Mitigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory-based therapy.

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Fahrettin Covut, Kristen M Sanfilippo
{"title":"Mitigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory-based therapy.","authors":"Fahrettin Covut,&nbsp;Kristen M Sanfilippo","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2022000414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have up to a 20-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population, with most events occurring within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) is a strong risk factor for VTE in MM. In a meta-analysis of 2 large, randomized trials comparing anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis vs placebo in ambulatory patients with cancer at high risk of VTE based on a validated risk score, the risk of VTE decreased without increasing the risk of major bleeding. However, few patients with MM participated in these trials (1.1%). Initial guidance for risk-stratifying patients with MM resulted in persistent rates of VTE >10% and highlighted the need for improved VTE risk stratification in patients with MM. Three validated risk scores are now available to quantify risk of VTE in patients with MM: SAVED, IMPEDE VTE, and PRISM scores. Using best available data, thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in patients with MM assessed as high risk for VTE, especially newly diagnosed patients receiving IMiD-based combination therapies. However, prospective studies are needed to further validate available models and identify the optimal thromboprophylactic agent for each VTE risk category.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2022 1","pages":"363-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9820182/pdf/hem.2022000414.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2022000414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have up to a 20-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population, with most events occurring within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) is a strong risk factor for VTE in MM. In a meta-analysis of 2 large, randomized trials comparing anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis vs placebo in ambulatory patients with cancer at high risk of VTE based on a validated risk score, the risk of VTE decreased without increasing the risk of major bleeding. However, few patients with MM participated in these trials (1.1%). Initial guidance for risk-stratifying patients with MM resulted in persistent rates of VTE >10% and highlighted the need for improved VTE risk stratification in patients with MM. Three validated risk scores are now available to quantify risk of VTE in patients with MM: SAVED, IMPEDE VTE, and PRISM scores. Using best available data, thromboprophylaxis should be strongly considered in patients with MM assessed as high risk for VTE, especially newly diagnosed patients receiving IMiD-based combination therapies. However, prospective studies are needed to further validate available models and identify the optimal thromboprophylactic agent for each VTE risk category.

减轻接受免疫调节治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
与一般人群相比,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加了20倍,大多数事件发生在诊断后的前6个月内。免疫调节药物(IMiDs)治疗是MM静脉血栓栓塞的一个重要危险因素。在2项大型随机试验的荟萃分析中,基于有效的风险评分,比较静脉血栓栓塞高风险的癌症门诊患者抗凝血栓预防与安慰剂,静脉血栓栓塞风险降低,但未增加大出血风险。然而,很少有MM患者参加了这些试验(1.1%)。MM患者风险分层的初步指导导致VTE持续发生率>10%,并强调需要改善MM患者的VTE风险分层。目前有三个经过验证的风险评分可用于量化MM患者的VTE风险:SAVED、阻碍VTE和PRISM评分。根据现有的最佳数据,对于被评估为静脉血栓栓塞高风险的MM患者,特别是接受imid联合治疗的新诊断患者,应强烈考虑血栓预防。然而,需要前瞻性研究来进一步验证可用的模型,并为每个静脉血栓栓塞风险类别确定最佳的血栓预防药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信