Practices, knowledge, and attitudes of community pharmacists towards dispensing drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross sectional study from Jordan.

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-06 DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2692
Lobna Gharaibeh, Mariam Ahmad Alameri, Obada A Sibai, Shirin Alfreahat, Fadi Saeed, Murtadha Al Badran, Ahmed Al-Qaisi
{"title":"Practices, knowledge, and attitudes of community pharmacists towards dispensing drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross sectional study from Jordan.","authors":"Lobna Gharaibeh,&nbsp;Mariam Ahmad Alameri,&nbsp;Obada A Sibai,&nbsp;Shirin Alfreahat,&nbsp;Fadi Saeed,&nbsp;Murtadha Al Badran,&nbsp;Ahmed Al-Qaisi","doi":"10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacists have an important role in providing correct information, education, and counseling to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic and other health crisis. In order to perform their duties in a correct manner, they must receive adequate and evidence-based information from official resources.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study were to examine the practices of community pharmacists towards dispensing drugs during the COVI-19 pandemic and assess their knowledge concerning the safety and efficacy of these drugs in managing the COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a web-based cross-sectional study conducted through the distribution of the questionnaire via the social media through a google form. The drugs examined were azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and certain antiviral drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 485 community pharmacists responded to the questionnaire. Pharmacists dispensed these medications based on the physician's orders, 420 (86.6%), according to the pharmacist´s recommendations 327 (67.4%), or upon patient´s request 278 (57.3%). Azithromycin was the most dispensed drug and two thirds of the pharmacists dispensed drugs more than 10 times. Community pharmacists did not possess adequate knowledge concerning the effectiveness and safety of the drugs in the management of COVID-19 infection. In the multivariate linear regression analysis; education, type of university, and the average number of daily customers were statistically significant, p values: 0.004, 0.002, and 0.016, respectively. Pharmacists did not have a positive attitude towards dispensing drugs based on their own recommendations. More than half of the pharmacists agreed that they thought it was a correct decision to give these drugs based on their own judgment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community pharmacists should not receive information from non-official sources. Strict regulations and implementation of disciplinary actions against pharmacists that dispense prescription only drugs based on their medical judgment are necessary to stop this illegal behavior. A proactive role demonstrated by the pharmacists and based on scientific facts will reduce misconceptions and hazardous behavior of self-medication using prescription only drugs based on rumors and fictitious news.</p>","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"20 3","pages":"2692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/96/pharmpract-20-2692.PMC9851824.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists have an important role in providing correct information, education, and counseling to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic and other health crisis. In order to perform their duties in a correct manner, they must receive adequate and evidence-based information from official resources.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to examine the practices of community pharmacists towards dispensing drugs during the COVI-19 pandemic and assess their knowledge concerning the safety and efficacy of these drugs in managing the COVID-19 infection.

Methods: This was a web-based cross-sectional study conducted through the distribution of the questionnaire via the social media through a google form. The drugs examined were azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and certain antiviral drugs.

Results: A total of 485 community pharmacists responded to the questionnaire. Pharmacists dispensed these medications based on the physician's orders, 420 (86.6%), according to the pharmacist´s recommendations 327 (67.4%), or upon patient´s request 278 (57.3%). Azithromycin was the most dispensed drug and two thirds of the pharmacists dispensed drugs more than 10 times. Community pharmacists did not possess adequate knowledge concerning the effectiveness and safety of the drugs in the management of COVID-19 infection. In the multivariate linear regression analysis; education, type of university, and the average number of daily customers were statistically significant, p values: 0.004, 0.002, and 0.016, respectively. Pharmacists did not have a positive attitude towards dispensing drugs based on their own recommendations. More than half of the pharmacists agreed that they thought it was a correct decision to give these drugs based on their own judgment.

Conclusion: Community pharmacists should not receive information from non-official sources. Strict regulations and implementation of disciplinary actions against pharmacists that dispense prescription only drugs based on their medical judgment are necessary to stop this illegal behavior. A proactive role demonstrated by the pharmacists and based on scientific facts will reduce misconceptions and hazardous behavior of self-medication using prescription only drugs based on rumors and fictitious news.

Abstract Image

新冠肺炎大流行期间社区药剂师对配药的实践、知识和态度:来自约旦的一项横断面研究。
背景:药剂师在新冠肺炎大流行和其他健康危机期间为公众提供正确的信息、教育和咨询方面发挥着重要作用。为了以正确的方式履行职责,他们必须从官方资源中获得充分和循证的信息。目的:本研究的目的是检查社区药剂师在COVI-19大流行期间配药的做法,并评估他们对这些药物在管理新冠肺炎感染方面的安全性和有效性的了解。方法:这是一项基于网络的横断面研究,通过社交媒体通过谷歌表格分发问卷。检查的药物包括阿奇霉素、羟氯喹、地塞米松和某些抗病毒药物。结果:共有485名社区药剂师对问卷进行了回复。药剂师根据医嘱配药420次(86.6%),根据药剂师的建议327次(67.4%),或根据患者的要求278次(57.3%)。阿奇霉素是配药最多的药物,三分之二的药剂师配药次数超过10次。社区药剂师对药物在新冠肺炎感染管理中的有效性和安全性缺乏足够的知识。在多元线性回归分析中;教育程度、大学类型和平均每日顾客数量具有统计学意义,p值分别为:0.004、0.002和0.016。药剂师并没有根据自己的建议对配药持积极态度。超过一半的药剂师同意,他们认为根据自己的判断给药是正确的决定。结论:社区药剂师不应接受非官方来源的信息。为了制止这种违法行为,有必要对根据医学判断配制处方药的药剂师制定严格的法规并实施纪律处分。药剂师在科学事实的基础上发挥积极主动的作用,将减少基于谣言和虚构新闻使用处方药的自我用药的误解和危险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信