The Role of Relationship Conflict for Momentary Loneliness and Affect in the Daily Lives of Older Couples.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Elisa Weber, Gizem Hülür
{"title":"The Role of Relationship Conflict for Momentary Loneliness and Affect in the Daily Lives of Older Couples.","authors":"Elisa Weber,&nbsp;Gizem Hülür","doi":"10.1177/02654075221138022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intimate partner relationships foster individuals' well-being throughout the lifespan. However, dissatisfying or conflict-laden relationships can have a detrimental impact on well-being and relationship quality. The majority of older adults live together with a spouse/partner, and intimate relationships are one of the most important social contexts in their daily lives. <b>Purpose:</b> Expanding on previous research, we examined the role of previous conflict on experiences of loneliness and affect in the daily lives of older partners from a dyadic perspective. Relationship duration and quality, personality traits (neuroticism and extraversion), conflict frequency during the measurement period, physical health as well as age were considered as moderators. <b>Study Sample and Data Analysis:</b> We used data from an experience sampling study with 151 older heterosexual couples (302 participants; 65+ years old) reporting on their positive and negative affect, loneliness, and previous experience of relationship conflict 6 times a day for 14 days. Data were analyzed using dyadic multilevel models. <b>Results:</b> For both men and women within couples, previous conflict was associated with an increased experience of negative affect and loneliness and a decreased experience of positive affect. Higher neuroticism predicted less positive and more negative affect following conflict for women and more loneliness for men. Higher relationship satisfaction predicted less increase in negative affect after conflict for female partners. Age, relationship duration, physical health, extraversion, and the number of conflict episodes showed no moderating effects. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results support the notion that relationship conflict deteriorates emotional well-being in old age and renders older adults lonelier even in the context of intimate partner relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221138022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner relationships foster individuals' well-being throughout the lifespan. However, dissatisfying or conflict-laden relationships can have a detrimental impact on well-being and relationship quality. The majority of older adults live together with a spouse/partner, and intimate relationships are one of the most important social contexts in their daily lives. Purpose: Expanding on previous research, we examined the role of previous conflict on experiences of loneliness and affect in the daily lives of older partners from a dyadic perspective. Relationship duration and quality, personality traits (neuroticism and extraversion), conflict frequency during the measurement period, physical health as well as age were considered as moderators. Study Sample and Data Analysis: We used data from an experience sampling study with 151 older heterosexual couples (302 participants; 65+ years old) reporting on their positive and negative affect, loneliness, and previous experience of relationship conflict 6 times a day for 14 days. Data were analyzed using dyadic multilevel models. Results: For both men and women within couples, previous conflict was associated with an increased experience of negative affect and loneliness and a decreased experience of positive affect. Higher neuroticism predicted less positive and more negative affect following conflict for women and more loneliness for men. Higher relationship satisfaction predicted less increase in negative affect after conflict for female partners. Age, relationship duration, physical health, extraversion, and the number of conflict episodes showed no moderating effects. Conclusions: Our results support the notion that relationship conflict deteriorates emotional well-being in old age and renders older adults lonelier even in the context of intimate partner relationships.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关系冲突对老年夫妇日常生活中短暂孤独和情感的作用。
背景:亲密的伴侣关系能促进个人一生的幸福。然而,不满意或充满冲突的关系会对幸福和关系质量产生有害影响。大多数老年人与配偶/伴侣住在一起,亲密关系是他们日常生活中最重要的社会环境之一。目的:在以往研究的基础上,我们从二元视角考察了以往冲突对老年伴侣日常生活中孤独感和情感体验的影响。关系的持续时间和质量、人格特征(神经质和外向性)、测量期间的冲突频率、身体健康和年龄被认为是调节因素。研究样本和数据分析:我们使用了151对老年异性恋夫妇(302名参与者;65岁以上)报告他们的积极和消极的影响,孤独,以及以前的关系冲突经历,每天6次,持续14天。数据分析采用双进多层模型。结果:对于夫妻中的男性和女性来说,之前的冲突与负面影响和孤独感的增加以及积极影响的减少有关。神经质程度越高,女性在冲突后产生的积极影响越少,消极影响越多,男性则越孤独。对于女性伴侣来说,较高的关系满意度预示着冲突后负面影响的增加较少。年龄、关系持续时间、身体健康、外向性和冲突次数没有调节作用。结论:我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即关系冲突会使老年人的情绪健康恶化,即使在亲密伴侣关系的背景下,老年人也会感到孤独。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
187
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信