Collaborative Rooming: An Innovative Pilot Project to Overcome Primary Care Challenges.

Q3 Medicine
Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Gagandeep Singh, Jill G Lenhart, Richard A Helmers, Michele Renee Eberle, Heather Costley, Joel B Roberts, Robert S Kaplan
{"title":"Collaborative Rooming: An Innovative Pilot Project to Overcome Primary Care Challenges.","authors":"Gagandeep Singh,&nbsp;Jill G Lenhart,&nbsp;Richard A Helmers,&nbsp;Michele Renee Eberle,&nbsp;Heather Costley,&nbsp;Joel B Roberts,&nbsp;Robert S Kaplan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care physicians are overburdened with growing complexities and increasing expectations for primary care visits. To meet expectations, primary care physicians must multitask during visits and spend extra hours in the office for charting, billing, and documentation. This impacts the physician's quality of life and may affect the quality of patient care. Many of the administrative tasks performed by physicians could, alternatively, be performed by nonphysician staff, leading to the adoption of team-based collaborative models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mayo Clinic Health System piloted a team-based collaborative model in a small physician practice in Osseo, Wisconsin, where which staff could be trained quickly and efficiently. The model used medical assistants/licensed practical nurses (MA/LPN) to partner with primary care physicians during a patient visit. The LPN/MA, under physician supervision, ordered and monitored pending orders/labs, coordinated patient care, provided after-visit educational needs, and communicated other urgent messages to team members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months, a comparison of pre- and posttrial data showed improved staff and patient satisfaction, decreased physician administrative work, and no cost-effectiveness improvement. Screening of medical conditions in the elderly improved, but no change was noted with chronic disease metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed improved staff and patient satisfaction, decreased physician clerical burden, increased appointment slots, mixed clinical outcomes, and did not demonstrate cost-effectiveness. The authors recommend that similar models be conducted in large settings to see if these results are reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":"121 4","pages":"306-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary care physicians are overburdened with growing complexities and increasing expectations for primary care visits. To meet expectations, primary care physicians must multitask during visits and spend extra hours in the office for charting, billing, and documentation. This impacts the physician's quality of life and may affect the quality of patient care. Many of the administrative tasks performed by physicians could, alternatively, be performed by nonphysician staff, leading to the adoption of team-based collaborative models.

Methods: Mayo Clinic Health System piloted a team-based collaborative model in a small physician practice in Osseo, Wisconsin, where which staff could be trained quickly and efficiently. The model used medical assistants/licensed practical nurses (MA/LPN) to partner with primary care physicians during a patient visit. The LPN/MA, under physician supervision, ordered and monitored pending orders/labs, coordinated patient care, provided after-visit educational needs, and communicated other urgent messages to team members.

Results: After 6 months, a comparison of pre- and posttrial data showed improved staff and patient satisfaction, decreased physician administrative work, and no cost-effectiveness improvement. Screening of medical conditions in the elderly improved, but no change was noted with chronic disease metrics.

Conclusions: Data showed improved staff and patient satisfaction, decreased physician clerical burden, increased appointment slots, mixed clinical outcomes, and did not demonstrate cost-effectiveness. The authors recommend that similar models be conducted in large settings to see if these results are reproducible.

协作分房:克服初级保健挑战的创新试点项目。
背景:初级保健医生负担过重的复杂性和日益增长的期望初级保健访问。为了满足期望,初级保健医生必须在就诊期间多任务处理,并在办公室花费额外的时间来制作图表、账单和文档。这会影响医生的生活质量,并可能影响病人的护理质量。由医生执行的许多管理任务也可以由非医生人员执行,从而导致采用基于团队的协作模式。方法:Mayo Clinic Health System在威斯康辛州Osseo的一家小型医师诊所试行了一种基于团队的协作模式,该模式可以快速有效地培训员工。该模型使用医疗助理/执业护士(MA/LPN)在患者就诊期间与初级保健医生合作。LPN/MA在医生的监督下,订购和监测待处理的订单/实验室,协调患者护理,提供术后教育需求,并向团队成员传达其他紧急信息。结果:6个月后,比较试验前后的数据显示,工作人员和患者的满意度提高了,医生的行政工作减少了,但成本效益没有改善。老年人的医疗状况筛查有所改善,但慢性病指标没有变化。结论:数据显示提高了工作人员和患者的满意度,减少了医生文书负担,增加了预约时间,混合临床结果,并没有显示成本效益。作者建议在大型环境中进行类似的模型,看看这些结果是否可重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信