Utility of the Modified Nutritional Risk in the Critically ill Score as an Outcome Predictor in All-Cause Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Febrile Illness-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-07 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_98_22
Pratibha Todur, Anitha Nileshwar, Souvik Chaudhuri, Sagar S Maddani, Shwethapriya Rao, S Thejesh
{"title":"Utility of the Modified Nutritional Risk in the Critically ill Score as an Outcome Predictor in All-Cause Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Febrile Illness-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Pratibha Todur,&nbsp;Anitha Nileshwar,&nbsp;Souvik Chaudhuri,&nbsp;Sagar S Maddani,&nbsp;Shwethapriya Rao,&nbsp;S Thejesh","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_98_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nutritional risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score is a predictor of adverse outcomes in the critically ill, and its utility in a specific population of critically ill has been recommended. We aimed to study the utility of modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) score as a mortality predictor in acute febrile illness (AFI)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and all-cause ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recorded data from two prospective observational ARDS studies conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital to evaluate the utility of the mNUTRIC score as an independent mortality predictor in all-cause ARDS and AFI-ARDS. A total of 216 all-cause ARDS patients were included, of which 73 were AFI-ARDS and 143 were non-AFI ARDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mortality of AFI-ARDS was 16/73 (21.9%) compared to 62/143 (43.35%) in non-AFI ARDS (<i>P</i> = 0.002). There were no significant differences in severity of ARDS in AFI-ARDS and non-AFI ARDS groups (<i>P</i> = 0.504). The mNUTRIC score was found to be an independent predictor of mortality in all-cause ARDS patients (<i>n</i> = 216) and AFI-ARDS patients (<i>n</i> = 73) after Cox regression multivariable analysis. In all-cause ARDS, the mNUTRIC score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.778, cutoff ≥4, 82.1% sensitivity, and 65.9% specificity as a predictor of mortality. In AFI-ARDS, the mNUTRIC score had an AUC of 0.769, cutoff ≥4, 81.3% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity, and <i>P</i> = 0.001 as a predictor of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The mNUTRIC score is an independent mortality predictor for all-cause ARDS and AFI-ARDS patients. AFI-ARDS has significantly lesser mortality than non-AFI ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838650/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_98_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Nutritional risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score is a predictor of adverse outcomes in the critically ill, and its utility in a specific population of critically ill has been recommended. We aimed to study the utility of modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) score as a mortality predictor in acute febrile illness (AFI)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and all-cause ARDS patients.

Methods: We recorded data from two prospective observational ARDS studies conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital to evaluate the utility of the mNUTRIC score as an independent mortality predictor in all-cause ARDS and AFI-ARDS. A total of 216 all-cause ARDS patients were included, of which 73 were AFI-ARDS and 143 were non-AFI ARDS.

Results: Mortality of AFI-ARDS was 16/73 (21.9%) compared to 62/143 (43.35%) in non-AFI ARDS (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in severity of ARDS in AFI-ARDS and non-AFI ARDS groups (P = 0.504). The mNUTRIC score was found to be an independent predictor of mortality in all-cause ARDS patients (n = 216) and AFI-ARDS patients (n = 73) after Cox regression multivariable analysis. In all-cause ARDS, the mNUTRIC score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.778, cutoff ≥4, 82.1% sensitivity, and 65.9% specificity as a predictor of mortality. In AFI-ARDS, the mNUTRIC score had an AUC of 0.769, cutoff ≥4, 81.3% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity, and P = 0.001 as a predictor of mortality.

Conclusion: The mNUTRIC score is an independent mortality predictor for all-cause ARDS and AFI-ARDS patients. AFI-ARDS has significantly lesser mortality than non-AFI ARDS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重症评分中改良营养风险作为全因急性呼吸窘迫综合征和急性发热性疾病引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合症的预后预测指标的效用。
引言:危重症患者的营养风险(NUTRIC)评分是危重症患者不良后果的预测指标,建议其在特定危重人群中使用。我们旨在研究改良NUTRIC(mNUTRIC)评分作为急性发热性疾病(AFI)诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和全因ARDS患者死亡率预测指标的效用。方法:我们记录了在一家单中心三级护理医院进行的两项前瞻性观察性ARDS研究的数据,以评估mNUTRIC评分作为全因ARDS和AFI-ARDS的独立死亡率预测指标的效用。共纳入216例全因ARDS患者,结果:AFI-ARDS的死亡率为16/73(21.9%),而非AFI-ARDS的死亡率为62/143(43.35%)(P=0.002)。AFI-ARDS-和非AFI-ARDS组的ARDS严重程度没有显著差异(P=0.504)(n=73)。在全因ARDS中,mNUTRIC评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.778,临界值≥4,敏感性为82.1%,特异性为65.9%,可作为死亡率的预测指标。在AFI-ARDS中,mNUTRIC评分的AUC为0.769,临界值≥4,敏感性为81.3%,特异性为66.67%,P=0.001作为死亡率的预测指标。结论:mNUTRIC评分是全因ARDS和AFI-ARDS患者死亡率的独立预测指标。AFI-ARDS的死亡率明显低于非AFI ARDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信