Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis Among Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1055/a-1994-7500
Chong Wang, Shuhua Lan, Panpan Xie, Ruifeng Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis Among Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chong Wang, Shuhua Lan, Panpan Xie, Ruifeng Yang","doi":"10.1055/a-1994-7500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major and potentially life-threatening complications following major orthopedic surgeries. Research evidence comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis specific to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been limited. Hence, this review was done to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban against enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after THA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a search in databases including Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until May 2021. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing THA were eligible for inclusion. Outcome parameters assessed were efficacy in terms of total VTE and all-cause mortality, major VTE, deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and safety in terms of major bleeding events, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, minor bleeding events, total bleeding events, drug-related adverse events, and wound infection. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model and reported a pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies, including 9057 participants, were analyzed. Amongst efficacy outcomes, VTE and all-cause mortality pooled an RR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99), major VTE pooled an RR of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.15-0.90), deep vein thrombosis pooled an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32-1.02), and symptomatic VTE pooled an RR of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.30-0.87). Amongst safety outcomes, major bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.80), total bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93-1.34), drug-related adverse event pooled an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.12), and wound infection pooled an RR of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.58-2.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rivaroxaban is a more efficacious drug in terms of VTE and all-cause mortality compared to enoxaparin following THA, and rivaroxaban was non-inferior in terms of safety profiles such as wound infection, bleeding, and drug-related adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1994-7500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major and potentially life-threatening complications following major orthopedic surgeries. Research evidence comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis specific to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been limited. Hence, this review was done to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban against enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after THA.

Materials and methods: We conducted a search in databases including Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until May 2021. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing THA were eligible for inclusion. Outcome parameters assessed were efficacy in terms of total VTE and all-cause mortality, major VTE, deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and safety in terms of major bleeding events, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, minor bleeding events, total bleeding events, drug-related adverse events, and wound infection. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model and reported a pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Eleven studies, including 9057 participants, were analyzed. Amongst efficacy outcomes, VTE and all-cause mortality pooled an RR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99), major VTE pooled an RR of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.15-0.90), deep vein thrombosis pooled an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32-1.02), and symptomatic VTE pooled an RR of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.30-0.87). Amongst safety outcomes, major bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.80), total bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93-1.34), drug-related adverse event pooled an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.12), and wound infection pooled an RR of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.58-2.14).

Conclusion: Rivaroxaban is a more efficacious drug in terms of VTE and all-cause mortality compared to enoxaparin following THA, and rivaroxaban was non-inferior in terms of safety profiles such as wound infection, bleeding, and drug-related adverse events.

全髋关节置换术患者使用利伐沙班和依诺肝素预防血栓形成的有效性和安全性:系统综述与元分析》。
背景:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是重大骨科手术后的主要并发症之一,有可能危及生命。比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素对全髋关节置换术(THA)血栓预防效果的研究证据非常有限。因此,本综述旨在比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素在全髋关节置换术后预防血栓形成的有效性和安全性:我们在 Medline、EMBASE、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库中进行了检索,检索时间从开始到 2021 年 5 月。直接比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素对接受 THA 患者血栓预防效果的随机对照试验符合纳入条件。评估的结果参数包括总 VTE 和全因死亡率、主要 VTE、深静脉血栓、无症状 VTE 的有效性,以及主要出血事件、临床相关的非主要出血事件、轻微出血事件、总出血事件、药物相关不良事件和伤口感染的安全性。我们采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,并报告了汇总风险比(RR)及 95% 置信区间(CI):结果:共分析了 11 项研究,包括 9057 名参与者。在疗效结果中,VTE和全因死亡率的总RR为0.58(95% CI:0.34-0.99),主要VTE的总RR为0.37(95% CI:0.15-0.90),深静脉血栓形成的总RR为0.57(95% CI:0.32-1.02),症状性VTE的总RR为0.51(95% CI:0.30-0.87)。在安全性结果中,大出血事件汇总RR为1.18(95% CI:0.77-1.80),总出血事件汇总RR为1.12(95% CI:0.93-1.34),药物相关不良事件汇总RR为0.99(95% CI:0.87-1.12),伤口感染汇总RR为1.11(95% CI:0.58-2.14):结论:与依诺肝素相比,利伐沙班对THA术后VTE和全因死亡率的疗效更好,而在伤口感染、出血和药物相关不良事件等安全性方面,利伐沙班并不劣于依诺肝素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信