Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project.

Q3 Medicine
AANA journal Pub Date : 2023-02-01
Gaige P Flewelling, Bailey D Augustine, Jeffrey A Groom, Suzan Kardong-Edgren, Virginia C Simmons
{"title":"Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project.","authors":"Gaige P Flewelling,&nbsp;Bailey D Augustine,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Groom,&nbsp;Suzan Kardong-Edgren,&nbsp;Virginia C Simmons","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2016, the National Board of Certification and Recertification for Nurse Anesthetists (NBCRNA) launched a Continued Professional Certification (CPC) Program to promote lifelong learning and to facilitate ongoing professional competency checks for practicing certified registered nurse anesthesiologists (CRNA). The use of simulation-based assessment is currently being studied by the NBCRNA for potential use in the CPC Program. The aim of the pilot project was to create and validate simulation scenarios and assessment tools for potential incorporation into the CPC Program. Using the modified Delphi method, an expert panel of eight CRNAs evaluated the validity of four simulation scenarios and the content validity and reliability of four scenario-specific assessment tools. Each of the eight individual surveys assessing simulation scenario validity and assessment tool validity reached ≥ 75% agreement among the expert panelists. Overall content validity index values for the four assessment tools ranged from 0.960 to 0.993. There was a direct relationship between panelists' scores and level of performance on all returned assessment tools. The expert panel validated four simulation scenarios and four accompanying assessment tools. All scenarios and assessment tools were determined to have high content validity and reliability. Using these scenarios and assessment tools would provide unique advantages over standardized assessment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"91 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, the National Board of Certification and Recertification for Nurse Anesthetists (NBCRNA) launched a Continued Professional Certification (CPC) Program to promote lifelong learning and to facilitate ongoing professional competency checks for practicing certified registered nurse anesthesiologists (CRNA). The use of simulation-based assessment is currently being studied by the NBCRNA for potential use in the CPC Program. The aim of the pilot project was to create and validate simulation scenarios and assessment tools for potential incorporation into the CPC Program. Using the modified Delphi method, an expert panel of eight CRNAs evaluated the validity of four simulation scenarios and the content validity and reliability of four scenario-specific assessment tools. Each of the eight individual surveys assessing simulation scenario validity and assessment tool validity reached ≥ 75% agreement among the expert panelists. Overall content validity index values for the four assessment tools ranged from 0.960 to 0.993. There was a direct relationship between panelists' scores and level of performance on all returned assessment tools. The expert panel validated four simulation scenarios and four accompanying assessment tools. All scenarios and assessment tools were determined to have high content validity and reliability. Using these scenarios and assessment tools would provide unique advantages over standardized assessment methods.

一个模拟场景和评估工具的设计和验证:一个试点项目。
2016年,国家认证和再认证护士麻醉师委员会(NBCRNA)启动了持续专业认证(CPC)计划,以促进终身学习,并促进执业注册麻醉师(CRNA)的持续专业能力检查。NBCRNA目前正在研究基于模拟的评估方法在CPC计划中的潜在应用。试点项目的目的是创建和验证模拟场景和评估工具,以便潜在地纳入CPC计划。采用改进的德尔菲法,由8个crna组成的专家组评估了4个模拟场景的效度以及4个场景特定评估工具的内容效度和信度。评估模拟情景效度和评估工具效度的8项单独调查中,每一项在专家小组成员中都达到了≥75%的一致性。四种评价工具的总体内容效度指标值范围为0.960 ~ 0.993。小组成员的分数与所有返回的评估工具的表现水平之间存在直接关系。专家小组验证了四种模拟情景和四种附带的评估工具。所有的场景和评估工具都被确定为具有高的内容效度和信度。使用这些情景和评估工具将比标准化评估方法提供独特的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信