The social lives of isolates (and small language families): the case of the Northwest Amazon.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Interface Focus Pub Date : 2022-12-09 eCollection Date: 2023-02-06 DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2022.0054
Rik Van Gijn, Sietze Norder, Leonardo Arias, Nicholas Q Emlen, Matheus C B C Azevedo, Allison Caine, Saskia Dunn, Austin Howard, Nora Julmi, Olga Krasnoukhova, Mark Stoneking, Jurriaan Wiegertjes
{"title":"The social lives of isolates (and small language families): the case of the Northwest Amazon.","authors":"Rik Van Gijn, Sietze Norder, Leonardo Arias, Nicholas Q Emlen, Matheus C B C Azevedo, Allison Caine, Saskia Dunn, Austin Howard, Nora Julmi, Olga Krasnoukhova, Mark Stoneking, Jurriaan Wiegertjes","doi":"10.1098/rsfs.2022.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Americas are home to patches of extraordinary linguistic (genealogical) diversity. These high-diversity areas are particularly unexpected given the recent population of the Americas. In this paper, we zoom in on one such area, the Northwest Amazon, and address the question of how the diversity in this area has persisted to the present. We contrast two hypotheses that claim opposite mechanisms for the maintenance of diversity: the isolation hypothesis suggests that isolation facilitates the preservation of diversity, while the integration hypothesis proposes that conscious identity preservation in combination with contact drives diversity maintenance. We test predictions for both hypotheses across four disciplines: biogeography, cultural anthropology, population genetics and linguistics. Our results show signs of both isolation and integration, but they mainly suggest considerable diversity in how groups of speakers have interacted with their surroundings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13795,"journal":{"name":"Interface Focus","volume":"13 1","pages":"20220054"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interface Focus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2022.0054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Americas are home to patches of extraordinary linguistic (genealogical) diversity. These high-diversity areas are particularly unexpected given the recent population of the Americas. In this paper, we zoom in on one such area, the Northwest Amazon, and address the question of how the diversity in this area has persisted to the present. We contrast two hypotheses that claim opposite mechanisms for the maintenance of diversity: the isolation hypothesis suggests that isolation facilitates the preservation of diversity, while the integration hypothesis proposes that conscious identity preservation in combination with contact drives diversity maintenance. We test predictions for both hypotheses across four disciplines: biogeography, cultural anthropology, population genetics and linguistics. Our results show signs of both isolation and integration, but they mainly suggest considerable diversity in how groups of speakers have interacted with their surroundings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与世隔绝者(和小语种家庭)的社会生活:西北亚马逊案例。
美洲有许多语言(谱系)异常多样的地区。考虑到美洲的新近人口,这些高多样性地区尤其出人意料。在本文中,我们将聚焦于这样一个地区--亚马逊西北部,并探讨该地区的语言多样性是如何延续至今的。我们对比了两种假说,它们声称多样性的维持机制截然相反:隔离假说认为隔离有利于多样性的维持,而融合假说则认为有意识的身份保护与接触相结合推动了多样性的维持。我们在生物地理学、文化人类学、种群遗传学和语言学四个学科中对这两种假说的预测进行了检验。我们的研究结果显示了隔离和融合的迹象,但它们主要表明,在说话群体如何与周围环境互动方面存在着相当大的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interface Focus
Interface Focus BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each Interface Focus themed issue is devoted to a particular subject at the interface of the physical and life sciences. Formed of high-quality articles, they aim to facilitate cross-disciplinary research across this traditional divide by acting as a forum accessible to all. Topics may be newly emerging areas of research or dynamic aspects of more established fields. Organisers of each Interface Focus are strongly encouraged to contextualise the journal within their chosen subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信