Topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers: Development of a content-valid topical fluoride hesitancy identification item pool

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Todd C. Edwards PhD, Adam Carle PhD, MA, Darragh Kerr MPH, Richard M. Carpiano PhD, MPH, Daisy Patiño Nguyen RDH, MS, Joshua C. Orack MPH, Donald L. Chi DDS, PhD
{"title":"Topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers: Development of a content-valid topical fluoride hesitancy identification item pool","authors":"Todd C. Edwards PhD,&nbsp;Adam Carle PhD, MA,&nbsp;Darragh Kerr MPH,&nbsp;Richard M. Carpiano PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Daisy Patiño Nguyen RDH, MS,&nbsp;Joshua C. Orack MPH,&nbsp;Donald L. Chi DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a content-valid set of items to characterize different types of topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers. We will use this information to develop and test tailor-made interventions directed to caregivers with varied types and levels of topical fluoride hesitancy, to ultimately improve child oral health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Caregivers participated in three study activities, in the following order: (1) semi-structured concept elicitation interviews (<i>n</i> = 56), (2) cognitive interviews (<i>n</i> = 9), and (3) usability interviews (<i>n</i> = 3). Interviews were conducted via telephone and audio-recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. Twelve pediatric dental providers and researchers participated in item review. An assessment of reading level of items was made with goal of 6th grade reading level or less.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on elicitation interviews, we initially developed 271 items, which the investigative team evaluated for conceptual clarity, specificity to topical fluoride hesitancy, and sensitivity to potential interventions. After four rounds of review and cognitive interviews, we retained 33 items across five previously identified domains. Changes after cognitive interviews included item revision to improve comprehension and item re-ordering to avoid order effects. Changes after usability testing including clarification regarding referent child for families with multiple children. The reading level of the item pool is grade 3.2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The resulting 33-item fluoride hesitancy item pool is content valid and will address an important need for identifying and addressing topical fluoride hesitancy in the context of dental research and clinical practice. Next steps include psychometric evaluation to assess scale and test–retest reliability and construct validity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"83 1","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jphd.12558","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a content-valid set of items to characterize different types of topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers. We will use this information to develop and test tailor-made interventions directed to caregivers with varied types and levels of topical fluoride hesitancy, to ultimately improve child oral health.

Methods

Caregivers participated in three study activities, in the following order: (1) semi-structured concept elicitation interviews (n = 56), (2) cognitive interviews (n = 9), and (3) usability interviews (n = 3). Interviews were conducted via telephone and audio-recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. Twelve pediatric dental providers and researchers participated in item review. An assessment of reading level of items was made with goal of 6th grade reading level or less.

Results

Based on elicitation interviews, we initially developed 271 items, which the investigative team evaluated for conceptual clarity, specificity to topical fluoride hesitancy, and sensitivity to potential interventions. After four rounds of review and cognitive interviews, we retained 33 items across five previously identified domains. Changes after cognitive interviews included item revision to improve comprehension and item re-ordering to avoid order effects. Changes after usability testing including clarification regarding referent child for families with multiple children. The reading level of the item pool is grade 3.2.

Conclusions

The resulting 33-item fluoride hesitancy item pool is content valid and will address an important need for identifying and addressing topical fluoride hesitancy in the context of dental research and clinical practice. Next steps include psychometric evaluation to assess scale and test–retest reliability and construct validity.

护理人员局部氟化物犹豫:内容有效的局部氟化物犹豫识别项目池的开发
目的开发一套内容有效的项目来表征护理人员不同类型的局部氟化物犹豫。我们将利用这些信息开发和测试针对不同类型和程度的局部氟化物犹豫的护理人员量身定制的干预措施,以最终改善儿童口腔健康。方法护理人员按照半结构化概念启发访谈(n = 56)、认知访谈(n = 9)和可用性访谈(n = 3)的顺序,参与了三项研究活动。访谈是通过电话进行的,录音和转录用于定性分析。12名儿童牙科服务提供者和研究人员参与了项目审查。以六年级阅读水平或以下为目标,对项目的阅读水平进行评估。基于启发性访谈,我们最初开发了271个项目,调查小组评估了这些项目的概念清晰度、对局部氟化物犹豫的特异性以及对潜在干预措施的敏感性。经过四轮回顾和认知访谈,我们保留了先前确定的五个领域的33个项目。认知访谈后的变化包括项目修订以提高理解能力和项目重新排序以避免顺序效应。可用性测试后的变化,包括澄清有多个孩子的家庭的参考孩子。项目池的阅读等级为3.2级。结论所得的33项氟化物犹豫项目库内容有效,将解决牙科研究和临床实践中识别和解决局部氟化物犹豫的重要需求。接下来的步骤包括心理测量评估,以评估量表和重测信度和结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信