Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-09-05 Print Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220167
Imaan Bayoumi, Richard H Glazier, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Kamila Premji, Tara Kiran, Eliot Frymire, Shahriar Khan, Michael E Green
{"title":"Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis.","authors":"Imaan Bayoumi, Richard H Glazier, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Kamila Premji, Tara Kiran, Eliot Frymire, Shahriar Khan, Michael E Green","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attachment to a regular primary care provider is associated with better health outcomes, but 15% of people in Canada lack a consistent source of ongoing primary care. We sought to evaluate trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario in 2008-2018, through an equity lens and in relation to policy changes in implementation of payment reforms and team-based care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using linked, population-level administrative data, we conducted a retrospective observational study to calculate rates of patients attached to a regular primary care provider from Apr. 1, 2008, to Mar. 31, 2019. We evaluated the association of patient characteristics and attachment in 2018 using sex-stratified, adjusted, multivariable logistic regression models and used segmented piecewise regression to evaluate changing trends before and after implementation of a policy that restricted physician entry to alternate models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attachment increased from 80.5% (<i>n</i> = 10 352 385) in 2008 to 88.9% of the population (<i>n</i> = 12 537 172) in 2018, but was lower among people with low comorbidity, high residential instability, material deprivation, rural residence and recent immigrants. Inequities narrowed for recent immigrants, males and people with lower incomes over the study period, but disparities persisted for these groups. Attachment grew by 1.47% annually until 2014 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), but was stagnant thereafter (annual percent change of 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Lack of sustained progress in attachment followed reduced levels of physician entry to alternate funding models. Although disparities narrowed for many groups over the study period, persistent gaps remained for immigrants and people with lower incomes; targeted interventions and policy changes are needed to address these persistent gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 5","pages":"E809-E819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/63/cmajo.20220167.PMC10482493.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attachment to a regular primary care provider is associated with better health outcomes, but 15% of people in Canada lack a consistent source of ongoing primary care. We sought to evaluate trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario in 2008-2018, through an equity lens and in relation to policy changes in implementation of payment reforms and team-based care.

Methods: Using linked, population-level administrative data, we conducted a retrospective observational study to calculate rates of patients attached to a regular primary care provider from Apr. 1, 2008, to Mar. 31, 2019. We evaluated the association of patient characteristics and attachment in 2018 using sex-stratified, adjusted, multivariable logistic regression models and used segmented piecewise regression to evaluate changing trends before and after implementation of a policy that restricted physician entry to alternate models.

Results: Attachment increased from 80.5% (n = 10 352 385) in 2008 to 88.9% of the population (n = 12 537 172) in 2018, but was lower among people with low comorbidity, high residential instability, material deprivation, rural residence and recent immigrants. Inequities narrowed for recent immigrants, males and people with lower incomes over the study period, but disparities persisted for these groups. Attachment grew by 1.47% annually until 2014 (p < 0.0001), but was stagnant thereafter (annual percent change of 0.13, p = 0.16).

Interpretation: Lack of sustained progress in attachment followed reduced levels of physician entry to alternate funding models. Although disparities narrowed for many groups over the study period, persistent gaps remained for immigrants and people with lower incomes; targeted interventions and policy changes are needed to address these persistent gaps.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2008-2018 年安大略省初级医疗服务提供者的依附趋势:间断时间序列分析。
背景:对固定的初级保健提供者的依恋与更好的健康结果有关,但加拿大有 15%的人缺乏持续的初级保健来源。我们试图从公平的角度,并结合实施支付改革和团队医疗的政策变化,评估 2008-2018 年安大略省初级医疗服务提供者的依附趋势:我们使用关联的人口级行政数据,开展了一项回顾性观察研究,以计算2008年4月1日至2019年3月31日期间依附于固定初级医疗服务提供者的患者比例。我们使用性别分层、调整、多变量逻辑回归模型评估了 2018 年患者特征与依附关系,并使用分段片断回归评估了限制医生进入替代模式的政策实施前后的变化趋势:就医率从2008年的80.5%(n=10 352 385)上升到2018年的88.9%(n=12 537 172),但在合并症低、居住不稳定性高、物质匮乏、农村居民和新移民中就医率较低。在研究期间,新移民、男性和收入较低人群的不平等有所缩小,但这些群体的差距依然存在。在 2014 年之前,依恋程度每年增长 1.47%(p < 0.0001),但之后就停滞不前了(年百分比变化为 0.13,p = 0.16):解释:在医生进入其他资助模式的水平降低后,依附关系缺乏持续进展。尽管在研究期间许多群体的差距有所缩小,但移民和低收入人群的差距依然存在;需要采取有针对性的干预措施和政策变革来解决这些持续存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信