Predictors of early bleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Suprabhat Giri, Sridhar Sundaram, Vaneet Jearth, Sukanya Bhrugumalla
{"title":"Predictors of early bleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Suprabhat Giri,&nbsp;Sridhar Sundaram,&nbsp;Vaneet Jearth,&nbsp;Sukanya Bhrugumalla","doi":"10.5114/ceh.2022.123096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is important for emergency as well as prophylactic management of esophageal varices. Early bleeding after EVL is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Assessing the likelihood of early post-EVL bleeding and its determinants can help deciding therapeutic strategies for high-risk patients. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify predictors of early bleeding after EVL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from 2000 to November 2021 for studies evaluating the incidence, predictors and outcome of post-EVL bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (OR), mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for prognostic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies with data on 13,378 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among 34 parameters, 14 parameters were assessed for association with early bleeding after EVL. Lower hemoglobin at admission (MD = 1.11, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.31), higher MELD score (MD = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.51-3.50), associated gastric varices (OR = 5.99, 95% CI: 1.06-33.90), higher number of bands (MD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.02-0.97), and peptic esophagitis (OR = 11.38, 95% CI: 1.21-106.81) were significantly associated with increased risk of bleeding. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the studies with respect to all the analyzed parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major predictors for early post-EVL bleeding in cirrhosis are admission hemoglobin level and MELD score, associated gastric varices, number of bands deployed during EVL, and peptic esophagitis on follow-up endoscopy. These risk factors may be useful for risk stratification after EVL in cirrhotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10281,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"8 4","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/63/CEH-8-49349.PMC9850299.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2022.123096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim of the study: Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is important for emergency as well as prophylactic management of esophageal varices. Early bleeding after EVL is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Assessing the likelihood of early post-EVL bleeding and its determinants can help deciding therapeutic strategies for high-risk patients. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to identify predictors of early bleeding after EVL.

Material and methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from 2000 to November 2021 for studies evaluating the incidence, predictors and outcome of post-EVL bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (OR), mean difference (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for prognostic variables.

Results: A total of 16 studies with data on 13,378 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among 34 parameters, 14 parameters were assessed for association with early bleeding after EVL. Lower hemoglobin at admission (MD = 1.11, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.31), higher MELD score (MD = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.51-3.50), associated gastric varices (OR = 5.99, 95% CI: 1.06-33.90), higher number of bands (MD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.02-0.97), and peptic esophagitis (OR = 11.38, 95% CI: 1.21-106.81) were significantly associated with increased risk of bleeding. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the studies with respect to all the analyzed parameters.

Conclusions: Major predictors for early post-EVL bleeding in cirrhosis are admission hemoglobin level and MELD score, associated gastric varices, number of bands deployed during EVL, and peptic esophagitis on follow-up endoscopy. These risk factors may be useful for risk stratification after EVL in cirrhotics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术后早期出血的预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的:内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)对食管静脉曲张的急诊和预防性治疗非常重要。EVL后早期出血与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。评估evl后早期出血的可能性及其决定因素可以帮助确定高危患者的治疗策略。本荟萃分析的目的是确定EVL后早期出血的预测因素。材料和方法:对2000年至2021年11月期间的文献进行了全面检索,以评估evl后出血的发生率、预测因素和结局。计算预后变量的合并优势比(OR)、平均差(MD)及其95%置信区间(CI)。结果:meta分析共纳入16项研究,涉及13378例患者。在34个参数中,评估了14个参数与EVL术后早期出血的相关性。入院时较低的血红蛋白(MD = 1.11, 95% CI: -1.91至-0.31)、较高的MELD评分(MD = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.51-3.50)、相关胃静脉曲张(OR = 5.99, 95% CI: 1.06-33.90)、较高的束数(MD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.02-0.97)和消化性食管炎(OR = 11.38, 95% CI: 1.21-106.81)与出血风险增加显著相关。然而,就所有分析参数而言,研究之间存在显著的异质性。结论:肝硬化EVL后早期出血的主要预测因素是入院时血红蛋白水平和MELD评分、相关胃静脉曲张、EVL期间展开的束带数量以及随访内镜下的消化性食管炎。这些危险因素可能有助于肝硬化EVL后的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hepatology – quarterly of the Polish Association for Study of Liver – is a scientific and educational, peer-reviewed journal publishing original and review papers describing clinical and basic investigations in the field of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信