Thoracic Paravertebral Block Decreased Body Temperature in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yanhong Yan, Jiao Geng, Xu Cui, Guiyu Lei, Lili Wu, Guyan Wang
{"title":"Thoracic Paravertebral Block Decreased Body Temperature in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yanhong Yan,&nbsp;Jiao Geng,&nbsp;Xu Cui,&nbsp;Guiyu Lei,&nbsp;Lili Wu,&nbsp;Guyan Wang","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S392961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) may be highly beneficial for thoracoscopic lobectomy patients, but it may increase the risk of hypothermia. Apart from its anesthetic-reducing effects, this randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the hypothermic effect of TPVB, and thus optimize its clinical use.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adult patients were randomly allocated to two groups: TPVB + general anesthesia (GA) group or GA group. In the TPVB+GA group, the block was performed after GA induction by an experienced but unrelated anesthesiologist. Both the lower esophageal and axillary temperature were recorded at the beginning of surgery (T<sub>0</sub>) and every 15 min thereafter (T<sub>1</sub>-T<sub>8</sub>), and the end of surgery (T<sub>p</sub>). The primary outcome was the lower esophageal temperature at T<sub>p</sub>. The secondary outcomes included lower esophageal temperature from T<sub>0</sub>-T<sub>8</sub> and axillary temperature from T<sub>0</sub>-T<sub>p</sub>. The total propofol, analgesics, and norepinephrine consumption and the incidence of adverse events were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the TPVB+GA (n=24) and GA (n=24) groups. The core temperature at the end of the surgery was lower in the TPVB+GA group than the GA group (35.90±0.30°C vs 36.35±0.33°C, P<0.001), with a significant difference from 45 min after the surgery began until the end of the surgery (P<0.05). In contrast, the peripheral temperature showed a significant difference at 60 min after the surgery began till the end (P<0.05). TPVB+GA exhibited excellent analgesic and sedative-sparing effects compared to GA alone (P<0.001), though it increased norepinephrine consumption due to hypotension (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although thorough warming strategies were used, TPVB combined with GA remarkably reduced the body temperature, which is an easily neglected side effect. Further studies on the most effective precautions are needed to optimize the clinical use of TPVB.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2e/a1/tcrm-19-67.PMC9880011.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S392961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) may be highly beneficial for thoracoscopic lobectomy patients, but it may increase the risk of hypothermia. Apart from its anesthetic-reducing effects, this randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the hypothermic effect of TPVB, and thus optimize its clinical use.

Patients and methods: Adult patients were randomly allocated to two groups: TPVB + general anesthesia (GA) group or GA group. In the TPVB+GA group, the block was performed after GA induction by an experienced but unrelated anesthesiologist. Both the lower esophageal and axillary temperature were recorded at the beginning of surgery (T0) and every 15 min thereafter (T1-T8), and the end of surgery (Tp). The primary outcome was the lower esophageal temperature at Tp. The secondary outcomes included lower esophageal temperature from T0-T8 and axillary temperature from T0-Tp. The total propofol, analgesics, and norepinephrine consumption and the incidence of adverse events were also recorded.

Results: Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the TPVB+GA (n=24) and GA (n=24) groups. The core temperature at the end of the surgery was lower in the TPVB+GA group than the GA group (35.90±0.30°C vs 36.35±0.33°C, P<0.001), with a significant difference from 45 min after the surgery began until the end of the surgery (P<0.05). In contrast, the peripheral temperature showed a significant difference at 60 min after the surgery began till the end (P<0.05). TPVB+GA exhibited excellent analgesic and sedative-sparing effects compared to GA alone (P<0.001), though it increased norepinephrine consumption due to hypotension (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Although thorough warming strategies were used, TPVB combined with GA remarkably reduced the body temperature, which is an easily neglected side effect. Further studies on the most effective precautions are needed to optimize the clinical use of TPVB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者椎旁阻滞降低体温:一项随机对照试验。
目的:胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)可能对胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者非常有益,但它可能增加低体温的风险。除了其镇痛作用外,本随机对照试验旨在研究TPVB的降体温作用,从而优化其临床应用。患者和方法:将成年患者随机分为TPVB +全身麻醉(GA)组和GA组。在TPVB+GA组中,在GA诱导后由经验丰富但无关的麻醉师进行阻滞。术前(T0)、术后每15 min (T1-T8)及手术结束(Tp)分别记录食管下段和腋窝温度。主要结局是Tp时食管温度降低。次要结果包括T0-T8期食管温度降低和T0-Tp期腋窝温度降低。同时记录丙泊酚、镇痛药和去甲肾上腺素的总用量及不良事件的发生率。结果:48例患者随机分为TPVB+GA组(n=24)和GA组(n=24)。TPVB+GA组手术结束时的核心温度低于GA组(35.90±0.30°C vs 36.35±0.33°C)。结论:虽然采用了彻底的升温策略,但TPVB联合GA明显降低了体温,这是一个容易被忽视的副作用。需要进一步研究最有效的预防措施,以优化TPVB的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信