Can youtube be trusted as a source of quality and reliable information on COVID-19 vaccination in Italy?

Q2 Medicine
Leandro Gentile, Paola Bertuccio, Angela Ancona, Andrea Cucchi, Giulia Dallagiacoma, Martino Alberto Godoy, Carlo Signorelli, Anna Odone
{"title":"Can youtube be trusted as a source of quality and reliable information on COVID-19 vaccination in Italy?","authors":"Leandro Gentile,&nbsp;Paola Bertuccio,&nbsp;Angela Ancona,&nbsp;Andrea Cucchi,&nbsp;Giulia Dallagiacoma,&nbsp;Martino Alberto Godoy,&nbsp;Carlo Signorelli,&nbsp;Anna Odone","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and aim: Social media platforms are common sources of information, even more so during the COVID-19 pandemic. YouTube is the second most popular social media platform both in Italy and globally. Following criticisms regarding quality control during the pandemic, banners that would direct viewers to official health information sources were incorporated into Youtube videos related to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and information quality of YouTube videos related to COVID-19 vaccination in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On March 2022, six different search queries were used to retrieve COVID-19 vaccination-related videos, resulting in the identification of 329 videos, and their characteristics were described. Two validated instruments, namely HoNCode and DISCERN, were used to assess the reliability and quality of the videos' content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total number of videos, 72.0% were from non-medical or generalist channels. The most represented category was internet media (32.5%) while the less frequent was educational medical channel (7.0%). Videos from medical channels had higher reliability (p=0.002) and quality (p<0.001) than not medical channels, despite receiving fewer visualizations (p=0.004), likes (p=0.018) and comments (p<0.001). Media and news agencies sources consistently delivered lower quality content.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that public health professionals and institutions should consider investing in social media representation to fill the gap with non-medical sources in terms of popularity, to provide reliable and interesting videos, and ultimately deliver health education to the general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Social media platforms are common sources of information, even more so during the COVID-19 pandemic. YouTube is the second most popular social media platform both in Italy and globally. Following criticisms regarding quality control during the pandemic, banners that would direct viewers to official health information sources were incorporated into Youtube videos related to COVID-19. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and information quality of YouTube videos related to COVID-19 vaccination in Italy.

Methods: On March 2022, six different search queries were used to retrieve COVID-19 vaccination-related videos, resulting in the identification of 329 videos, and their characteristics were described. Two validated instruments, namely HoNCode and DISCERN, were used to assess the reliability and quality of the videos' content.

Results: Of the total number of videos, 72.0% were from non-medical or generalist channels. The most represented category was internet media (32.5%) while the less frequent was educational medical channel (7.0%). Videos from medical channels had higher reliability (p=0.002) and quality (p<0.001) than not medical channels, despite receiving fewer visualizations (p=0.004), likes (p=0.018) and comments (p<0.001). Media and news agencies sources consistently delivered lower quality content.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that public health professionals and institutions should consider investing in social media representation to fill the gap with non-medical sources in terms of popularity, to provide reliable and interesting videos, and ultimately deliver health education to the general public.

youtube是否可以被信任为意大利新冠肺炎疫苗接种的优质可靠信息来源?
背景和目的:社交媒体平台是常见的信息来源,在新冠肺炎大流行期间更是如此。YouTube是意大利和全球第二大最受欢迎的社交媒体平台。在对疫情期间的质量控制提出批评后,将观众引导到官方健康信息来源的横幅被纳入了与新冠肺炎相关的Youtube视频中。本研究旨在评估意大利新冠肺炎疫苗接种相关YouTube视频的可靠性和信息质量。方法:2022年3月,使用六个不同的搜索查询检索新冠肺炎疫苗接种相关视频,共识别329个视频,并描述其特征。两个经过验证的工具,即HoNCode和DISCERN,被用来评估视频内容的可靠性和质量。结果:在视频总数中,72.0%来自非医学或多面手渠道。最具代表性的类别是互联网媒体(32.5%),而频率较低的是教育医疗频道(7.0%)。来自医疗频道的视频具有更高的可靠性(p=0.002)和质量(结论:这些发现表明,公共卫生专业人员和机构应该考虑投资于社交媒体代表性,以填补非医疗来源在受欢迎程度方面的差距,提供可靠和有趣的视频,并最终向公众提供健康教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信