Evaluation of a Primary Care-Based Multidisciplinary Transition Clinic for Patients Newly Initiated on Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Substance abuse Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1177/08897077231188592
Michael A Incze, Sonia L Sehgal, Annika Hansen, Luke Garcia, Laura Stolebarger
{"title":"Evaluation of a Primary Care-Based Multidisciplinary Transition Clinic for Patients Newly Initiated on Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Michael A Incze,&nbsp;Sonia L Sehgal,&nbsp;Annika Hansen,&nbsp;Luke Garcia,&nbsp;Laura Stolebarger","doi":"10.1177/08897077231188592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care transitions represent vulnerable events for patients newly initiating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinics may improve care linkage and retention in MOUD treatment. Additionally, these interventions may help primary care clinicians (PCPs) overcome barriers to adopting MOUD into practice. In this evaluation, we assessed the impact of a primary care-based transition clinic for patients newly initiating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective program evaluation within a single academic health system involving adults who newly initiated buprenorphine for OUD through an emergency department-based program and were referred to follow up in either a dedicated multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinic (SPARC) vs referral to usual primary care (UPC). We performed descriptive analyses comparing patient demographics, referral volume, linkage to care, treatment retention, and markers of high-quality care between the 2 groups. A log-rank test was used to determine the difference in probabilities of retention between SPARC and UPC over 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 12 months, the number of referrals to SPARC was greater than to UPC (N = 64 vs N = 26). About 58% of patients referred to SPARC attended an initial visit vs 38% referred to UPC. Treatment retention was consistently greater in SPARC than UPC (1 m: 90% vs 60%; 3 m: 76% vs 40%; 6 m: 60% vs 30%). Markers of care quality including naloxone provision (100% vs 80%) and infectious screening (81% vs 40%) were greater in SPARC clinic. SPARC was associated with a statistically significant increased probability of retention in treatment as compared to UPC (<i>P</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this observational evaluation, a primary care-based multidisciplinary transition clinic for patients initiating buprenorphine MOUD was associated with expanded access to longitudinal OUD treatment and superior linkage to care, retention in care, and quality of care compared to referral to usual primary care. Further research using a more rigorous research design is required to further evaluate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":" ","pages":"220-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08897077231188592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Care transitions represent vulnerable events for patients newly initiating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinics may improve care linkage and retention in MOUD treatment. Additionally, these interventions may help primary care clinicians (PCPs) overcome barriers to adopting MOUD into practice. In this evaluation, we assessed the impact of a primary care-based transition clinic for patients newly initiating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the emergency department.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective program evaluation within a single academic health system involving adults who newly initiated buprenorphine for OUD through an emergency department-based program and were referred to follow up in either a dedicated multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinic (SPARC) vs referral to usual primary care (UPC). We performed descriptive analyses comparing patient demographics, referral volume, linkage to care, treatment retention, and markers of high-quality care between the 2 groups. A log-rank test was used to determine the difference in probabilities of retention between SPARC and UPC over 6 months.

Results: Over 12 months, the number of referrals to SPARC was greater than to UPC (N = 64 vs N = 26). About 58% of patients referred to SPARC attended an initial visit vs 38% referred to UPC. Treatment retention was consistently greater in SPARC than UPC (1 m: 90% vs 60%; 3 m: 76% vs 40%; 6 m: 60% vs 30%). Markers of care quality including naloxone provision (100% vs 80%) and infectious screening (81% vs 40%) were greater in SPARC clinic. SPARC was associated with a statistically significant increased probability of retention in treatment as compared to UPC (P < .01).

Conclusions: In this observational evaluation, a primary care-based multidisciplinary transition clinic for patients initiating buprenorphine MOUD was associated with expanded access to longitudinal OUD treatment and superior linkage to care, retention in care, and quality of care compared to referral to usual primary care. Further research using a more rigorous research design is required to further evaluate these findings.

对急诊科新开始服用丁丙诺啡的患者的初级保健多学科过渡诊所的评估。
背景:对于新开始服用阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物的患者来说,护理过渡代表着易受伤害的事件。以多学科初级保健为基础的过渡诊所可以改善MOUD治疗中的护理联系和保留率。此外,这些干预措施可能有助于初级保健临床医生克服将MOUD应用于实践的障碍。在这项评估中,我们评估了以初级保健为基础的过渡诊所对急诊科新开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的患者的影响。方法:我们在一个单一的学术卫生系统中进行了一项回顾性项目评估,涉及通过急诊科项目新开始丁丙诺啡治疗OUD的成年人,并被转诊到专门的多学科初级保健过渡诊所(SPARC)或转诊到普通初级保健(UPC)进行随访。我们进行了描述性分析,比较了两组患者的人口统计学、转诊量、与护理的联系、治疗保留率和高质量护理的标志物。对数秩检验用于确定SPARC和UPC之间超过6的保留概率的差异 月。结果:超过12 月,SPARC的转诊人数多于UPC(N = 64对N = 26)。约58%的SPARC患者首次就诊,38%的患者转诊UPC。SPARC的治疗保留率始终高于UPC(1 m: 90%对60%;3. m: 76%对40%;6. m: 60%对30%)。SPARC诊所的护理质量标志物,包括纳洛酮的提供(100%对80%)和感染性筛查(81%对40%)更高。与UPC相比,SPARC与治疗中滞留概率的统计学显著增加相关(P 结论:在这项观察性评估中,与转诊到常规初级保健相比,为开始丁丙诺啡MOUD的患者提供基于初级保健的多学科过渡诊所与扩大纵向OUD治疗的机会以及与护理、护理保留和护理质量的优先联系有关。需要使用更严格的研究设计进行进一步的研究,以进一步评估这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信