Incorporation of Student Pharmacists into a Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescribing Telehealth Program for Rural Veterans.

Sonia Bhardwaj, Stephanie Garvin, Sierra Kuehl, Johanna Van Epps, Frederick Dunkerson, Molly Lehmann, Stephanie Gruber, Mara Kieser, Qianqian Zhao, Edward Portillo
{"title":"Incorporation of Student Pharmacists into a Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescribing Telehealth Program for Rural Veterans.","authors":"Sonia Bhardwaj,&nbsp;Stephanie Garvin,&nbsp;Sierra Kuehl,&nbsp;Johanna Van Epps,&nbsp;Frederick Dunkerson,&nbsp;Molly Lehmann,&nbsp;Stephanie Gruber,&nbsp;Mara Kieser,&nbsp;Qianqian Zhao,&nbsp;Edward Portillo","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i3.4500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed class of medications in the United States. Although effective in the treatment of acid related disease, inappropriate PPI use is prevalent, and long-term PPI use has been associated with adverse effects. <b>Objectives:</b> This evaluation explores the novelty of a student-pharmacist directed PPI deprescribing telehealth program with the goals of (1) determining whether PPIs are appropriately prescribed in Veterans via remote student-led chart reviews, (2) identifying if a gap exists between urban and rural Veterans prescribed a PPI, and (3) assessing the feasibility of integrating student pharmacists into the PPI deprescribing process utilizing telehealth visits through a pilot study. <b>Methods</b>: Student pharmacists evaluated PPI appropriateness in Veterans at the William S. Middleton Veterans Hospital. Students collected data via remote chart reviews, compared appropriateness of PPI therapy in rural versus urban Veterans, and conducted a deprescribing pilot call study in rural Veterans with inappropriate PPI indications. Clinical decision-making was agreed upon in collaboration with pharmacist preceptors, however all means of communication with Veterans was performed by student pharmacists. <b>Results:</b> 51% of Veterans were found to have an inappropriate indication for their PPI, though comparison of inappropriate PPI use in rural versus urban Veterans was not statistically significant (n=170, p-value 0.34). 83% of Veterans agreed to proceed with PPI deprescribing and 71% of Veterans ended the pilot study with at least some degree of PPI dose reduction (n=33). <b>Conclusion:</b> Inappropriate PPI use among rural and urban Veterans is prevalent, however a significant difference was not observed between the two cohorts. Student pharmacists are capable of successful telehealth deprescribing interventions in collaboration with pharmacists.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/66/21550417-13-03-4500.PMC9815872.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i3.4500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed class of medications in the United States. Although effective in the treatment of acid related disease, inappropriate PPI use is prevalent, and long-term PPI use has been associated with adverse effects. Objectives: This evaluation explores the novelty of a student-pharmacist directed PPI deprescribing telehealth program with the goals of (1) determining whether PPIs are appropriately prescribed in Veterans via remote student-led chart reviews, (2) identifying if a gap exists between urban and rural Veterans prescribed a PPI, and (3) assessing the feasibility of integrating student pharmacists into the PPI deprescribing process utilizing telehealth visits through a pilot study. Methods: Student pharmacists evaluated PPI appropriateness in Veterans at the William S. Middleton Veterans Hospital. Students collected data via remote chart reviews, compared appropriateness of PPI therapy in rural versus urban Veterans, and conducted a deprescribing pilot call study in rural Veterans with inappropriate PPI indications. Clinical decision-making was agreed upon in collaboration with pharmacist preceptors, however all means of communication with Veterans was performed by student pharmacists. Results: 51% of Veterans were found to have an inappropriate indication for their PPI, though comparison of inappropriate PPI use in rural versus urban Veterans was not statistically significant (n=170, p-value 0.34). 83% of Veterans agreed to proceed with PPI deprescribing and 71% of Veterans ended the pilot study with at least some degree of PPI dose reduction (n=33). Conclusion: Inappropriate PPI use among rural and urban Veterans is prevalent, however a significant difference was not observed between the two cohorts. Student pharmacists are capable of successful telehealth deprescribing interventions in collaboration with pharmacists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

农村退伍军人质子泵抑制剂处方远程医疗项目中学生药剂师的加入。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是美国最广泛使用的一类药物。虽然对酸相关疾病的治疗有效,但不适当的PPI使用是普遍存在的,长期使用PPI与不良反应有关。目的:本评估探讨了学生药剂师指导的PPI处方远程医疗项目的新颖性,其目标是:(1)通过学生主导的远程病历回顾确定退伍军人是否适当地开具PPI;(2)确定城市和农村退伍军人开具PPI之间是否存在差距;(3)通过试点研究评估将学生药剂师纳入PPI处方过程的可行性。方法:学生药师评估威廉s米德尔顿退伍军人医院退伍军人的PPI适宜性。学生们通过远程图表回顾收集数据,比较农村和城市退伍军人PPI治疗的适宜性,并对农村退伍军人不适当的PPI适应症进行了描述性试点电话研究。临床决策是在药剂师导师的合作下达成一致的,然而,与退伍军人的所有沟通手段都是由学生药剂师进行的。结果:51%的退伍军人发现其PPI适应症不合适,尽管农村和城市退伍军人不合适PPI使用的比较无统计学意义(n=170, p值0.34)。83%的退伍军人同意继续使用PPI处方,71%的退伍军人在试点研究结束时至少减少了一定程度的PPI剂量(n=33)。结论:农村和城市退伍军人不适当使用PPI是普遍存在的,但在两个队列之间没有观察到显著差异。学生药剂师能够与药剂师合作,成功地进行远程医疗处方干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信