Risk of Frailty According to the Values of the Ankle-Brachial Index in the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
F Quiñónez-Bareiro, J A Carnicero, A Alfaro-Acha, C Rosado-Artalejo, M C Grau-Jimenez, L Rodriguez-Mañas, F J García-Garcia
{"title":"Risk of Frailty According to the Values of the Ankle-Brachial Index in the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging.","authors":"F Quiñónez-Bareiro,&nbsp;J A Carnicero,&nbsp;A Alfaro-Acha,&nbsp;C Rosado-Artalejo,&nbsp;M C Grau-Jimenez,&nbsp;L Rodriguez-Mañas,&nbsp;F J García-Garcia","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2022.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular function (VF) is a general term used to describe the regulation of blood flow, arterial pressure, capillary recruitment, filtration and central venous pressure, it´s well known that age has direct effects on the VF, and this may affect the frailty status.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse the association between Frailty Trait Scale 5 (FTS 5) with VF and its changes at values below and above a nadir.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective population-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Data from 1.230 patients were taken from the first wave (2006-2009) of the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Frailty was evaluated using FTS 5, which evaluates 5 items: Body mass index, progressive Romberg, physical activity, usual gait speed and hand grip strength. VF was assessed using the ankle-brachial index (ABI) as an indirect measure of VF. Screening for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was also performed by self-reporting and by searching medical records, and was used as exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal ABI cut-off point that maximized the adjusted R2 was 1.071. We observed a statistically significant association for FTS 5 score above and below the ABI cut-off points. For every tenth that the ABI decreased below the cut-off point the patient had an increase in the FTS 5 score of 0.47 points and in every tenth that increased above the cut-off point the increase in the FTS 5 score was 0.41 points. Of all FTS 5 items, the gait speed was the only item that showed a significant association with an ABI changes 0.28 and 0.21 points for every tenth below and above the cut-off point, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty is highly associated with VF. In addition, FTS 5 and its gait speed criteria are useful to detect VF impairments, via changes in ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2022.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Vascular function (VF) is a general term used to describe the regulation of blood flow, arterial pressure, capillary recruitment, filtration and central venous pressure, it´s well known that age has direct effects on the VF, and this may affect the frailty status.

Objectives: To analyse the association between Frailty Trait Scale 5 (FTS 5) with VF and its changes at values below and above a nadir.

Design: Prospective population-based cohort study.

Setting and participants: Data from 1.230 patients were taken from the first wave (2006-2009) of the Toledo Study for Healthy Aging.

Measurements: Frailty was evaluated using FTS 5, which evaluates 5 items: Body mass index, progressive Romberg, physical activity, usual gait speed and hand grip strength. VF was assessed using the ankle-brachial index (ABI) as an indirect measure of VF. Screening for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease was also performed by self-reporting and by searching medical records, and was used as exclusion criteria.

Results: The optimal ABI cut-off point that maximized the adjusted R2 was 1.071. We observed a statistically significant association for FTS 5 score above and below the ABI cut-off points. For every tenth that the ABI decreased below the cut-off point the patient had an increase in the FTS 5 score of 0.47 points and in every tenth that increased above the cut-off point the increase in the FTS 5 score was 0.41 points. Of all FTS 5 items, the gait speed was the only item that showed a significant association with an ABI changes 0.28 and 0.21 points for every tenth below and above the cut-off point, respectively.

Conclusions: Frailty is highly associated with VF. In addition, FTS 5 and its gait speed criteria are useful to detect VF impairments, via changes in ABI.

从托莱多健康老龄化研究中踝肱指数的价值看衰弱的风险。
背景:血管功能(Vascular function, VF)是对血流、动脉压、毛细血管募集、滤过和中心静脉压调节的总称,众所周知,年龄对VF有直接影响,并可能影响机体的虚弱状态。目的:分析衰弱特征量表5 (FTS 5)与VF之间的关系及其在低于和高于最低点时的变化。设计:前瞻性人群队列研究。环境和参与者:来自托莱多健康老龄化研究第一波(2006-2009)的1,230名患者的数据。测量方法:虚弱程度采用FTS 5进行评估,该量表评估5个项目:体重指数、渐进式Romberg、身体活动、通常步态速度和手握力。使用踝肱指数(ABI)作为VF的间接测量来评估VF。通过自我报告和检索医疗记录进行心脑血管疾病筛查,并将其作为排除标准。结果:调整后R2最大的最佳ABI分界点为1.071。我们观察到FTS 5评分高于和低于ABI分界点有统计学意义的关联。ABI低于分割线的每十分之一患者的FTS 5评分增加0.47分,高于分割线的每十分之一患者的FTS 5评分增加0.41分。在所有FTS 5个项目中,步态速度是唯一与ABI变化显著相关的项目,分别在分界点以下和分界点以上每10个项目中显示0.28和0.21点。结论:虚弱与VF高度相关。此外,通过ABI的变化,FTS 5及其步态速度标准可用于检测VF损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信