The Relative Value of Anti-Obesity Medications Compared to Similar Therapies.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nina Kim, Joaquin Estrada, Isabella Chow, Aleksandrina Ruseva, Abhilasha Ramasamy, Chakkarin Burudpakdee, Christopher M Blanchette
{"title":"The Relative Value of Anti-Obesity Medications Compared to Similar Therapies.","authors":"Nina Kim,&nbsp;Joaquin Estrada,&nbsp;Isabella Chow,&nbsp;Aleksandrina Ruseva,&nbsp;Abhilasha Ramasamy,&nbsp;Chakkarin Burudpakdee,&nbsp;Christopher M Blanchette","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S392276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate a need for improved health insurance coverage for anti-obesity medications (AOMs) by comparing clinical and economic benefits of obesity treatments to covered medications for selected therapeutic areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a grey literature search, we identified and prioritized therapeutic areas and treatment analogues for comparison to obesity. A targeted literature review identified clinical and economic outcomes research across the therapeutic area analogues. Associated comorbidities, clinical evidence, indirect costs (ie, absenteeism and productivity loss), and direct medical costs were evaluated to determine the relative value of treating obesity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four therapeutic areas/treatment analogues were selected for comparison to obesity: smoking cessation (varenicline), daytime sleepiness (modafinil), migraines (erenumab), and fibromyalgia (pregabalin). Obesity was associated with 17 comorbidities, more than migraine (9), smoking (8), daytime sleepiness (5), and fibromyalgia (2). Economic burden was greatest for obesity, followed by smoking, with yearly indirect and direct medical costs totaling $676 and $345 billion, respectively. AOMs resulted in cost savings of $2586 in direct medical costs per patient per year (PPPY), greater than that for varenicline at $930 PPPY, modafinil at $1045 PPPY, and erenumab at $468 PPPY; pregabalin utilization increased costs by $924 PPPY. AOMs were covered by 10-16% of United States health insurance plans, compared to 45-59% for the four comparators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to four therapeutic analogues, obesity represented the highest economic burden and was associated with more comorbidities. AOMs provide greater cost savings compared to selected analogues. However, AOMs have limited formulary coverage. Improved coverage of AOMs may increase access to these treatments and may help address the clinical and economic burden associated with obesity and its comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/0e/ceor-15-51.PMC9886521.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S392276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate a need for improved health insurance coverage for anti-obesity medications (AOMs) by comparing clinical and economic benefits of obesity treatments to covered medications for selected therapeutic areas.

Methods: Using a grey literature search, we identified and prioritized therapeutic areas and treatment analogues for comparison to obesity. A targeted literature review identified clinical and economic outcomes research across the therapeutic area analogues. Associated comorbidities, clinical evidence, indirect costs (ie, absenteeism and productivity loss), and direct medical costs were evaluated to determine the relative value of treating obesity.

Results: Four therapeutic areas/treatment analogues were selected for comparison to obesity: smoking cessation (varenicline), daytime sleepiness (modafinil), migraines (erenumab), and fibromyalgia (pregabalin). Obesity was associated with 17 comorbidities, more than migraine (9), smoking (8), daytime sleepiness (5), and fibromyalgia (2). Economic burden was greatest for obesity, followed by smoking, with yearly indirect and direct medical costs totaling $676 and $345 billion, respectively. AOMs resulted in cost savings of $2586 in direct medical costs per patient per year (PPPY), greater than that for varenicline at $930 PPPY, modafinil at $1045 PPPY, and erenumab at $468 PPPY; pregabalin utilization increased costs by $924 PPPY. AOMs were covered by 10-16% of United States health insurance plans, compared to 45-59% for the four comparators.

Conclusion: Compared to four therapeutic analogues, obesity represented the highest economic burden and was associated with more comorbidities. AOMs provide greater cost savings compared to selected analogues. However, AOMs have limited formulary coverage. Improved coverage of AOMs may increase access to these treatments and may help address the clinical and economic burden associated with obesity and its comorbidities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与类似疗法相比,抗肥胖药物的相对价值
目的:通过比较肥胖治疗的临床和经济效益与选定治疗领域的覆盖药物,证明有必要改善抗肥胖药物(AOMs)的健康保险覆盖范围。方法:使用灰色文献检索,我们确定并优先考虑治疗领域和治疗类似物,以与肥胖进行比较。一项有针对性的文献综述确定了跨治疗领域类似物的临床和经济结果研究。评估了相关的合并症、临床证据、间接成本(即旷工和生产力损失)和直接医疗成本,以确定治疗肥胖的相对价值。结果:选择了四个治疗领域/治疗类似物来比较肥胖:戒烟(伐尼克兰),白天嗜睡(莫达非尼),偏头痛(erenumab)和纤维肌痛(普瑞巴林)。肥胖与17种合并症相关,超过偏头痛(9)、吸烟(8)、白天嗜睡(5)和纤维肌痛(2)。肥胖的经济负担最大,其次是吸烟,每年的间接和直接医疗费用分别为6760亿美元和3450亿美元。AOMs导致每位患者每年直接医疗费用节省2586美元,高于伐尼克兰每年930美元、莫达非尼每年1045美元和埃莫奈布每年468美元;普瑞巴林的使用使成本每年增加924美元。美国10-16%的健康保险计划涵盖了非美洲裔美国人,而四个比较国的这一比例为45-59%。结论:与四种治疗类似物相比,肥胖代表着最高的经济负担,并与更多的合并症相关。与选定的类似物相比,AOMs提供了更大的成本节约。但是,AOMs的处方覆盖范围有限。提高AOMs的覆盖率可能会增加获得这些治疗的机会,并可能有助于解决与肥胖及其合并症相关的临床和经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信