Domains of Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Function: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, 1999/2000 to 2006/2007.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Laura Major, Eleanor M Simonsick, Melissa A Napolitano, Loretta DiPietro
{"title":"Domains of Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Function: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study, 1999/2000 to 2006/2007.","authors":"Laura Major, Eleanor M Simonsick, Melissa A Napolitano, Loretta DiPietro","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the relationship between various domains of sedentary behavior and subsequent cognitive function to evaluate whether different sedentary activities have specific associations with future cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from 1 261 older adults participating in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study between 1999/2000 and 2006/2007. Total sitting time (hours/day), reading time (hours/week), and TV time (≤27/≥28 h/wk) were self-reported at baseline and 3 years later. At follow-up, cognitive function was evaluated using the Teng Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Multivariable linear regression modeling examined the independent associations of baseline sedentary behaviors and 3-year change in those behaviors with cognitive function scores at follow-up, adjusting for important covariables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline total sitting time was positively associated with 3MS (β = 0.14 ± 0.07; p < .05) and DSST (β = 0.20 ± 0.10; p < .05) scores at follow-up, as was reading time (β = 0.09 ± 0.03; p < .05 for 3MS score and β = 0.14 ± 0.04; p < 0.01 for DSST score). Participants who increased their TV watching time over 3 years had a significantly lower 3MS score (β = -1.45 ± 0.71; p < .05) at follow-up, compared with those who maintained a low level of TV time (referent). These findings were independent of age, sex, race, education level, health status, depressive symptoms, and physical activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some types of sedentary behavior may have benefits for cognitive function in older age, thus highlighting the importance of measuring different domains of sitting time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49953,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2035-2041"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examines the relationship between various domains of sedentary behavior and subsequent cognitive function to evaluate whether different sedentary activities have specific associations with future cognitive performance.

Methods: Data were from 1 261 older adults participating in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study between 1999/2000 and 2006/2007. Total sitting time (hours/day), reading time (hours/week), and TV time (≤27/≥28 h/wk) were self-reported at baseline and 3 years later. At follow-up, cognitive function was evaluated using the Teng Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Multivariable linear regression modeling examined the independent associations of baseline sedentary behaviors and 3-year change in those behaviors with cognitive function scores at follow-up, adjusting for important covariables.

Results: Baseline total sitting time was positively associated with 3MS (β = 0.14 ± 0.07; p < .05) and DSST (β = 0.20 ± 0.10; p < .05) scores at follow-up, as was reading time (β = 0.09 ± 0.03; p < .05 for 3MS score and β = 0.14 ± 0.04; p < 0.01 for DSST score). Participants who increased their TV watching time over 3 years had a significantly lower 3MS score (β = -1.45 ± 0.71; p < .05) at follow-up, compared with those who maintained a low level of TV time (referent). These findings were independent of age, sex, race, education level, health status, depressive symptoms, and physical activity.

Conclusion: Some types of sedentary behavior may have benefits for cognitive function in older age, thus highlighting the importance of measuring different domains of sitting time.

久坐行为和认知功能领域:健康、衰老和身体成分研究,1999/2000至2006/2007。
背景:本研究考察了久坐行为的各个领域与随后的认知功能之间的关系,以评估不同的久坐活动是否与未来的认知表现有特定的关联。方法:数据来自1999/2000年至2006/2007年间参与健康、衰老和身体成分(健康ABC)研究的1261名老年人。在基线和3年后自我报告总坐着时间(小时/天)、阅读时间(小时数/周)和电视时间(≤27/≥28小时/周)。在随访中,使用Teng迷你精神状态检查(3MS)和数字符号替代测试(DSST)评估认知功能。多变量线性回归模型检验了基线久坐行为和这些行为的3年变化与随访时认知功能得分的独立相关性,并对重要的协变量进行了调整。结果:基线总坐位时间与随访时的3MS(β=0.14±0.07;p<0.05)和DSST(β=0.20±0.10;p<.05)评分呈正相关,阅读时间(β=0.09±0.03;p<0.053MS评分和β=0.14士0.04;p<0.01 DSST评分)也是如此。与那些保持低电视时间水平的参与者相比,在3年内增加电视观看时间的参与者在随访时的3MS评分显著较低(β=-1.45±0.71;p<0.05)。这些发现与年龄、性别、种族、教育水平、健康状况、抑郁症状和体育活动无关。结论:某些类型的久坐行为可能对老年人的认知功能有益,从而突出了测量不同领域久坐时间的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes articles representing the full range of medical sciences pertaining to aging. Appropriate areas include, but are not limited to, basic medical science, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, and health services research for professions such as medicine, dentistry, allied health sciences, and nursing. It publishes articles on research pertinent to human biology and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信