Beta-Blockers for Primary Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiac Toxicity: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Armin Attar, Arman Karimi Behnagh, Mehrasa Hosseini, Foad Amanollahi, Paria Shafiekhani, Ali Kabir
{"title":"Beta-Blockers for Primary Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiac Toxicity: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Armin Attar,&nbsp;Arman Karimi Behnagh,&nbsp;Mehrasa Hosseini,&nbsp;Foad Amanollahi,&nbsp;Paria Shafiekhani,&nbsp;Ali Kabir","doi":"10.1155/2022/8367444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized complication of chemotherapy with Anthracyclines. However, results from trials evaluating beta-blockers for prevention are controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to find whether prophylactic administration of beta-blockers can help prevent Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed randomized trials and observational studies where a prophylactic intervention was compared with a control arm in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) receiving Anthracyclines. The primary outcome was EF reduction. The secondary outcome was the development of Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD), defined as a decrease in the LVEF of >10% to a value of <53%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 17 trials comprising 1291 patients (671 patients in the intervention arm and 620 in the control arm). Carvedilol was administered in eight studies, and others used bisoprolol, metoprolol, or nebivolol. Compared with baseline, LVEF reduced in both intervention and control groups after chemotherapy (MD = -1.93%, 95% CI: -2.94, -0.92, <i>p</i> = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 72.1% vs. MD = -4.78%, 95% CI: -6.51, -3.04, <i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91.6%, respectively). LVEF was less reduced among the beta-blocker receivers (MD = 3.44%, 95% CI: 1.41-5.46, <i>p</i> = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.0%). Among the eight studies reporting the incidence of CTRCD, 45 out of 370 participants in the intervention arm and 54 out of 341 in the control arm were reported to experience this complication (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.53,1.09; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 24.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.235).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with beta-blockers prevents dilatation of the left ventricle, development of diastolic dysfunction, and reduction of LVEF. However, these hemodynamic effects do not translate into a significant reduction in CTRCD incidence and prevention of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiac death.</p>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2022 ","pages":"8367444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9818032/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8367444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized complication of chemotherapy with Anthracyclines. However, results from trials evaluating beta-blockers for prevention are controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to find whether prophylactic administration of beta-blockers can help prevent Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity.

Methods: We assessed randomized trials and observational studies where a prophylactic intervention was compared with a control arm in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) receiving Anthracyclines. The primary outcome was EF reduction. The secondary outcome was the development of Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD), defined as a decrease in the LVEF of >10% to a value of <53%.

Results: We included 17 trials comprising 1291 patients (671 patients in the intervention arm and 620 in the control arm). Carvedilol was administered in eight studies, and others used bisoprolol, metoprolol, or nebivolol. Compared with baseline, LVEF reduced in both intervention and control groups after chemotherapy (MD = -1.93%, 95% CI: -2.94, -0.92, p = 0.001, I2 = 72.1% vs. MD = -4.78%, 95% CI: -6.51, -3.04, p = 0.001, I 2 = 91.6%, respectively). LVEF was less reduced among the beta-blocker receivers (MD = 3.44%, 95% CI: 1.41-5.46, p = 0.001, I2 = 94.0%). Among the eight studies reporting the incidence of CTRCD, 45 out of 370 participants in the intervention arm and 54 out of 341 in the control arm were reported to experience this complication (RR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.53,1.09; I 2 = 24.4%; p = 0.235).

Conclusion: Treatment with beta-blockers prevents dilatation of the left ventricle, development of diastolic dysfunction, and reduction of LVEF. However, these hemodynamic effects do not translate into a significant reduction in CTRCD incidence and prevention of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiac death.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

-受体阻滞剂用于一级预防蒽环类药物引起的心脏毒性:一项随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析。
目的:心脏毒性是蒽环类药物化疗的常见并发症。然而,评估-受体阻滞剂预防效果的试验结果存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定预防性使用β受体阻滞剂是否有助于预防蒽环类药物引起的心脏毒性。方法:我们评估了随机试验和观察性研究,在接受蒽环类药物治疗的左室射血分数(LVEF)正常的患者中,预防性干预与对照组进行了比较。主要结局是EF降低。次要终点是癌症治疗相关心功能障碍(CTRCD)的发展,定义为LVEF下降>10%至以下值。结果:我们纳入了17项试验,包括1291例患者(干预组671例,对照组620例)。在8项研究中使用卡维地洛,其他研究使用比索洛尔、美托洛尔或奈比洛尔。与基线相比,化疗后干预组和对照组的LVEF均降低(MD = -1.93%, 95% CI: -2.94, -0.92, p = 0.001, I2 = 72.1%, MD = -4.78%, 95% CI: -6.51, -3.04, p = 0.001, I2 = 91.6%)。受体阻滞剂受体组LVEF降低较少(MD = 3.44%, 95% CI: 1.41-5.46, p = 0.001, I2 = 94.0%)。在报告CTRCD发生率的8项研究中,干预组370名参与者中有45名出现了这种并发症,对照组341名参与者中有54名出现了这种并发症(RR = 0.76;95% ci: 0.53,1.09;i2 = 24.4%;P = 0.235)。结论:β受体阻滞剂治疗可防止左心室扩张、舒张功能障碍的发生和LVEF的降低。然而,这些血流动力学效应并不能转化为CTRCD发生率的显著降低和心力衰竭或心源性死亡住院的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Acute coronary syndrome Arrhythmias Atherosclerosis Basic cardiac electrophysiology Cardiac catheterization Cardiac remodeling Coagulation and thrombosis Diabetic cardiovascular disease Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF) Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Vascular biology Ventricular assist devices Molecular cardio-biology Myocardial regeneration Lipoprotein metabolism Radial artery access Percutaneous coronary intervention Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信