Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery: application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation.

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
Philipp Stefan, Michael Pfandler, Aljoscha Kullmann, Ulrich Eck, Amelie Koch, Christoph Mehren, Anna von der Heide, Simon Weidert, Julian Fürmetz, Ekkehard Euler, Marc Lazarovici, Nassir Navab, Matthias Weigl
{"title":"Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery: application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation.","authors":"Philipp Stefan,&nbsp;Michael Pfandler,&nbsp;Aljoscha Kullmann,&nbsp;Ulrich Eck,&nbsp;Amelie Koch,&nbsp;Christoph Mehren,&nbsp;Anna von der Heide,&nbsp;Simon Weidert,&nbsp;Julian Fürmetz,&nbsp;Ekkehard Euler,&nbsp;Marc Lazarovici,&nbsp;Nassir Navab,&nbsp;Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is a key requirement of competency-based medical education in postgraduate surgical education. Although simulated workplace-based assessment (SWBA) has been proposed to complement WBA, it is insufficiently adopted in surgical education. In particular, approaches to criterion-referenced and automated assessment of intraoperative surgical competency in contextualized SWBA settings are missing.Main objectives were (1) application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance and exemplary adaptation to spine surgery (vertebroplasty); (2) development of computer-assisted assessment based on criterion-referenced metrics; and (3) implementation in contextualized, team-based operating room (OR) simulation, and evaluation of validity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multistage development and assessment study: (1) expert-based definition of performance indicators based on framework's performance domains; (2) development of respective assessment metrics based on preoperative planning and intraoperative performance data; (3) implementation in mixed-reality OR simulation and assessment of surgeons operating in a confederate team. Statistical analyses included internal consistency and interdomain associations, correlations with experience, and technical and non-technical performances.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Surgical simulation center. Full surgical team set-up within mixed-reality OR simulation.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eleven surgeons were recruited from two teaching hospitals. Eligibility criteria included surgical specialists in orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery with prior VP or kyphoplasty experience.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Computer-assisted assessment of surgeons' intraoperative performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance scores were associated with surgeons' experience, observational assessment (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) scores and overall pass/fail ratings. Results provide strong evidence for validity of our computer-assisted SWBA approach. Diverse indicators of surgeons' technical and non-technical performances could be quantified and captured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to investigate computer-assisted assessment based on a competency framework in authentic, contextualized team-based OR simulation. Our approach discriminates surgical competency across the domains of intraoperative performance. It advances previous automated assessment based on the use of current surgical simulators in decontextualized settings. Our findings inform future use of computer-assisted multidomain competency assessments of surgeons using SWBA approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/be/bmjsit-2022-000135.PMC9853221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is a key requirement of competency-based medical education in postgraduate surgical education. Although simulated workplace-based assessment (SWBA) has been proposed to complement WBA, it is insufficiently adopted in surgical education. In particular, approaches to criterion-referenced and automated assessment of intraoperative surgical competency in contextualized SWBA settings are missing.Main objectives were (1) application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance and exemplary adaptation to spine surgery (vertebroplasty); (2) development of computer-assisted assessment based on criterion-referenced metrics; and (3) implementation in contextualized, team-based operating room (OR) simulation, and evaluation of validity.

Design: Multistage development and assessment study: (1) expert-based definition of performance indicators based on framework's performance domains; (2) development of respective assessment metrics based on preoperative planning and intraoperative performance data; (3) implementation in mixed-reality OR simulation and assessment of surgeons operating in a confederate team. Statistical analyses included internal consistency and interdomain associations, correlations with experience, and technical and non-technical performances.

Setting: Surgical simulation center. Full surgical team set-up within mixed-reality OR simulation.

Participants: Eleven surgeons were recruited from two teaching hospitals. Eligibility criteria included surgical specialists in orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery with prior VP or kyphoplasty experience.

Main outcome measures: Computer-assisted assessment of surgeons' intraoperative performance.

Results: Performance scores were associated with surgeons' experience, observational assessment (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) scores and overall pass/fail ratings. Results provide strong evidence for validity of our computer-assisted SWBA approach. Diverse indicators of surgeons' technical and non-technical performances could be quantified and captured.

Conclusions: This study is the first to investigate computer-assisted assessment based on a competency framework in authentic, contextualized team-based OR simulation. Our approach discriminates surgical competency across the domains of intraoperative performance. It advances previous automated assessment based on the use of current surgical simulators in decontextualized settings. Our findings inform future use of computer-assisted multidomain competency assessments of surgeons using SWBA approaches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

计算机辅助的基于工作场所的手术评估:混合现实模拟中术中表现通用框架的应用
目的:基于工作场所的评估(WBA)是基于能力的医学教育在研究生外科教育中的关键要求。虽然基于工作场所的模拟评估(SWBA)已被提议作为WBA的补充,但它在外科教育中的应用还不够。特别是,在情境化的SWBA环境中,缺乏标准参考和自动评估术中手术能力的方法。主要目标是(1)应用术中表现的通用框架和脊柱手术(椎体成形术)的示范性适应;(2)开发基于标准参考度量的计算机辅助评估;(3)情境化、团队化手术室(OR)模拟的实施及有效性评估。设计:多阶段开发与评估研究:(1)基于框架绩效域的绩效指标专家定义;(2)根据术前计划和术中表现数据制定相应的评估指标;(3)在联盟团队中实施混合现实手术室模拟和评估外科医生。统计分析包括内部一致性和领域间的关联,与经验的相关性,以及技术和非技术性能。地点:手术模拟中心。在混合现实手术室模拟中建立完整的外科团队。参与者:从两所教学医院招募了11名外科医生。入选标准包括骨科、外伤或神经外科专家,既往有VP或后凸成形术经验。主要观察指标:计算机辅助评估外科医生术中表现。结果:表现评分与外科医生的经验、观察性评估(客观结构化技术技能评估)评分和总体合格/不合格评分相关。结果为我们的计算机辅助SWBA方法的有效性提供了强有力的证据。外科医生的技术和非技术表现的各种指标可以量化和捕获。结论:本研究首次在真实情境化团队手术室模拟中研究基于胜任力框架的计算机辅助评估。我们的方法区分手术能力跨越领域的术中表现。它推进了先前基于在非情境设置中使用当前手术模拟器的自动评估。我们的研究结果为未来使用SWBA方法对外科医生进行计算机辅助多领域能力评估提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信