A cross-sectional survey of English NHS Trusts on their uptake and provision of active bystander training including to address sexual harassment.

Ava Robertson, Sarah Steele
{"title":"A cross-sectional survey of English NHS Trusts on their uptake and provision of active bystander training including to address sexual harassment.","authors":"Ava Robertson,&nbsp;Sarah Steele","doi":"10.1177/20542704231166619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reports identify that sexual harassment is troublingly pervasive in the NHS. Active bystander training (ABT) has been promoted to address sexual harassment, alongside other forms of poor behaviour, discrimination, and harassment. We explore ABT across all English NHS Trusts and determine whether the programmes address sexual misconduct in the training content.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Freedom of Information requests asking whether Trusts offer ABT, and if so, about the programme content and delivery, and to NHS England on centrally commissioned ABT.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>213 NHS Trusts in England, and NHS England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Provision of ABT, and presence of sexual harassment content in the training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>199 Trusts responded by August 2022. Of these, 35 Trusts provide ABT, the majority of which deliver content that is not specific to sexual misconduct, are in London, outsource training using private providers, and only provide workshops on an opt-in basis. One Trust offers a standalone ABT module on sexual harassment. Private providers prohibit Trusts from sharing training material, inhibiting content analysis and evaluation. Among the 163 Trusts without ABT programmes, only 23 (13%) have plans to implement training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ABT is underutilised in the NHS, despite being identified as an effective intervention in other settings like the military, higher education, and government workplaces. Studies should explore whether wider NHS adoption is warranted. Robust monitoring and evaluation processes are critical to strengthening the available literature regarding the effectiveness of ABT in the healthcare context and engaging in global knowledge sharing across health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"14 4","pages":"20542704231166619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164257/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704231166619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: Reports identify that sexual harassment is troublingly pervasive in the NHS. Active bystander training (ABT) has been promoted to address sexual harassment, alongside other forms of poor behaviour, discrimination, and harassment. We explore ABT across all English NHS Trusts and determine whether the programmes address sexual misconduct in the training content.

Design: Freedom of Information requests asking whether Trusts offer ABT, and if so, about the programme content and delivery, and to NHS England on centrally commissioned ABT.

Setting: 213 NHS Trusts in England, and NHS England.

Participants: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure: Provision of ABT, and presence of sexual harassment content in the training.

Results: 199 Trusts responded by August 2022. Of these, 35 Trusts provide ABT, the majority of which deliver content that is not specific to sexual misconduct, are in London, outsource training using private providers, and only provide workshops on an opt-in basis. One Trust offers a standalone ABT module on sexual harassment. Private providers prohibit Trusts from sharing training material, inhibiting content analysis and evaluation. Among the 163 Trusts without ABT programmes, only 23 (13%) have plans to implement training.

Conclusions: ABT is underutilised in the NHS, despite being identified as an effective intervention in other settings like the military, higher education, and government workplaces. Studies should explore whether wider NHS adoption is warranted. Robust monitoring and evaluation processes are critical to strengthening the available literature regarding the effectiveness of ABT in the healthcare context and engaging in global knowledge sharing across health systems.

Abstract Image

英国国民健康保险制度信托的横断面调查他们的吸收和提供积极的旁观者培训,包括解决性骚扰。
目的:报告指出,性骚扰是令人不安的普遍在NHS。积极旁观者培训(ABT)已得到推广,以解决性骚扰以及其他形式的不良行为、歧视和骚扰问题。我们在所有英国NHS信托基金中探索ABT,并确定该计划是否在培训内容中解决性行为不端的问题。设计:信息自由请求,询问信托机构是否提供ABT,如果提供,关于项目内容和交付,并向NHS英格兰进行集中委托的ABT。设置:213个英格兰NHS信托机构和NHS英格兰。参与者:不适用。主要结果测量:提供ABT,以及在培训中存在性骚扰内容。结果:到2022年8月,199家信托公司做出了回应。其中,有35家信托机构提供ABT,其中大多数提供的内容并非针对性行为不端,它们位于伦敦,使用私人提供商外包培训,并且只在选择加入的基础上提供讲习班。One Trust提供了一个关于性骚扰的独立ABT模块。私人供应商禁止信托基金分享培训材料,阻碍了内容分析和评估。在163个没有ABT项目的信托基金中,只有23个(13%)有实施培训的计划。结论:尽管在军事、高等教育和政府工作场所等其他环境中被认为是一种有效的干预措施,但ABT在NHS中的利用不足。研究应该探讨是否有必要更广泛地采用NHS。强有力的监测和评估过程对于加强有关ABT在卫生保健方面有效性的现有文献和参与卫生系统之间的全球知识共享至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信