Structural protections in inter-creditor agreements for mezzanine loans

Andrew A. Lance
{"title":"Structural protections in inter-creditor agreements for mezzanine loans","authors":"Andrew A. Lance","doi":"10.1002/bref.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reviews a number of the important structural protections found in inter-creditor agreements, discusses the negotiated modifications to those protections which are common today and assesses whether the modifications reflect market-driven erosion of the structural protections. After reviewing the differences between market placements and asset types which can justify such modifications, and the legal rationale underlying many common variations, the author concludes that the variations typically found in inter-creditor agreements are the product of legitimate negotiation and justifiable differentiation, rather than the erosion of structural protections as a by-product of a highly competitive environment. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"4 1","pages":"21-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews a number of the important structural protections found in inter-creditor agreements, discusses the negotiated modifications to those protections which are common today and assesses whether the modifications reflect market-driven erosion of the structural protections. After reviewing the differences between market placements and asset types which can justify such modifications, and the legal rationale underlying many common variations, the author concludes that the variations typically found in inter-creditor agreements are the product of legitimate negotiation and justifiable differentiation, rather than the erosion of structural protections as a by-product of a highly competitive environment. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications

夹层贷款债权人间协议中的结构性保护
本文回顾了债权人间协议中发现的一些重要的结构性保护,讨论了今天常见的对这些保护的谈判修改,并评估了这些修改是否反映了市场驱动的结构性保护的侵蚀。在审查了市场配售和资产类型之间的差异,这些差异可以证明这种修改是合理的,以及许多常见变化背后的法律依据之后,作者得出结论,在债权人间协议中通常发现的变化是合法谈判和合理区分的产物,而不是作为高度竞争环境的副产品的结构性保护的侵蚀。版权所有©2004 Henry Stewart Publications
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信