Revisiting the concept of drug-resistant epilepsy: A TASK1 report of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1111/epi.17751
Stéphane Auvin, Aristea S. Galanopoulou, Solomon L. Moshé, Heidrun Potschka, Luisa Rocha, Matthew C. Walker, the TASK1 workgroup on drug-resistant epilepsy of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force
{"title":"Revisiting the concept of drug-resistant epilepsy: A TASK1 report of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force","authors":"Stéphane Auvin,&nbsp;Aristea S. Galanopoulou,&nbsp;Solomon L. Moshé,&nbsp;Heidrun Potschka,&nbsp;Luisa Rocha,&nbsp;Matthew C. Walker,&nbsp;the TASK1 workgroup on drug-resistant epilepsy of the ILAE/AES Joint Translational Task Force","doi":"10.1111/epi.17751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite progress in the development of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), one third of people with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The working definition of DRE, proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2010, helped identify individuals who might benefit from presurgical evaluation early on. As the incidence of DRE remains high, the TASK1 workgroup on DRE of the ILAE/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Joint Translational Task Force discussed the heterogeneity and complexity of its presentation and mechanisms, the confounders in drawing mechanistic insights when testing treatment responses, and barriers in modeling DRE across the lifespan and translating across species. We propose that it is necessary to revisit the current definition of DRE, in order to transform the preclinical and clinical research of mechanisms and biomarkers, to identify novel, effective, precise, pharmacologic treatments, allowing for earlier recognition of drug resistance and individualized therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"64 11","pages":"2891-2908"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.17751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite progress in the development of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), one third of people with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The working definition of DRE, proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2010, helped identify individuals who might benefit from presurgical evaluation early on. As the incidence of DRE remains high, the TASK1 workgroup on DRE of the ILAE/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Joint Translational Task Force discussed the heterogeneity and complexity of its presentation and mechanisms, the confounders in drawing mechanistic insights when testing treatment responses, and barriers in modeling DRE across the lifespan and translating across species. We propose that it is necessary to revisit the current definition of DRE, in order to transform the preclinical and clinical research of mechanisms and biomarkers, to identify novel, effective, precise, pharmacologic treatments, allowing for earlier recognition of drug resistance and individualized therapies.

重新审视耐药癫痫的概念:ILAE/AES联合转化工作组的TASK1报告。
尽管抗癫痫药物(ASM)的开发取得了进展,但三分之一的癫痫患者患有耐药性癫痫(DRE)。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)于2010年提出了DRE的工作定义,这有助于确定早期可能从术前评估中受益的个体。由于DRE的发病率仍然很高,ILAE/美国癫痫学会(AES)联合翻译工作组的任务1 DRE工作组讨论了其表现形式和机制的异质性和复杂性,在测试治疗反应时得出机制见解的混杂因素,以及在整个生命周期建模DRE和跨物种翻译中的障碍。我们建议有必要重新审视DRE的当前定义,以改变机制和生物标志物的临床前和临床研究,确定新的、有效的、精确的药理学治疗方法,从而更早地识别耐药性和个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信