Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults: A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge.

IF 1.4 4区教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1080/02701367.2022.2125927

J Gandrieau, C Schnitzler, J Cairney, R Keegan, W M Roberts, L M Barnett, P Bentsen, D A Dudley, K W Raymond Sum, F Venetsanou, C Button, S Turcotte, F Berrigan, M Cloes, J R Rudd, V Riga, A Mouton, J Vašíčková, J Blanchard, L Mekkaoui, T Derigny, N Franck, R-M Repond, M Markovič, C Scheuer, F Potdevin

{"title":"Development of ELIP to Assess Physical Literacy for Emerging Adults: A Methodological and Epistemological Challenge.","authors":"J Gandrieau, C Schnitzler, J Cairney, R Keegan, W M Roberts, L M Barnett, P Bentsen, D A Dudley, K W Raymond Sum, F Venetsanou, C Button, S Turcotte, F Berrigan, M Cloes, J R Rudd, V Riga, A Mouton, J Vašíčková, J Blanchard, L Mekkaoui, T Derigny, N Franck, R-M Repond, M Markovič, C Scheuer, F Potdevin","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2125927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method (n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults (n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed-physical; affective; cognitive; and social-with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults' PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2125927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method (n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults (n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed-physical; affective; cognitive; and social-with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults' PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

新兴成人身体素养评估的ELIP发展:方法论和认识论上的挑战。

目的:随着对物理素养(PL)的兴趣增加，开发适当的评估工具已成为其运作的重要下一步。为了推动这些工具的发展，本研究的目的是建立Évaluation de la littelizratie体质(ELIP)的基础，旨在帮助减少在PL评估方法中存在的紧张关系，这种紧张关系可能导致应用环境的低吸收。方法:本研究分为两个步骤:(1)采用德尔菲法(n = 30)开发ELIP第一版;(2)初出期成人认知访谈对项目的修正(n = 32)。结果:专家共识强调了PL需要评估的四个维度:物理;情感;认知;在社交方面，他有了新的视角，包括更喜欢广泛的运动测试，而不是健身测试。结论:研究结果为初出期成人人格特征的评估提供了新的见解，但ELIP在效度、信度和敏感性方面仍需进一步研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 社会科学-心理学

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

125

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.