包括但不限于使用羟氯喹和托珠单抗,以及俯卧位。我们还观察到,更高的sap -3评分与COVID-19阳性组和ICU非幸存者组相关。在PubMed搜索中,似乎没有针对菲律宾的关于COVID-19 ICU经验的文献。建议进一步调查以纳入更多变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信