Vacuum Therapy and Internal Drainage as the First-Line Endoscopic Treatment for Post-Bariatric Leaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Issaree Laopeamthong, Thanita Akethanin, Wisit Kasetsermwiriya, Suphakarn Techapongsatorn, Amarit Tansawet
{"title":"Vacuum Therapy and Internal Drainage as the First-Line Endoscopic Treatment for Post-Bariatric Leaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Issaree Laopeamthong,&nbsp;Thanita Akethanin,&nbsp;Wisit Kasetsermwiriya,&nbsp;Suphakarn Techapongsatorn,&nbsp;Amarit Tansawet","doi":"10.1159/000518946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several endoscopic methods can be employed to manage post-bariatric leaks. However, endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) and endoscopic internal drainage (EID) are relatively new methods, and studies regarding these methods are scarce. We performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of EVT and EID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched for eligible studies. The clinical success of leak closure was the primary outcome of interest. A proportional meta-analysis was performed for pooling the primary outcome using a fixed-effects model. A meta-analysis or descriptive analysis of other outcomes was performed based on the data availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 3 EVT and 10 EID studies (<i>n</i> = 279) were used for evidence synthesis. The leak closure rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of EVT and EID were 85.2% (75.1%-95.4%) and 91.6% (88.1%-95.2%), respectively. The corresponding mean treatment durations (95% CI) were 28 (2.4-53.6) and 78.4 (50.1-106.7) days, respectively. However, data about other outcomes were extremely limited; thus, a pooled analysis could not be performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both EVT and EID were effective when used as the first-line treatment for post-bariatric leaks. However, larger studies must be conducted to compare the efficacy of the 2 interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874239/pdf/vis-0038-0063.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Several endoscopic methods can be employed to manage post-bariatric leaks. However, endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) and endoscopic internal drainage (EID) are relatively new methods, and studies regarding these methods are scarce. We performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of EVT and EID.

Methods: Databases were searched for eligible studies. The clinical success of leak closure was the primary outcome of interest. A proportional meta-analysis was performed for pooling the primary outcome using a fixed-effects model. A meta-analysis or descriptive analysis of other outcomes was performed based on the data availability.

Results: Data from 3 EVT and 10 EID studies (n = 279) were used for evidence synthesis. The leak closure rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of EVT and EID were 85.2% (75.1%-95.4%) and 91.6% (88.1%-95.2%), respectively. The corresponding mean treatment durations (95% CI) were 28 (2.4-53.6) and 78.4 (50.1-106.7) days, respectively. However, data about other outcomes were extremely limited; thus, a pooled analysis could not be performed.

Conclusions: Both EVT and EID were effective when used as the first-line treatment for post-bariatric leaks. However, larger studies must be conducted to compare the efficacy of the 2 interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

真空治疗和内引流作为治疗肥胖后渗漏的一线内镜治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
介绍:几种内窥镜方法可用于管理减肥后泄漏。然而,腔内真空治疗(EVT)和内镜内引流(EID)是相对较新的治疗方法,相关研究较少。我们对文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估EVT和EID的疗效。方法:检索数据库中符合条件的研究。临床成功的堵漏是主要的结果感兴趣。采用固定效应模型对主要结果进行了比例荟萃分析。根据数据的可用性对其他结果进行meta分析或描述性分析。结果:3项EVT和10项EID研究(n = 279)的数据用于证据合成。EVT和EID的堵漏率(95%置信区间[CI])分别为85.2%(75.1% ~ 95.4%)和91.6%(88.1% ~ 95.2%)。相应的平均治疗时间(95% CI)分别为28(2.4-53.6)天和78.4(50.1-106.7)天。然而,关于其他结果的数据非常有限;因此,无法执行池化分析。结论:EVT和EID作为减肥后渗漏的一线治疗均有效。然而,必须进行更大规模的研究来比较这两种干预措施的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信