Incidental gall bladder cancer in the laparoscopic treatment and magnetic resonance imaging era: A single institution experience.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_117_22
Zhou Yong, Li Ang, Zha Wen-Zhang, Wu Xu-Dong, Fan Ren-Gen
{"title":"Incidental gall bladder cancer in the laparoscopic treatment and magnetic resonance imaging era: A single institution experience.","authors":"Zhou Yong, Li Ang, Zha Wen-Zhang, Wu Xu-Dong, Fan Ren-Gen","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_117_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incidental gall bladder cancer (IGBC) is often discovered unexpectedly in patients after cholecystectomy. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely applied in the pre-operative diagnosis of gall bladder diseases as laparoscopic cholecystectomy developed into the preferred method.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the pre-operative MRI application and laparoscopic management in the IGBCs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and January 2020, a total of 7917 patients with gall bladder diseases treated by laparoscopy were enrolled in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 49 patients diagnosed with IGBCs, the incidence of IGBCs in polypoid lesions, biliary pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholecystocholedocholithiasis and gall bladder stones was 0.42%, 1.19%, 0.62%, 1.20% and 0.49%, respectively. MRI evaluation showed more remarkable pre-operative imaging as compared to ultrasonographic evaluation (40.8 vs. 26.5, P < 0.05). Furthermore, 14 patients were diagnosed with gall bladder cancer through intraoperative histological examination and 11 received laparoscopic extensive resection after cholecystectomy. MRI findings with diffuse thickening of the gall bladder detected IGBCs with 6.1% sensitivity, 96.02 specificity, 0.95% positive predictive values and 99.4% negative predictive values; diffuse thickening of the gall bladder with suspicion of malignancy detected IGBCs with 12.2% sensitivity, 99.1% specificity, 7.6% positive predictive values and 99.5% negative predictive values; focal thickening of the gall bladder detected IGBCs with 16% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity, 32% positive predictive values and 99.5% negative predictive values; moreover, suspicious lesion detected IGBCs with 6.1% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 8.8% positive predictive values and 99.4% negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with biliary pancreatitis and cholecystocholedocholithiasis have a higher incidence of IGBC. MRI evaluation could provide more accurate information for the IGBCs, which should be recommended for patients accepting cholecystectomy. MRI findings exhibited an unsatisfactory sensitivity when detecting IGBCs, but they represented high specificity. Pre-operative MRI evaluation and intraoperative histological examination may help some IGBCs to achieve one-stage laparoscopic extensive resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"148-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_117_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incidental gall bladder cancer (IGBC) is often discovered unexpectedly in patients after cholecystectomy. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely applied in the pre-operative diagnosis of gall bladder diseases as laparoscopic cholecystectomy developed into the preferred method.

Aims and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the pre-operative MRI application and laparoscopic management in the IGBCs.

Materials and methods: Between January 2011 and January 2020, a total of 7917 patients with gall bladder diseases treated by laparoscopy were enrolled in this study.

Results: Amongst 49 patients diagnosed with IGBCs, the incidence of IGBCs in polypoid lesions, biliary pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholecystocholedocholithiasis and gall bladder stones was 0.42%, 1.19%, 0.62%, 1.20% and 0.49%, respectively. MRI evaluation showed more remarkable pre-operative imaging as compared to ultrasonographic evaluation (40.8 vs. 26.5, P < 0.05). Furthermore, 14 patients were diagnosed with gall bladder cancer through intraoperative histological examination and 11 received laparoscopic extensive resection after cholecystectomy. MRI findings with diffuse thickening of the gall bladder detected IGBCs with 6.1% sensitivity, 96.02 specificity, 0.95% positive predictive values and 99.4% negative predictive values; diffuse thickening of the gall bladder with suspicion of malignancy detected IGBCs with 12.2% sensitivity, 99.1% specificity, 7.6% positive predictive values and 99.5% negative predictive values; focal thickening of the gall bladder detected IGBCs with 16% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity, 32% positive predictive values and 99.5% negative predictive values; moreover, suspicious lesion detected IGBCs with 6.1% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 8.8% positive predictive values and 99.4% negative predictive values.

Conclusions: Patients with biliary pancreatitis and cholecystocholedocholithiasis have a higher incidence of IGBC. MRI evaluation could provide more accurate information for the IGBCs, which should be recommended for patients accepting cholecystectomy. MRI findings exhibited an unsatisfactory sensitivity when detecting IGBCs, but they represented high specificity. Pre-operative MRI evaluation and intraoperative histological examination may help some IGBCs to achieve one-stage laparoscopic extensive resection.

腹腔镜治疗和磁共振成像时代的误诊胆囊癌:单一机构的经验。
背景:胆囊切除术后的患者往往会意外发现偶发胆囊癌(IGBC)。目前,随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术发展成为首选方法,磁共振成像(MRI)已广泛应用于胆囊疾病的术前诊断:本研究旨在评估核磁共振成像在IGBC术前应用和腹腔镜治疗的情况:2011年1月至2020年1月期间,共有7917名胆囊疾病患者接受了腹腔镜治疗:在49例确诊为IGBCs的患者中,息肉样病变、胆源性胰腺炎、胆囊炎、胆囊胆管结石和胆囊结石的IGBCs发生率分别为0.42%、1.19%、0.62%、1.20%和0.49%。与超声评估相比,核磁共振成像评估显示的术前成像效果更显著(40.8 对 26.5,P < 0.05)。此外,14 名患者通过术中组织学检查确诊为胆囊癌,11 名患者在胆囊切除术后接受了腹腔镜广泛切除术。磁共振成像结果显示,胆囊弥漫性增厚检出 IGBC 的敏感性为 6.1%,特异性为 96.02%,阳性预测值为 0.95%,阴性预测值为 99.4%;胆囊弥漫性增厚疑似恶性肿瘤检出 IGBC 的敏感性为 12.2%,特异性为 99.1%,阳性预测值为 7.6%,阴性预测值为 99.此外,可疑病变检出 IGBC 的敏感性为 6.1%,特异性为 99.6%,阳性预测值为 8.8%,阴性预测值为 99.4%:结论:胆汁性胰腺炎和胆囊胆管结石患者的IGBC发病率较高。核磁共振成像评估可为 IGBC 提供更准确的信息,应推荐给接受胆囊切除术的患者。磁共振成像结果在检测 IGBC 方面的灵敏度并不理想,但特异性较高。术前磁共振成像评估和术中组织学检查可帮助一些IGBC实现腹腔镜一期广泛切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信