Iterative Denoising Accelerated 3D FLAIR Sequence for Hydrops MR Imaging at 3T.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
American Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A7953
R Quint, A Vaussy, A Stemmer, C Hautefort, E Houdart, M Eliezer
{"title":"Iterative Denoising Accelerated 3D FLAIR Sequence for Hydrops MR Imaging at 3T.","authors":"R Quint, A Vaussy, A Stemmer, C Hautefort, E Houdart, M Eliezer","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A7953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>3D FLAIR sequences have become the criterion standard for identifying endolymphatic hydrops, but scan time remains an important limitation to their widespread use. Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of an accelerated 3D FLAIR sequence combined with an iterative denoising algorithm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study performed on 30 patients with clinical suspicion of endolymphatic hydrops who underwent 3T MR imaging 4 hours after gadolinium injection using two 3D FLAIR sequences. The first (conventional FLAIR) was accelerated with a conventional turbo factor of 187. The second was accelerated with an increased turbo factor of 263, resulting in a 33% scan time reduction (5 minutes 36 seconds versus 8 minutes 15 seconds, respectively). A sequence was reconstructed in-line immediately after the accelerated 3D FLAIR acquisition from the same raw data with iterative denoising (accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising). The signal intensity ratio image quality score and endolymphatic hydrops diagnosis were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean signal intensity ratio for symptomatic and asymptomatic ears of accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising was significantly higher than the mean SNR of conventional FLAIR (29.5 versus 19 and 25.9 versus 16.3, <i>P</i> < .001). Compared with the conventional FLAIR sequence, the image-quality score was higher with accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising (mean image-quality score, 3.8 [SD, 0.4] versus 3.3 [SD, 0.6] for accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising and conventional FLAIR, respectively, <i>P</i> = .003). There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops between the 2 sequences. Interreader agreement was good-to-excellent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The iterative denoising algorithm applied to an accelerated 3D FLAIR sequence for exploration of endolymphatic hydrops enabled significantly reducing the scan time without compromising image quality and diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7875,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"44 9","pages":"1064-1069"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: 3D FLAIR sequences have become the criterion standard for identifying endolymphatic hydrops, but scan time remains an important limitation to their widespread use. Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of an accelerated 3D FLAIR sequence combined with an iterative denoising algorithm.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study performed on 30 patients with clinical suspicion of endolymphatic hydrops who underwent 3T MR imaging 4 hours after gadolinium injection using two 3D FLAIR sequences. The first (conventional FLAIR) was accelerated with a conventional turbo factor of 187. The second was accelerated with an increased turbo factor of 263, resulting in a 33% scan time reduction (5 minutes 36 seconds versus 8 minutes 15 seconds, respectively). A sequence was reconstructed in-line immediately after the accelerated 3D FLAIR acquisition from the same raw data with iterative denoising (accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising). The signal intensity ratio image quality score and endolymphatic hydrops diagnosis were evaluated.

Results: The mean signal intensity ratio for symptomatic and asymptomatic ears of accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising was significantly higher than the mean SNR of conventional FLAIR (29.5 versus 19 and 25.9 versus 16.3, P < .001). Compared with the conventional FLAIR sequence, the image-quality score was higher with accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising (mean image-quality score, 3.8 [SD, 0.4] versus 3.3 [SD, 0.6] for accelerated-FLAIR iterative denoising and conventional FLAIR, respectively, P = .003). There was no significant difference in the diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops between the 2 sequences. Interreader agreement was good-to-excellent.

Conclusions: The iterative denoising algorithm applied to an accelerated 3D FLAIR sequence for exploration of endolymphatic hydrops enabled significantly reducing the scan time without compromising image quality and diagnostic performance.

用于3T Hydrops MR成像的迭代去噪加速三维FLAIR序列。
背景和目的:三维FLAIR序列已成为识别内淋巴积水的标准,但扫描时间仍然是其广泛应用的重要限制。我们的目的是评估与迭代去噪算法相结合的加速三维FLAIR序列的诊断性能和图像质量。材料和方法:这是一项对30名临床怀疑内淋巴积水的患者进行的回顾性研究,这些患者在注射钆4小时后使用两个3D FLAIR序列进行了3T MR成像。第一个(常规FLAIR)以187的常规涡轮因子加速。第二次加速时涡轮系数增加了263,导致扫描时间减少了33%(分别为5分36秒和8分15秒)。在用迭代去噪(加速FLAIR迭代去噪)从相同的原始数据进行加速3D FLAIR采集后,立即在线重建序列。评估信号强度比图像质量评分和内淋巴积水的诊断。结果:加速FLAIR迭代去噪的有症状和无症状耳朵的平均信号强度比显著高于常规FLAIR的平均信噪比(29.5对19和25.9对16.3,P<.001)。与常规FLAIR序列相比,加速FLAIR迭代去噪的图像质量分数更高(平均图像质量分数分别为3.8[SD,0.4]和3.3[SD,0.6],加速FLAIR和常规FLAIR,P=0.003)。两个序列在诊断内淋巴积水方面没有显著差异。阅读器之间的一致性很好。结论:迭代去噪算法应用于加速的三维FLAIR序列,用于探测内淋巴积水,能够在不影响图像质量和诊断性能的情况下显著缩短扫描时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
506
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The mission of AJNR is to further knowledge in all aspects of neuroimaging, head and neck imaging, and spine imaging for neuroradiologists, radiologists, trainees, scientists, and associated professionals through print and/or electronic publication of quality peer-reviewed articles that lead to the highest standards in patient care, research, and education and to promote discussion of these and other issues through its electronic activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信