Identification of root causes of clinical coding problems in Iranian hospitals.

Mohamad Jebraeily, Jebraeil Farzi, Shahla Fozoonkhah, Abbas Sheikhtaheri
{"title":"Identification of root causes of clinical coding problems in Iranian hospitals.","authors":"Mohamad Jebraeily,&nbsp;Jebraeil Farzi,&nbsp;Shahla Fozoonkhah,&nbsp;Abbas Sheikhtaheri","doi":"10.1177/18333583211060480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving the quality of coded data requires the identification and evaluation of the root causes of clinical coding problems to inform appropriate solutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify the root causes of clinical coding problems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-one clinical coders from three cities in Iran were interviewed. The five formal categories in Ishikawa's cause-and-effect diagram were applied as pre-determined themes for the data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study indicated 16 root causes of clinical coding problems in the five main themes: (i) policies, protocols, and processes (lack of clinical documentation guidelines; lack of audit of clinical coding and feedback to clinical coders; the long interval between documentation and clinical coding; and not using coded data for reimbursement; (ii) individual factors (shortage of clinical coders; low-skilled clinical coders; clinical coders' insufficient communication with physicians; and the lack of continuing education; (iii) equipment and materials (incomplete medical records; lack of access to electronic medical records and electronic coding support tools; (iv) working environment (lack of an appropriate, dynamic, and motivational workspace; and (v) management factors (mangers' inattention to the importance of coding and clinical documentation; and to providing the required staff support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified 16 root causes of clinical coding problems that stand in the way of clinical coding quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The quality of clinical coding could be improved by hospital managers and health policymakers taking these problems into account to develop strategies and implement solutions that target the root causes of clinical coding problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":"52 3","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583211060480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Improving the quality of coded data requires the identification and evaluation of the root causes of clinical coding problems to inform appropriate solutions.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the root causes of clinical coding problems.

Method: Twenty-one clinical coders from three cities in Iran were interviewed. The five formal categories in Ishikawa's cause-and-effect diagram were applied as pre-determined themes for the data analysis.

Results: The study indicated 16 root causes of clinical coding problems in the five main themes: (i) policies, protocols, and processes (lack of clinical documentation guidelines; lack of audit of clinical coding and feedback to clinical coders; the long interval between documentation and clinical coding; and not using coded data for reimbursement; (ii) individual factors (shortage of clinical coders; low-skilled clinical coders; clinical coders' insufficient communication with physicians; and the lack of continuing education; (iii) equipment and materials (incomplete medical records; lack of access to electronic medical records and electronic coding support tools; (iv) working environment (lack of an appropriate, dynamic, and motivational workspace; and (v) management factors (mangers' inattention to the importance of coding and clinical documentation; and to providing the required staff support.

Conclusion: The study identified 16 root causes of clinical coding problems that stand in the way of clinical coding quality improvement.

Implications: The quality of clinical coding could be improved by hospital managers and health policymakers taking these problems into account to develop strategies and implement solutions that target the root causes of clinical coding problems.

查明伊朗医院临床编码问题的根本原因。
背景:提高编码数据的质量需要识别和评估临床编码问题的根本原因,以便为适当的解决方案提供信息。目的:本研究的目的是确定临床编码问题的根本原因。方法:对来自伊朗3个城市的21名临床编码员进行访谈。石川因果图中的五个正式类别被用作数据分析的预先确定的主题。结果:该研究指出了5个主要主题中临床编码问题的16个根本原因:(i)政策、方案和流程(缺乏临床文件指南;缺乏临床编码审核和对临床编码人员的反馈;文档和临床编码之间的时间间隔较长;不使用编码数据报销;(ii)个别因素(缺乏临床编码员);低技能临床编码员;临床编码员与医生沟通不足;缺乏继续教育;(三)设备和材料(医疗记录不完整;缺乏电子病历和电子编码支持工具;(iv)工作环境(缺乏适当的、动态的、激励的工作空间);(v)管理因素(管理者不重视编码和临床文件的重要性;并提供必要的员工支持。结论:本研究找出了影响临床编码质量提高的16个临床编码问题根源。意义:医院管理者和卫生政策制定者考虑到这些问题,制定战略并实施针对临床编码问题根源的解决方案,可以提高临床编码的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信