Comparing Medial Temporal Atrophy Between Early-Onset Semantic Dementia and Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Using Voxel-Based Morphometry: A Multicenter MRI Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ryota Kobayashi, Hiroshi Hayashi, Shinobu Kawakatsu, Yuzuru Shibuya, Daichi Morioka, Makoto Ohba, Masanori Yoshioka, Kazutaka Sakamoto, Masafumi Kanoto, Koichi Otani
{"title":"Comparing Medial Temporal Atrophy Between Early-Onset Semantic Dementia and Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Using Voxel-Based Morphometry: A Multicenter MRI Study.","authors":"Ryota Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hiroshi Hayashi,&nbsp;Shinobu Kawakatsu,&nbsp;Yuzuru Shibuya,&nbsp;Daichi Morioka,&nbsp;Makoto Ohba,&nbsp;Masanori Yoshioka,&nbsp;Kazutaka Sakamoto,&nbsp;Masafumi Kanoto,&nbsp;Koichi Otani","doi":"10.2174/1567205019666220820145429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-onset Semantic dementia (EOSD) and early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are often difficult to clinically differentiate in the early stages of the diseases because of the overlaps of clinical symptoms such as language symptoms. We compared the degree of atrophy in medial temporal structures between the two types of dementia using the voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer's disease (VSRAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants included 29 (age: 61.7±4.5 years) and 39 (age: 60.2±4.9 years) patients with EOSD and EOAD, respectively. The degree of atrophy in medial temporal structures was quantified using the VSRAD for magnetic resonance imaging data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to distinguish patients with EOSD and EOAD using the mean Z score (Z-score) in bilateral medial temporal structures and the absolute value (laterality score) of the laterality of Z-score (| right-left |) for indicating the degree of asymmetrical atrophy in medial temporal structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EOSD group had significantly higher Z and laterality scores than the EOAD group (Zscores: mean ± standard deviation: 3.74±1.05 vs. 1.56±0.81, respectively; P<0.001; laterality score: mean ± standard deviation: 2.35±1.23 vs. 0.68±0.51, respectively; P<0.001). In ROC analysis, the sensitivity and specificity to differentiate EOSD from EOAD by a Z-score of 2.29 were 97% and 85%, respectively and by the laterality score of 1.05 were 93% and 85%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOSD leads to more severe and asymmetrical atrophy in medial temporal structures than EOAD. The VSRAD may be useful to distinguish between these dementias that have several clinically similar symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10810,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":"19 7","pages":"503-510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205019666220820145429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Early-onset Semantic dementia (EOSD) and early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are often difficult to clinically differentiate in the early stages of the diseases because of the overlaps of clinical symptoms such as language symptoms. We compared the degree of atrophy in medial temporal structures between the two types of dementia using the voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer's disease (VSRAD).

Methods: The participants included 29 (age: 61.7±4.5 years) and 39 (age: 60.2±4.9 years) patients with EOSD and EOAD, respectively. The degree of atrophy in medial temporal structures was quantified using the VSRAD for magnetic resonance imaging data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to distinguish patients with EOSD and EOAD using the mean Z score (Z-score) in bilateral medial temporal structures and the absolute value (laterality score) of the laterality of Z-score (| right-left |) for indicating the degree of asymmetrical atrophy in medial temporal structures.

Results: The EOSD group had significantly higher Z and laterality scores than the EOAD group (Zscores: mean ± standard deviation: 3.74±1.05 vs. 1.56±0.81, respectively; P<0.001; laterality score: mean ± standard deviation: 2.35±1.23 vs. 0.68±0.51, respectively; P<0.001). In ROC analysis, the sensitivity and specificity to differentiate EOSD from EOAD by a Z-score of 2.29 were 97% and 85%, respectively and by the laterality score of 1.05 were 93% and 85%, respectively.

Conclusion: EOSD leads to more severe and asymmetrical atrophy in medial temporal structures than EOAD. The VSRAD may be useful to distinguish between these dementias that have several clinically similar symptoms.

使用基于体素的形态测量法比较早发性语义性痴呆和早发性阿尔茨海默病的内侧颞叶萎缩:一项多中心MRI研究
背景:早发性语义性痴呆(EOSD)与早发性阿尔茨海默病(EOAD)由于语言症状等临床症状的重叠,在疾病早期往往难以临床鉴别。我们使用基于体素的阿尔茨海默病特异性区域分析系统(VSRAD)比较了两种痴呆类型的内侧颞叶结构萎缩程度。方法:纳入29例(年龄:61.7±4.5岁)EOSD和39例(年龄:60.2±4.9岁)EOAD患者。使用VSRAD进行磁共振成像数据量化内侧颞叶结构的萎缩程度。采用受试者工作特征(Receiver operating characteristic, ROC)分析,以双侧内侧颞叶结构的平均Z分数(Z-score)和指示内侧颞叶结构不对称萎缩程度的Z-score(|右-左|)的偏侧性绝对值(偏侧性评分)来区分EOSD和EOAD患者。结果:EOSD组Z、侧度评分显著高于EOAD组(Z评分:平均值±标准差:3.74±1.05 vs 1.56±0.81;结论:EOSD导致内侧颞叶结构萎缩较EOAD更为严重且不对称。VSRAD可能有助于区分具有几种临床相似症状的痴呆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Alzheimer research
Current Alzheimer research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Alzheimer Research publishes peer-reviewed frontier review, research, drug clinical trial studies and letter articles on all areas of Alzheimer’s disease. This multidisciplinary journal will help in understanding the neurobiology, genetics, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies of Alzheimer’s disease. The journal publishes objective reviews written by experts and leaders actively engaged in research using cellular, molecular, and animal models. The journal also covers original articles on recent research in fast emerging areas of molecular diagnostics, brain imaging, drug development and discovery, and clinical aspects of Alzheimer’s disease. Manuscripts are encouraged that relate to the synergistic mechanism of Alzheimer''s disease with other dementia and neurodegenerative disorders. Book reviews, meeting reports and letters-to-the-editor are also published. The journal is essential reading for researchers, educators and physicians with interest in age-related dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research provides a comprehensive ''bird''s-eye view'' of the current state of Alzheimer''s research for neuroscientists, clinicians, health science planners, granting, caregivers and families of this devastating disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信