Preabortion ultrasound - a patient perspective.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volodymyr Podolskyi, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Lena Marions, Rebecca Gomperts
{"title":"Preabortion ultrasound - a patient perspective.","authors":"Volodymyr Podolskyi,&nbsp;Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson,&nbsp;Lena Marions,&nbsp;Rebecca Gomperts","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2249158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore women's perception of the need for an ultrasound scan before medical abortion provided by telemedicine services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have analysed women's requests for medical abortion through the website www.womenonweb.org from the 1st of January 2019 to the 5th of October 2020. Before receiving abortion drugs for self-managed medical abortion, women received online counselling and were asked to complete an online survey on pre-abortion ultrasound scan and the reasons for having or not having one. The initial dataset included 62641 entries from 207 countries. Each entry corresponded to a person's request for medical abortion. Women reported only one or multiple reasons for not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59648 women requesting a medical abortion, 45653 (76,54%) did not have any pre-abortion ultrasound scan and specified a reason for that. The countries with the highest rates of women not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan were Thailand, Poland, Northern Ireland, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, Chile, Indonesia, Germany, and Brazil. The main reasons for not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan were being confident regarding pregnancy length; and thus, no need for a scan stated by 10910/34390 women (31.7%), lack of resources stated by 10589/34390 women (30.8%), and privacy issues stated by 6472/34390 women (18.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most women opting for medical abortion through telemedicine did not undergo a pre-abortion ultrasound scan. The main reason stated was that women did not find it necessary, lack of resources and privacy issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2249158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To explore women's perception of the need for an ultrasound scan before medical abortion provided by telemedicine services.

Methods: We have analysed women's requests for medical abortion through the website www.womenonweb.org from the 1st of January 2019 to the 5th of October 2020. Before receiving abortion drugs for self-managed medical abortion, women received online counselling and were asked to complete an online survey on pre-abortion ultrasound scan and the reasons for having or not having one. The initial dataset included 62641 entries from 207 countries. Each entry corresponded to a person's request for medical abortion. Women reported only one or multiple reasons for not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan.

Results: Among 59648 women requesting a medical abortion, 45653 (76,54%) did not have any pre-abortion ultrasound scan and specified a reason for that. The countries with the highest rates of women not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan were Thailand, Poland, Northern Ireland, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, Chile, Indonesia, Germany, and Brazil. The main reasons for not having a pre-abortion ultrasound scan were being confident regarding pregnancy length; and thus, no need for a scan stated by 10910/34390 women (31.7%), lack of resources stated by 10589/34390 women (30.8%), and privacy issues stated by 6472/34390 women (18.8%).

Conclusion: Most women opting for medical abortion through telemedicine did not undergo a pre-abortion ultrasound scan. The main reason stated was that women did not find it necessary, lack of resources and privacy issues.

预堕胎超声-从患者角度看。
目的:探讨女性对远程医疗服务提供的药物流产前超声扫描需求的看法。方法:我们通过网站www.womenonweb.org分析了2019年1月1日至2020年10月5日期间女性的药物流产请求。在接受堕胎药物进行自我管理的药物流产之前,女性接受了在线咨询,并被要求完成一项关于堕胎前超声扫描的在线调查,以及是否进行超声扫描的原因。最初的数据集包括来自207个国家的62641个条目。每个条目对应一个人的药物流产请求。女性只报告了一个或多个原因没有进行堕胎前超声波扫描。结果:在59648名要求药物流产的女性中,45653人(76.54%)没有进行任何流产前超声扫描,并说明了原因。没有进行堕胎前超声波扫描的女性比例最高的国家是泰国、波兰、北爱尔兰、墨西哥、韩国、日本、智利、印度尼西亚、德国和巴西。没有进行流产前超声扫描的主要原因是对妊娠期长短有信心;因此,10910/34390名妇女(31.7%)表示不需要扫描,10589/33490名妇女(30.8%)表示缺乏资源,6472/3490名妇女(18.8%)表示存在隐私问题。结论:大多数通过远程医疗选择药物流产的妇女没有进行堕胎前超声扫描。所述的主要原因是妇女认为没有必要、缺乏资源和隐私问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信