Simulating Ovariohysterectomy: What Type of Practice Promotes Short- and Long-Term Skills Retention?

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2022-0115
Julie A Hunt, Robert S Gilley, Alexandra Gilley, R Randall Thompson, Stacy L Anderson
{"title":"Simulating Ovariohysterectomy: What Type of Practice Promotes Short- and Long-Term Skills Retention?","authors":"Julie A Hunt, Robert S Gilley, Alexandra Gilley, R Randall Thompson, Stacy L Anderson","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation-based surgical training allows students to learn skills through deliberate practice without the patient risk and stress of operating on a live animal. This study sought to determine the ideal distribution of training sessions to improve short- and long-term retention of the skills necessary to perform a simulated ovariohysterectomy (OVH). Fourth-semester students (<i>n</i> = 102) were enrolled. Students in the weekly instruction group (<i>n</i> = 57) completed 10 hours of training on the OVH simulator, with sessions held at approximately weekly intervals. Students in the monthly instruction group (<i>n</i> = 45) completed the same training with approximately monthly sessions. All students were assessed 1 week (short-term retention test) and 5 months following the last training session (long-term retention test). Students in the weekly instruction group scored higher on their short-term assessment than students in the monthly instruction group (<i>p</i> < .001). However, students' scores in the weekly instruction group underwent a significant decrease between their short- and long-term assessments (<i>p</i> < .001), while the monthly group did not experience a decrease in scores (<i>p</i> < .001). There was no difference in long-term assessment scores between weekly and monthly instruction groups. These findings suggest that if educators are seeking maximal performance at a single time point, scheduling instructional sessions on a weekly basis prior to that time would be superior to monthly sessions, but if educators are concerned with long-term retention of skills, scheduling sessions on either a weekly or monthly basis would accomplish that purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"122-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation-based surgical training allows students to learn skills through deliberate practice without the patient risk and stress of operating on a live animal. This study sought to determine the ideal distribution of training sessions to improve short- and long-term retention of the skills necessary to perform a simulated ovariohysterectomy (OVH). Fourth-semester students (n = 102) were enrolled. Students in the weekly instruction group (n = 57) completed 10 hours of training on the OVH simulator, with sessions held at approximately weekly intervals. Students in the monthly instruction group (n = 45) completed the same training with approximately monthly sessions. All students were assessed 1 week (short-term retention test) and 5 months following the last training session (long-term retention test). Students in the weekly instruction group scored higher on their short-term assessment than students in the monthly instruction group (p < .001). However, students' scores in the weekly instruction group underwent a significant decrease between their short- and long-term assessments (p < .001), while the monthly group did not experience a decrease in scores (p < .001). There was no difference in long-term assessment scores between weekly and monthly instruction groups. These findings suggest that if educators are seeking maximal performance at a single time point, scheduling instructional sessions on a weekly basis prior to that time would be superior to monthly sessions, but if educators are concerned with long-term retention of skills, scheduling sessions on either a weekly or monthly basis would accomplish that purpose.

模拟卵巢切除术:什么类型的练习能促进短期和长期技能保持?
基于模拟的手术培训可以让学生通过有意识的练习来学习技能,而不会有在活体动物身上进行手术的患者风险和压力。本研究旨在确定培训课程的理想分配,以提高短期和长期保留执行模拟卵巢切除术(OVH)所需技能的能力。研究招募了第四学期的学生(102 人)。每周教学组的学生(n = 57)在 OVH 模拟器上完成了 10 个小时的培训,大约每周进行一次培训。月度教学组的学生(人数=45)完成了同样的培训,大约每月一次。所有学生在最后一次培训结束后 1 周(短期保留测试)和 5 个月(长期保留测试)接受了评估。每周授课组学生的短期评估得分高于每月授课组学生(P < .001)。然而,在短期和长期评估中,每周授课组学生的得分显著下降(p < .001),而每月授课组学生的得分没有下降(p < .001)。每周授课组和每月授课组的长期评估得分没有差异。这些研究结果表明,如果教育者希望在一个时间点上取得最佳成绩,那么在此之前按周安排教学课程会比按月安排教学课程更有优势;但如果教育者关注的是技能的长期保持,那么按周或按月安排教学课程都能达到这一目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信