Medical, behavioural and social preconception and interconception risk factors among pregnancy planning and recently pregnant Canadian women.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Cindy-Lee Dennis, Alessandra Prioreschi, Hilary K Brown, Sarah Brennenstuhl, Rhonda C Bell, Stephanie Atkinson, Dragana Misita, Flavia Marini, Sarah Carsley, Nilusha Jiwani-Ebrahim, Catherine Birken
{"title":"Medical, behavioural and social preconception and interconception risk factors among pregnancy planning and recently pregnant Canadian women.","authors":"Cindy-Lee Dennis,&nbsp;Alessandra Prioreschi,&nbsp;Hilary K Brown,&nbsp;Sarah Brennenstuhl,&nbsp;Rhonda C Bell,&nbsp;Stephanie Atkinson,&nbsp;Dragana Misita,&nbsp;Flavia Marini,&nbsp;Sarah Carsley,&nbsp;Nilusha Jiwani-Ebrahim,&nbsp;Catherine Birken","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2021-001175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to describe the clustering of medical, behavioural and social preconception and interconception health risk factors and determine demographic factors associated with these risk clusters among Canadian women.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional data were collected via an online questionnaire assessing a range of preconception risk factors. Prevalence of each risk factor and the total number of risk factors present was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression models determined which demographic factors were associated with having greater than the mean number of risk factors. Exploratory factor analysis determined how risk factors clustered, and Spearman's r determined how demographic characteristics related to risk factors within each cluster.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were recruited via advertisements on public health websites, social media, parenting webpages and referrals from ongoing studies or existing research datasets. Women were eligible to participate if they could read and understand English, were able to access a telephone or the internet, and were either planning a first pregnancy (preconception) or had ≥1 child in the past 5 years and were thus in the interconception period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most women (n=1080) were 34 or older, and were in the interconception period (98%). Most reported risks in only one of the 12 possible risk factor categories (55%), but women reported on average 4 risks each. Common risks were a history of caesarean section (33.1%), miscarriage (27.2%) and high birth weight (13.5%). Just over 40% had fair or poor eating habits, and nearly half were not getting enough physical activity. Three-quarters had a body mass index indicating overweight or obesity. Those without a postsecondary degree (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.17) and single women (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.96) had over twice the odds of having more risk factors. Those with two children or more had 60% lower odds of having more risk factors (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86). Low education and being born outside Canada were correlated with the greatest number of risk clusters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many of the common risk factors were behavioural and thus preventable. Understanding which groups of women are prone to certain risk behaviours provides opportunities for researchers and policy-makers to target interventions more efficiently and effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/64/fmch-2021-001175.PMC9486295.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to describe the clustering of medical, behavioural and social preconception and interconception health risk factors and determine demographic factors associated with these risk clusters among Canadian women.

Design: Cross-sectional data were collected via an online questionnaire assessing a range of preconception risk factors. Prevalence of each risk factor and the total number of risk factors present was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression models determined which demographic factors were associated with having greater than the mean number of risk factors. Exploratory factor analysis determined how risk factors clustered, and Spearman's r determined how demographic characteristics related to risk factors within each cluster.

Setting: Canada.

Participants: Participants were recruited via advertisements on public health websites, social media, parenting webpages and referrals from ongoing studies or existing research datasets. Women were eligible to participate if they could read and understand English, were able to access a telephone or the internet, and were either planning a first pregnancy (preconception) or had ≥1 child in the past 5 years and were thus in the interconception period.

Results: Most women (n=1080) were 34 or older, and were in the interconception period (98%). Most reported risks in only one of the 12 possible risk factor categories (55%), but women reported on average 4 risks each. Common risks were a history of caesarean section (33.1%), miscarriage (27.2%) and high birth weight (13.5%). Just over 40% had fair or poor eating habits, and nearly half were not getting enough physical activity. Three-quarters had a body mass index indicating overweight or obesity. Those without a postsecondary degree (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.17) and single women (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.96) had over twice the odds of having more risk factors. Those with two children or more had 60% lower odds of having more risk factors (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86). Low education and being born outside Canada were correlated with the greatest number of risk clusters.

Conclusions: Many of the common risk factors were behavioural and thus preventable. Understanding which groups of women are prone to certain risk behaviours provides opportunities for researchers and policy-makers to target interventions more efficiently and effectively.

计划怀孕和最近怀孕的加拿大妇女的医疗、行为和社会孕前和孕间风险因素。
目的:本研究的目的是描述医学、行为和社会的孕前和孕间健康风险因素的聚类,并确定与加拿大妇女中这些风险因素相关的人口因素。设计:通过在线问卷收集横截面数据,评估一系列孕前风险因素。计算各危险因素的流行率和存在的危险因素总数。多变量logistic回归模型确定哪些人口统计学因素与大于平均数量的危险因素相关。探索性因素分析确定了风险因素如何聚集,斯皮尔曼r确定了每个聚类中人口统计学特征与风险因素的关系。设置:加拿大。参与者:参与者是通过公共卫生网站、社交媒体、育儿网页上的广告和正在进行的研究或现有研究数据集的推荐招募的。如果妇女能够阅读和理解英语,能够使用电话或互联网,并且计划第一次怀孕(孕前)或在过去5年内有≥1个孩子,因此处于怀孕间期,则有资格参加。结果:大多数妇女(n=1080)年龄在34岁及以上,处于妊娠间期(98%)。大多数人只报告了12种可能的风险因素类别中的一种(55%),但女性平均每一种报告了4种风险。常见的风险是剖腹产史(33.1%)、流产史(27.2%)和高出生体重史(13.5%)。超过40%的人有一般或不良的饮食习惯,近一半的人没有足够的体育锻炼。四分之三的人的体重指数表明超重或肥胖。没有高等教育学位(OR 2.35;(95% CI 1.74 - 3.17)和单身女性(OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.25 - 3.96)有两倍多的危险因素。有两个或两个以上孩子的妇女有更多危险因素的几率低60% (or 0.68, 95% CI 0.52至0.86)。受教育程度低和出生在加拿大以外与风险集群数量最多相关。结论:许多常见的危险因素是行为性的,因此是可以预防的。了解哪些妇女群体容易发生某些危险行为,为研究人员和决策者提供了更有效和更有针对性的干预措施的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信