A REVIEW OF SUICIDES IN DALMATIA REPORTED IN THE DAILY PRESS BETWEEN TWO WORLD WARS

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Ivo Mišur
{"title":"A REVIEW OF SUICIDES IN DALMATIA REPORTED IN THE DAILY PRESS BETWEEN TWO WORLD WARS","authors":"Ivo Mišur","doi":"10.31952/amha.20.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper analyzed texts of newspaper reports of suicides in Dalmatia that occurred in the period between the two world wars. Words used in headlines were analyzed separately. Suicides were statistically analyzed according to age, gender, method, location, and monthly distribution. Most of the cases were reported during May and June. During 1936 and 1937, there was a rapid increase of suicides in media coverage. There is no evidence that the number of suicides really increased during these years. Statistics show the existence of gender preferences for certain suicide methods. The morning was the most common time of day for suicide in Dalmatia. Newspapers were inappropriate according to today’s WHO instructions. Texts were full of details, the romanticization of suicide and violation of deceased person’s privacy. Results of the research showed that news reports did not cause mass suicide imitations. However, there are cases of individual imitations. In some micro-locations (smaller settlements and their surroundings), there is evidence that some cases were influenced by earlier suicides. However, the time period between original and imitated cases varies from few weeks to ten years. This shows that time is not variable in imitations performed in micro-locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":42656,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","volume":"20 1","pages":"101-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.20.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzed texts of newspaper reports of suicides in Dalmatia that occurred in the period between the two world wars. Words used in headlines were analyzed separately. Suicides were statistically analyzed according to age, gender, method, location, and monthly distribution. Most of the cases were reported during May and June. During 1936 and 1937, there was a rapid increase of suicides in media coverage. There is no evidence that the number of suicides really increased during these years. Statistics show the existence of gender preferences for certain suicide methods. The morning was the most common time of day for suicide in Dalmatia. Newspapers were inappropriate according to today’s WHO instructions. Texts were full of details, the romanticization of suicide and violation of deceased person’s privacy. Results of the research showed that news reports did not cause mass suicide imitations. However, there are cases of individual imitations. In some micro-locations (smaller settlements and their surroundings), there is evidence that some cases were influenced by earlier suicides. However, the time period between original and imitated cases varies from few weeks to ten years. This shows that time is not variable in imitations performed in micro-locations.

两次世界大战期间,日报报道了达尔马提亚的自杀事件
这篇论文分析了两次世界大战之间达尔马提亚发生的自杀事件的报纸报道。标题中使用的词语被分开分析。按年龄、性别、自杀方式、自杀地点、月分布进行统计分析。大多数病例是在5月和6月报告的。在1936年和1937年期间,媒体报道的自杀事件迅速增加。没有证据表明这些年来自杀人数确实增加了。统计数据显示,在某些自杀方式上存在性别偏好。在达尔马提亚,早晨是一天中自杀最常见的时间。根据今天世卫组织的指示,报纸是不合适的。文本充满了细节,将自杀浪漫化,侵犯了死者的隐私。研究结果表明,新闻报道并没有引起集体自杀模仿。然而,也有个别模仿的情况。在一些微型地点(较小的定居点及其周围),有证据表明,有些案件受到早期自杀的影响。然而,原始病例和模拟病例之间的时间间隔从几周到十年不等。这表明在微位置进行模仿时,时间是不变的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信