Reliability of Ellman Classification System in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears on Magnetic Resonance Views.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
G Ilyas, O Gokalp
{"title":"Reliability of Ellman Classification System in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears on Magnetic Resonance Views.","authors":"G Ilyas,&nbsp;O Gokalp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The current study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Ellman classification system in partialthickness rotator cuff tears through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans instead of arthroscopic views. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pre-operative MRI scans of 45 patients, with confirmed partial-thickness rotator cuff rupture in previous arthroscopic surgeries (performed by the senior author), were obtained from Picture Archiving and Communication Systems records. The observers (n=8) were asked to categorize MRI scans according to Ellman's classification of location and grade. There were four orthopedic surgeons less experienced in rotator cuff operations in the first group and four more experienced orthopedic surgeons in the second group. They were asked to re-evaluate the MRI scans six weeks later, without access to their previous answers. Reliability evaluation was performed within and among the groups. It was also evaluated if the surgeon's experience increased the reliability of the classification. Fleiss kappa coefficient was used for the inter-observer reliability and Cohen kappa coefficient for the intra-observer reliability, and post hoc analysis was performed. RESULTS When all observers were examined in the inter-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was moderate agreement in the first location evaluation (κ=0.414); however, there was fair agreement in all other evaluations in both groups (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively). When all observers were examined in the mean intra-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was substantial agreement in both evaluations (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively). DISCUSSION A classification system must be valid, reliable, and reproducible. It should establish a standard terminology for both surgeons and researchers. The correct identification of the tear configuration is crucial for selecting the correct repair technique. In our study, in which we evaluated the Ellman classification, which is frequently used in arthroscopic diagnosis, we investigated its intra-observer and inter-observer reliability on MRI scans. Although the mean intra-observer evaluation results were substantial agreement (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively), inter-observer evaluation results were fair agreement (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively) except for the first location evaluation (κ=0.414). CONCLUSIONS Although intra-observer reliability was satisfactory, the Ellman system used in the classification of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was not found to be useful by using only MRI views because of fair inter-observer reliability except for the first location evaluation, which was moderate agreement. Key words: partial, rotator cuff, tear, Ellman classification, reliability, validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"90 4","pages":"259-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The current study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Ellman classification system in partialthickness rotator cuff tears through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans instead of arthroscopic views. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pre-operative MRI scans of 45 patients, with confirmed partial-thickness rotator cuff rupture in previous arthroscopic surgeries (performed by the senior author), were obtained from Picture Archiving and Communication Systems records. The observers (n=8) were asked to categorize MRI scans according to Ellman's classification of location and grade. There were four orthopedic surgeons less experienced in rotator cuff operations in the first group and four more experienced orthopedic surgeons in the second group. They were asked to re-evaluate the MRI scans six weeks later, without access to their previous answers. Reliability evaluation was performed within and among the groups. It was also evaluated if the surgeon's experience increased the reliability of the classification. Fleiss kappa coefficient was used for the inter-observer reliability and Cohen kappa coefficient for the intra-observer reliability, and post hoc analysis was performed. RESULTS When all observers were examined in the inter-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was moderate agreement in the first location evaluation (κ=0.414); however, there was fair agreement in all other evaluations in both groups (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively). When all observers were examined in the mean intra-observer evaluation, it was seen that there was substantial agreement in both evaluations (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively). DISCUSSION A classification system must be valid, reliable, and reproducible. It should establish a standard terminology for both surgeons and researchers. The correct identification of the tear configuration is crucial for selecting the correct repair technique. In our study, in which we evaluated the Ellman classification, which is frequently used in arthroscopic diagnosis, we investigated its intra-observer and inter-observer reliability on MRI scans. Although the mean intra-observer evaluation results were substantial agreement (κ=0.795-0.721, respectively), inter-observer evaluation results were fair agreement (κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337, respectively) except for the first location evaluation (κ=0.414). CONCLUSIONS Although intra-observer reliability was satisfactory, the Ellman system used in the classification of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears was not found to be useful by using only MRI views because of fair inter-observer reliability except for the first location evaluation, which was moderate agreement. Key words: partial, rotator cuff, tear, Ellman classification, reliability, validity.

在磁共振视图上,Ellman分类系统在肩袖部分厚度撕裂中的可靠性。
本研究旨在通过磁共振成像(MRI)扫描而不是关节镜观察来研究Ellman分类系统在部分厚度肩袖撕裂中的内部和观察者之间的可靠性。材料和方法从图片存档和通信系统记录中获得45例患者的术前MRI扫描,这些患者在先前的关节镜手术中证实了部分厚度的肩袖破裂(由资深作者执行)。观察员(n=8)被要求根据Ellman的位置和等级分类对MRI扫描进行分类。第一组有4名对肩袖手术经验不足的骨科医生,第二组有4名经验丰富的骨科医生。六周后,他们被要求重新评估核磁共振成像扫描结果,但不能看到之前的答案。在组内和组间进行可靠性评估。还评估了外科医生的经验是否增加了分类的可靠性。观察者间信度采用Fleiss kappa系数,观察者内信度采用Cohen kappa系数,并进行事后分析。结果对所有观察者进行观察者间评价时,第一定位评价有中等程度的一致性(κ=0.414);然而,两组在所有其他评价中均有相当一致的结果(κ分别=0.339- 0.383-0.337)。当对所有观察者进行平均观察者内部评估时,可以看到两种评估都有实质性的一致(κ分别=0.795-0.721)。分类系统必须有效、可靠、可重复。它应该为外科医生和研究人员建立一个标准术语。正确识别撕裂形态对于选择正确的修复技术至关重要。在我们的研究中,我们评估了常用于关节镜诊断的Ellman分类,我们研究了其在MRI扫描中的观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。虽然平均观察者内评价结果基本一致(κ=0.795-0.721),但除了第一个位置评价(κ=0.414)外,观察者间评价结果基本一致(κ=0.339- 0.383-0.337)。结论:尽管观察者内信度令人满意,但由于除了第一位置评估外,观察者间信度公平,因此仅使用MRI视图,Ellman系统用于部分厚度肩袖撕裂的分类并不有用。关键词:局部,肩袖,撕裂,Ellman分类,信度,效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信