Hammad A Fadlalmola, Abdelhadi A Mohammed, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amani A Mohammed, Amani A E Taha, Rasha A Ali, Amani M M Abdelrahman, Zahra H Hazazi, Asia S Mohamed, Manal H Fatahalrahman, Anwar B Eltom, Amel E Banaga, Salwa A M Mohmed, Alawia A Elshaikh, Amna M Ali, Ashraf A Elbashir, Randa A Basheer, Wargaa H Taha, Eman M Ebrahim, Elturabi E Ebrahim
{"title":"Efficacy of Massage on Pain Intensity in Post-Cesarean Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hammad A Fadlalmola, Abdelhadi A Mohammed, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amani A Mohammed, Amani A E Taha, Rasha A Ali, Amani M M Abdelrahman, Zahra H Hazazi, Asia S Mohamed, Manal H Fatahalrahman, Anwar B Eltom, Amel E Banaga, Salwa A M Mohmed, Alawia A Elshaikh, Amna M Ali, Ashraf A Elbashir, Randa A Basheer, Wargaa H Taha, Eman M Ebrahim, Elturabi E Ebrahim","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v16i3.861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure that may be considered a safe alternative to natural birth and helps to resolve numerous obstetric conditions. Still, the Cesarean section is painful; relieving pain after a Cesarean section is crucial, therefore analgesia is necessary for the postoperative period. However, analgesia is not free of complications and contraindications, so massage may be a cost-effective method for decreasing pain post-Cesarean. Our study aims to determine the massage role in pain intensity after Cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five electronic databases for relevant studies. Data were extracted from the included studies after screening procedures. We calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for our continuous outcomes, using random or fixed-effect meta-analysis according to heterogenicity status. Interventional studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, while observational studies were assessed using the National Institutes of Health's tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 10 RCTs and five observational studies conducted with over 1,595 post-Cesarean women. The pooled MDs for pain intensity considering baseline values either immediately or post 60-90 minutes were favoring the massagegroup over the control group as follows:(stand. MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], <i>p</i> >.00001; MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], <i>p</i> >.00001, respectively). While pooled MDsregarding post-intervention only eitherimmediately or post 60-90 minutes were:(stand. MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], <i>p</i> =.001; stand. MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72],<i>p</i> > .00001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that using massage was superior to the control groups in decreasing pain intensity either when the pain was assessed immediately after or 60-90 minutes post-massage application.</p>","PeriodicalId":39090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/8c/ijtmb-16-44.PMC10442221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i3.861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure that may be considered a safe alternative to natural birth and helps to resolve numerous obstetric conditions. Still, the Cesarean section is painful; relieving pain after a Cesarean section is crucial, therefore analgesia is necessary for the postoperative period. However, analgesia is not free of complications and contraindications, so massage may be a cost-effective method for decreasing pain post-Cesarean. Our study aims to determine the massage role in pain intensity after Cesarean sections.
Methods: We searched five electronic databases for relevant studies. Data were extracted from the included studies after screening procedures. We calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for our continuous outcomes, using random or fixed-effect meta-analysis according to heterogenicity status. Interventional studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, while observational studies were assessed using the National Institutes of Health's tools.
Results: Our study included 10 RCTs and five observational studies conducted with over 1,595 post-Cesarean women. The pooled MDs for pain intensity considering baseline values either immediately or post 60-90 minutes were favoring the massagegroup over the control group as follows:(stand. MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001; MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001, respectively). While pooled MDsregarding post-intervention only eitherimmediately or post 60-90 minutes were:(stand. MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], p =.001; stand. MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72],p > .00001, respectively).
Conclusion: Our study found that using massage was superior to the control groups in decreasing pain intensity either when the pain was assessed immediately after or 60-90 minutes post-massage application.
背景:剖宫产是一种常见的外科手术,可以被认为是自然分娩的安全选择,并有助于解决许多产科疾病。不过,剖宫产还是很痛苦的;剖宫产术后疼痛的缓解是至关重要的,因此术后镇痛是必要的。然而,镇痛并非没有并发症和禁忌症,因此按摩可能是减少剖宫产后疼痛的一种经济有效的方法。我们的研究旨在确定按摩在剖宫产术后疼痛强度中的作用。方法:检索5个电子数据库进行相关研究。筛选程序后从纳入的研究中提取数据。我们根据异质性状况使用随机或固定效应荟萃分析,计算了连续结果的汇总平均差(MD)和标准化平均差(SMD)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估干预性研究的方法学质量,而使用美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估观察性研究。结果:我们的研究包括10项随机对照试验和5项观察性研究,共对1595名剖宫产后妇女进行了研究。考虑到立即或60-90分钟后的基线值,按摩组的疼痛强度累积MDs优于对照组,如下所示:MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >.00001;MD = -2.64, 95% CI [-3.80, -1.48], p >。00001年,分别)。而仅在干预后立即或60-90分钟后汇总的mds为:MD = -2.04, 95% CI [-3.26, -0.82], p =.001;的立场。MD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.52, -1.72], p > .00001,分别)。结论:我们的研究发现,按摩在减轻疼痛强度方面优于对照组,无论是在按摩后立即评估疼痛还是在按摩后60-90分钟评估疼痛。
期刊介绍:
The IJTMB is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on the research (methodological, physiological, and clinical) and professional development of therapeutic massage and bodywork and its providers, encompassing all allied health providers whose services include manually applied therapeutic massage and bodywork. The Journal provides a professional forum for editorial input; scientifically-based articles of a research, educational, and practice-oriented nature; readers’ commentaries on journal content and related professional matters; and pertinent news and announcements.